<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-192</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>СОВЕТСКИЙ МОДЕРН СКВОЗЬ ПРИЗМУ КОНЦЕПЦИИ МНОЖЕСТВЕННЫХ МОДЕРНОВ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Soviet modernity in the multipule modernities perspective</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Масловский</surname><given-names>Михаил Валентинович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">maslovski@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Maslovskiy</surname><given-names>M. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Нижегородский государственный университет им. Н.И. Лобачевского<country>Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2012</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Идеи модернизации в политической науке и политической практике</issue-title><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>176</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Масловский М.В., Maslovskiy M.V., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Масловский М.В., Maslovskiy M.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Масловский М.В., Maslovskiy M.V.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/192">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/192</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассмотрены теоретические подходы ведущих представителей концепции множественности модерна в западной социологии. Особое внимание уделено анализу модерна как цивилизации Ш. Эйзенштадта и исследованию советской версии модерна в работах Й. Арнасона. Обсуждается влияние данного теоретического направления на современную политическую социологию</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Theoretical approaches of the leading representatives of the multiple modernities theory are considered in the article. Particular attention is devoted to Shmuel Eisenstadt's concept of modernity as a civilization and Johann Arnason's analysis of the Soviet version of modernity. The influence of this theoretical perspective on contemporary political sociology is discussed.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>политическая социология</kwd><kwd>модерн</kwd><kwd>цивилизация</kwd><kwd>Ш. Эйзенштадт</kwd><kwd>Й. Арнасон</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>political sociology</kwd><kwd>modernity</kwd><kwd>civilization</kwd><kwd>Shmuel Eisenstadt</kwd><kwd>Johann Arnason</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Арнасон Й. Коммунизм и модерн // Социологический журнал. - М., 2011. - № 1. - С. 10-35.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Арнасон Й. Коммунизм и модерн // Социологический журнал. - М., 2011. - № 1. - С. 10-35.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Блоккер П. Сталкиваясь с модернизацией: открытость и закрытость другой Европы // Новое литературное обозрение. - М., 2009. - № 6. - С. 18-34.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Блоккер П. Сталкиваясь с модернизацией: открытость и закрытость другой Европы // Новое литературное обозрение. - М., 2009. - № 6. - С. 18-34.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Виттрок Б. Современность: одна, ни одной или множество? Европейские истоки и современность как всеобщее состояние // Полис. - М., 2002. - № 1. - С. 141-159.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Виттрок Б. Современность: одна, ни одной или множество? Европейские истоки и современность как всеобщее состояние // Полис. - М., 2002. - № 1. - С. 141-159.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гудков Л. Общество с ограниченной вменяемостью // Вестник общественного мнения. - М., 2008. - № 1. - С. 8-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Гудков Л. Общество с ограниченной вменяемостью // Вестник общественного мнения. - М., 2008. - № 1. - С. 8-32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Дубин Б.В. Россия нулевых: политическая культура - историческая память - повседневная жизнь. - М.: РОССПЭН, 2011. - 391 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Дубин Б.В. Россия нулевых: политическая культура - историческая память - повседневная жизнь. - М.: РОССПЭН, 2011. - 391 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Коткин С. Новые времена: Советский Союз в межвоенном цивилизационном контексте // Мишель Фуко и Россия: Сб. статей / Под ред. О. Хархордина. - СПб.: Европейский ун-т в С.-Петербурге: Летний сад, 2001. - С. 239-315.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Коткин С. Новые времена: Советский Союз в межвоенном цивилизационном контексте // Мишель Фуко и Россия: Сб. статей / Под ред. О. Хархордина. - СПб.: Европейский ун-т в С.-Петербурге: Летний сад, 2001. - С. 239-315.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малинова О.Ю. Тема империи в современных российских политических дискурсах // Наследие империй и будущее России / Под ред. А.И. Миллера. - М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2008. - С. 59-102.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Малинова О.Ю. Тема империи в современных российских политических дискурсах // Наследие империй и будущее России / Под ред. А.И. Миллера. - М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2008. - С. 59-102.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Масловский М.В. Анализ советской версии модерна в исторической социологии Йохана Арнасона // Социологический журнал. - М., 2011. - № 1. - C. 5-9.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Масловский М.В. Анализ советской версии модерна в исторической социологии Йохана Арнасона // Социологический журнал. - М., 2011. - № 1. - C. 5-9.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Штомпка П. Теоретическая социология и социологическое воображение // Социологический журнал. - М., 2001. - № 1. - С. 148-158.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Штомпка П. Теоретическая социология и социологическое воображение // Социологический журнал. - М., 2001. - № 1. - С. 148-158.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ. Сравнительное изучение цивилизаций. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. - 416 c.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ. Сравнительное изучение цивилизаций. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 1999. - 416 c.