<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31249/poln/2024.02.15</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-1087</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Новые аспекты безопасности: установки граждан по вопросу информационного регулирования в России</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>New aspects of security: citizens’ attitudes on the issue of information regulation in Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бочарова</surname><given-names>А. П.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bocharova</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Бочарова Александра Павловна, аспирант, младший научный сотрудник Международной лаборатории исследований мирового порядка и нового регионализма</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bocharova Alexandra</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">apbocharova@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">HSE University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2024</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>05</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Меняющиеся мировые порядки</issue-title><fpage>326</fpage><lpage>347</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бочарова А.П., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бочарова А.П.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bocharova A.P.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/1087">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/1087</self-uri><abstract><p>Эффективность государственной политики по обеспечению кибербезопасности и информационной безопасности напрямую зависит от того, насколько успешно такие меры будут соблюдаться гражданами на национальном уровне. В рамках данного исследования рассматривается влияние когнитивно-рациональных, ценностно-аффективных и социально-демографических факторов на поддержку респондентами проводимой государством политики в сфере информационного регулирования на примере выбранных кейсов регулирования социальных сетей и введения обязательной системы распознавания лиц в общественном транспорте. В ходе исследования применялся факторный опрос (N=395) с использованием виньеток, позволяющих рассмотреть эффекты фреймирования на восприятие респондентами предлагаемых мер. Анализ результатов эксперимента в данном исследовании показал, что фреймирование новостей путем убеждения населения оказать поддержку предложенным мерам в краткосрочном периоде не приводит к росту поддержки мер, в то время как факторы, оказывающие влияние на общественное восприятие, имеют менее изменчивый во времени характер и включают в себя гражданскую идентичность, доверие политической системе и оценку опасности киберугроз. Результаты исследования позволяют нам подтвердить гипотезу о прямой связи гражданской идентичности и поддержки рестриктивных мер, а также частично подтвердить предположение о том, что политическое доверие граждан и специфика восприятия киберугроз положительно влияют на поддержку введения мер. Кроме того, был получен интересный результат, связанный с неоднородностью поддержки государственных мер на различных уровнях политического доверия респондентов, что позволяет обозначить дальнейший потенциал исследований общественного восприятия таких мер с учетом доверия политической системе и отдельным политическим акторам (правительству, спецслужбам, армии и т.д.) в России.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The effectiveness of government policies to ensure cyber- and information security directly depends on how successfully such measures are followed by citizens at the national level. The author considers the influence of cognitive-rational, value-affective, and socio-demographic factors on respondents' support for government policy in the field of information regulation through selected cases of regulating social networks and introducing a mandatory face recognition system in public transport. In the course of the study, a factorial survey (N=395) was conducted using vignettes to examine the effects of framing on respondents' perception of the measures proposed. The analysis of the experimental results in this study shows that news framing to persuade the population to support the proposed measures does not lead in the short term to an increase in support for the measures. However, certain factors influencing public perception, such as civic identity, trust in the political system, and assessment of cyber threats danger, show less variability over time. The results of the study allow us to confirm the hypothesis of a direct connection between civic identity and support for restrictive measures, as well as partially confirm the assumption that the political trust of citizens and the specifics of perception of cyber threats positively influence support for the introduction of measures. In addition, the heterogeneity of support for government measures at various levels of political trust of respondents was revealed, therefore we can identify the further potential of research on public perception of such measures taking into account trust in the political system and individual political actors (government, special services, army, etc.) in Russia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>информационное регулирование</kwd><kwd>политическая поддержка</kwd><kwd>информационная безопасность</kwd><kwd>меры рестриктивного регулирования</kwd><kwd>дилемма «безопасность или приватность»</kwd><kwd>восприятие киберугроз</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>information regulation</kwd><kwd>political support</kwd><kwd>information security</kwd><kwd>restrictive regulation measures</kwd><kwd>“security vs privacy” dilemma</kwd><kwd>perception of cyber threats</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group xml:lang="ru"><funding-statement>Статья подготовлена в рамках консорциума МГИМО МИД России и НИУ ВШЭ из средств гранта на реализацию программы стратегического академического лидерства «Приоритет-2030».</funding-statement></funding-group><funding-group xml:lang="en"><funding-statement>The article was prepared within the consortium of MGIMO University and HSE University and funded by the grant for the implementation of the Priority 2030 Strategic Academic Leadership Program.</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Григорян Л.К., Горинова Е.В. Факторный опрос: преимущества, область применения, практические рекомендации // Социальная психология и общество. – 2016. – № 7(2). – С. 142–157.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akbari A., Gabdulhakov R. Platform surveillance and resistance in Iran and Russia: the case of Telegram. Surveillance &amp; Society. 2019, N 17 (1/2), P. 223–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.12928</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Саймонс Г. Поворот к реализму // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2023. – Режим доступа: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/povorot-k-realizmu/ (дата посещения: 15.12.2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Auspurg K., Hinz T. Factorial survey experiments. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc., 2014, 168 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483398075</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bordachev, T. Europe, Russia and the liberal world order: international relations after the cold war. London, New York: Routledge, 2021, 209 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bordachev, T. Europe, Russia and the liberal world order: international relations after the cold war. London, New York: Routledge, 2021, 209 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brouard S., Vasilopoulos P., Foucault M. How terrorism affects political attitudes: France in the aftermath of the 2015–2016 attacks. West European politics. 2018, N 41 (5), P. 1073–1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1429752</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brouard S., Vasilopoulos P., Foucault M. How terrorism affects political attitudes: France in the aftermath of the 2015–2016 attacks. West European politics. 2018, N 41 (5), P. 1073–1099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1429752</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chadwick A., Howard P. Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge, 2009, 487 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962541-30</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chadwick A., Howard P. Routledge handbook of internet politics. London: Routledge, 2009, 487 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962541-30</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chmel K., Marques II I., Mironyuk M., Rosenberg D., Turobov A. Privacy versus security in trying times: evidence from Russian public opinion. Higher School of Economics. Series WP BRP 82/PS/2021 “Higher School of Economics Research Paper”. