politscienceПолитическая наукаPolitical science1998-1775ИНИОН РАН10.31249/poln/2023.04.13politscience-1001Research ArticleС КНИЖНОЙ ПОЛКИВновь орвеллианский язык, или Евроскептичный «проект страх» (Рецензия)The Orwellian language again, or Eurosceptic “project fear” (Review)БутаковаА. В.ButakovaA. V.

Бутакова Анастасия Владимировна, магистрант Факультета социальных наук

Москва

Butakova Anastasia

Moscow

avbutakova@edu.hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияHSE UniversityRussian Federation20232111202304Политическая наука в условиях социальных и технологических изменений298307Copyright © Бутакова А.В., 20232023Бутакова А.В.Butakova A.V.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/1001Рецензия на книгу

Рецензия на книгу: Chilton P. Brexitspeak: Demagoguery and the decline  of democracy. – Cambridge University Press, 2024. – (forthcoming)

.

ReferencesChilton P. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge, 2004, 226 p.Chilton P. Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge, 2004, 226 p.Chilton P. Brexitspeak: Demagoguery and the decline of democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2023. (forthcoming)Chilton P. Brexitspeak: Demagoguery and the decline of democracy. Cambridge University Press, 2023. (forthcoming)Chilton P. (ed.). Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. Dover, NH: Pinter, 1985, 244 p.Chilton P. (ed.). Language and the nuclear arms debate: Nukespeak today. Dover, NH: Pinter, 1985, 244 p.Chilton P. Orwellian language and the media. London: Pluto Press, 1988, 127 p. Chilton P. Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang, 1996, II, 468 p.Chilton P. Orwellian language and the media. London: Pluto Press, 1988, 127 p. Chilton P. Security metaphors: Cold war discourse from containment to common house. New York: Peter Lang, 1996, II, 468 p.Chilton P. “The people” in populist discourse: Using neuro-cognitive linguistics to understand political meanings. Journal of language and politics. 2017 a, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 582–594.Chilton P. “The people” in populist discourse: Using neuro-cognitive linguistics to understand political meanings. Journal of language and politics. 2017 a, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 582–594.Chilton P. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage & Société. 2017 b, Vol. 2–3, N 160–161, P. 237–249.Chilton P. Toward a neuro-cognitive model of socio-political discourse, and an application to the populist discourse of Donald Trump. Langage & Société. 2017 b, Vol. 2–3, N 160–161, P. 237–249.Chilton P., Aubrey C. (eds). Nineteen Eighty-four in 1984: Autonomy, control, and communication. London: Comedia, 1983, XVII, 120 p.Chilton P., Aubrey C. (eds). Nineteen Eighty-four in 1984: Autonomy, control, and communication. London: Comedia, 1983, XVII, 120 p.Chilton P., Ilyin M.V. Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the 'common European house’. Discourse & Society. 1993, Vol. 4, N 1, P. 7–31.Chilton P., Ilyin M.V. Metaphor in political discourse: the case of the 'common European house’. Discourse & Society. 1993, Vol. 4, N 1, P. 7–31.Chilton P., Mey J.L., Ilyin M.V. (eds). Political discourse in transition in Europe 1989– 1991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1993, IV, 272 p.Chilton P., Mey J.L., Ilyin M.V. (eds). Political discourse in transition in Europe 1989– 1991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 1993, IV, 272 p.Chilton P., Schäffner C. (eds). Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2002, IV, 246 p.Chilton P., Schäffner C. (eds). Politics as text and talk: Analytic approaches to political discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2002, IV, 246 p.Wodak R., Chilton P. (eds). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2005, XIII, 321 p.Wodak R., Chilton P. (eds). A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis: theory, methodology and interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, 2005, XIII, 321 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.