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alexander J. Fin de siecle social theory: Relativism, reduction and the problem of reason. - L.: Verso, 1995. - 231 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alexander J. Fin de siecle social theory: Relativism, reduction and the problem of reason. - L.: Verso, 1995. - 231 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arnason J. The future that failed: Origins and destinies of the Soviet model. - L.: Routledge, 1993. - 227 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arnason J. The future that failed: Origins and destinies of the Soviet model. - L.: Routledge, 1993. - 227 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arnason J. The Soviet model as a mode of globalization // Thesis eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995. - N 41. - P. 36-53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arnason J. The Soviet model as a mode of globalization // Thesis eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995. - N 41. - P. 36-53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arnason J. Alternating modernities. The case of Czechoslovakia // European journal of social theory. - L., 2005. - Vol. 8, N 4. - P. 435-452.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arnason J. Alternating modernities. The case of Czechoslovakia // European journal of social theory. - L., 2005. - Vol. 8, N 4. - P. 435-452.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arnason J. Understanding intercivilizational encounters // Thesis Eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. - N 86. - P. 39-53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arnason J. Understanding intercivilizational encounters // Thesis Eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. - N 86. - P. 39-53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arnason J. Introduction: Domains and perspectives of civilizational analysis // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 5-13.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arnason J. Introduction: Domains and perspectives of civilizational analysis // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 5-13.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eisenstadt S. The civilizational dimension in sociological analysis // Thesis eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000. - N 62. - P. 1-21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstadt S. The civilizational dimension in sociological analysis // Thesis eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2000. - N 62. - P. 1-21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eisenstadt S. The civilizational dimension of modernity: Modernity as a distinct civilization // International sociology. - L., 2001. - Vol. 16, N 3. - P. 320-340.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstadt S. The civilizational dimension of modernity: Modernity as a distinct civilization // International sociology. - L., 2001. - Vol. 16, N 3. - P. 320-340.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eisenstadt S. Multiple modernities // Multiple modernities / Ed. by S. Eisenstadt. - L.: Transaction publications, 2002. - P. 1-29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstadt S. Multiple modernities // Multiple modernities / Ed. by S. Eisenstadt. - L.: Transaction publications, 2002. - P. 1-29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Knoebl W. Path dependency and civilizational analysis: Methodological challenges and theoretical tasks // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 83-97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Knoebl W. Path dependency and civilizational analysis: Methodological challenges and theoretical tasks // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 83-97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schmidt V. Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity? // Current sociology. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. - Vol. 54, N 1. - P. 77-97.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schmidt V. Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity? // Current sociology. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. - Vol. 54, N 1. - P. 77-97.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spohn W. Eisenstadt on civilizations and multiple modernity: Review essay // European journal of social theory. - L., 2001. - Vol. 4, N 4. - P. 499-508.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spohn W. Eisenstadt on civilizations and multiple modernity: Review essay // European journal of social theory. - L., 2001. - Vol. 4, N 4. - P. 499-508.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spohn W. Political sociology: Between civilizations and modernities. A multiple modernites perspective // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 49-66.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spohn W. Political sociology: Between civilizations and modernities. A multiple modernites perspective // European journal of social theory. - L., 2010. - Vol. 13, N 1. - P. 49-66.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Spohn W. World history, civilizational analysis and historical sociology: Interpretations of non-western civilizations in the work of Johann Arnason // European journal of social theory. - L., 2011. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 23-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Spohn W. World history, civilizational analysis and historical sociology: Interpretations of non-western civilizations in the work of Johann Arnason // European journal of social theory. - L., 2011. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 23-39.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wagner P. Multiple trajectories of modernity: Why social theory needs historical sociology // Thesis Eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010. - N 100. - P. 53-60.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wagner P. Multiple trajectories of modernity: Why social theory needs historical sociology // Thesis Eleven. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010. - N 100. - P. 53-60.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