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975380</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chmel K., Marques II I., Mironyuk M., Rosenberg D., Turobov A. Privacy versus security in trying times: evidence from Russian public opinion. Higher School of Economics. Series WP BRP 82/PS/2021 “Higher School of Economics Research Paper”. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3975380</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Davis D.W., Silver B.D. Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American journal of political science. 2004, Vol. 48, № 1, P. 28–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519895</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Davis D.W., Silver B.D. Civil liberties vs. security: Public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. American journal of political science. 2004, Vol. 48, № 1, P. 28–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1519895</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Demchak C., Dombrowski P. Rise of a cybered Westphalian age. Strategic studies quarterly. 2011, Vol. 5, N 1, P. 32–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2_5</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Demchak C., Dombrowski P. Rise of a cybered Westphalian age. Strategic studies quarterly. 2011, Vol. 5, N 1, P. 32–61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55007-2_5</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gomez M.A., Whyte C. Unpacking strategic behavior in cyberspace: a schema-driven approach. Journal of cybersecurity. 2022, Vol. 8, N 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac005</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gomez M.A., Whyte C. Unpacking strategic behavior in cyberspace: a schema-driven approach. Journal of cybersecurity. 2022, Vol. 8, N 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyac005</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grigoryan L.K., Gorinova E.V. Factor survey: advantages, scope of application, practical recommendations. Social psychology and society. 2016, N 7(2), P. 142–157. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grigoryan L.K., Gorinova E.V. Factor survey: advantages, scope of application, practical recommendations. Social psychology and society. 2016, N 7(2), P. 142–157. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Guo D., Habich-Sobiegalla S., Kostka G. Emotions, crisis, and institutions: Explaining compliance with COVID-19 regulations. Regulation &amp; Governance. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12509</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Guo D., Habich-Sobiegalla S., Kostka G. Emotions, crisis, and institutions: Explaining compliance with COVID-19 regulations. Regulation &amp; Governance. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12509</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Khanna P. State sovereignty and self-defence in cyberspace. BRICS Law journal. 2018, N 5 (4), P. 139–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-4-139-154</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Khanna P. State sovereignty and self-defence in cyberspace. BRICS Law journal. 2018, N 5 (4), P. 139–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-4-139-154</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lenard P.T., Miller D. Trust and National Identity. In: Uslaner E.M. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford university press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.36</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenard P.T., Miller D. Trust and National Identity. In: Uslaner E.M. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford university press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.013.36</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLaren L. Immigration and perceptions of national political systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739463.001.0001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLaren L. Immigration and perceptions of national political systems in Europe. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739463.001.0001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mužík M., Šerek J. What reduces support for civil liberties: Authoritarianism, national identity, and perceived threat. Analyses of social issues and public policy. 2021, N 21 (1), P. 734–760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12241</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mužík M., Šerek J. What reduces support for civil liberties: Authoritarianism, national identity, and perceived threat. Analyses of social issues and public policy. 2021, N 21 (1), P. 734–760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12241</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sekerdej M., Kossowska M. Motherland under attack! Nationalism, terrorist threat, and support for the restriction of civil liberties. Polish psychological bulletin. 2011, N 42 (1), P. 11–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0003-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sekerdej M., Kossowska M. Motherland under attack! Nationalism, terrorist threat, and support for the restriction of civil liberties. Polish psychological bulletin. 2011, N 42 (1), P. 11–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10059-011-0003-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Simons G. A turn towards realism. Russia in global affairs. 2023. Mode of access: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/povorot-k-realizmu/ (accessed: 15.12.2023) (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Simons G. A turn towards realism. Russia in global affairs. 2023. Mode of access: https://globalaffairs.ru/articles/povorot-k-realizmu/ (accessed: 15.12.2023) (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Snider K.L., Shandler R., Zandani S., Canetti D. Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes toward cybersecurity policies. Journal of cybersecurity. 2021, N 7, P. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyab019</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Snider K.L., Shandler R., Zandani S., Canetti D. Cyberattacks, cyber threats, and attitudes toward cybersecurity policies. Journal of cybersecurity. 2021, N 7, P. 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyab019</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Theiss-Morse E., Barton D.-G. Emotion, cognition, and political trust. In: Zmerli S., Van der Meer T. W. (eds.). Handbook on political trust. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, P. 160–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00021</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Theiss-Morse E., Barton D.-G. Emotion, cognition, and political trust. In: Zmerli S., Van der Meer T. W. (eds.). Handbook on political trust. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007, P. 160–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00021</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Trein P., Varone F. Citizens’ agreement to share personal data for public policies: trust and issue importance. Journal of European public policy. 2023, P. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2205434</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Trein P., Varone F. Citizens’ agreement to share personal data for public policies: trust and issue importance. Journal of European public policy. 2023, P. 1–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2205434</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">van Der Does R., Kantorowicz J., Kuipers S., Liem M. Does terrorism dominate citizens’ hearts or minds? The relationship between fear of terrorism and trust in government. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2021, Vol.33, № 6, P. 1276–1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1608951</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">van Der Does R., Kantorowicz J., Kuipers S., Liem M. Does terrorism dominate citizens’ hearts or minds? The relationship between fear of terrorism and trust in government. Terrorism and Political Violence. 2021, Vol.33, № 6, P. 1276–1294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1608951</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
