politscienceПолитическая наукаPolitical science1998-1775ИНИОН РАНpolitscience-242Research ArticleРАКУРСЫРЕШАЯ ВОПРОСЫ ВМЕСТЕ, ИЛИ КАК ВОПЛОТИТЬ ИДЕАЛЫ ДЕЛИБЕРАТИВНОЙ ДЕМОКРАТИИ ЧЕРЕЗ ИНТЕРНЕТSolving problems together, or How to implement the ideals of deliberative democracy onlineСоколовБорис ОлеговичSokolovO. B.bssokolov@gmail.comСанкт-Петербургский государственный университет ; Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»Russian Federation20131105202301Политическое участие в условиях сетевого общества6982Copyright © Соколов Б.О., 20232023Соколов Б.О.Sokolov O.B.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/242

Статья предлагает вниманию читателей обзор докладов, представленных на IV Международной конференции по онлайн-делиберации, прошедшей в г. Лидс (Великобритания) в 2010 г. и посвященной поиску ответов на социальные и технологические вызовы, с которыми сталкивается эта относительно новая область исследований. Обзор предваряется кратким описанием теоретических предпосылок возникновения интереса к данной проблематике в современной политической науке. На примерах конкретных работ рассматриваются основные направления исследований. В заключение обсуждаются дальнейшие перспективы исследований в сфере политических онлайн-дискуссий, в том числе и применительно к отечественным реалиям.

In this article various papers presented on the IV International conference on online-deliberation which took place at the University of Leeds (UK) in 2010 and was dedicated to the search of the proper answers to all social and technological challenges to this relatively new scientific field are reviewed. To begin with the author gives a brief history of theoretical premises which caused the interest to this agenda in contemporary political science. The main scientific trends are examined on the concrete research examples. In the conclusion the further outlooks of the researches in the field of political online-deliberation, including those in our country, are discussed.

делиберативная демократияэлектронное участиеонлайн-делиберацияисследования Интернетаdeliberative democracye-Participationonline-deli- berationInternet-studiesReferencesДмитриев В.М., Ганджа В.В. Автоматизированная система онлайн-проектирования // Доклады ТУСУРа. – Томск, 2011. – № 2 (24), Ч. 2. – С. 331–333.Дмитриев В.М., Ганджа В.В. Автоматизированная система онлайн-проектирования // Доклады ТУСУРа. – Томск, 2011. – № 2 (24), Ч. 2. – С. 331–333.Докторов Б. Методология и практика опросов обогащенного общественного мнения // Социальная реальность. – М., 2007. – № 10. – http://socreal.fom.ru/?link=ARTICLE&aid=463 (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)Докторов Б. Методология и практика опросов обогащенного общественного мнения // Социальная реальность. – М., 2007. – № 10. – http://socreal.fom.ru/?link=ARTICLE&aid=463 (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)Каневский М.А. Проектирование интеллектуальных систем онлайн-взаимодействия органов власти с гражданами и бизнесом на основе коллективного опыта и техник обмена знаниями. – Режим доступа: http://www.emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf/0/0113f7366fec13914425796e003f433a?OpenDocument&Click= (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)Каневский М.А. Проектирование интеллектуальных систем онлайн-взаимодействия органов власти с гражданами и бизнесом на основе коллективного опыта и техник обмена знаниями. – Режим доступа: http://www.emag.iis.ru/arc/infosoc/emag.nsf/0/0113f7366fec13914425796e003f433a?OpenDocument&Click= (Дата посещения: 03.08.2012.)Лебедев П.А., Полякова В.В. Форумная онлайн-дискуссия: проблемы организации и проведения // Онлайн-исследования в России 2.0 / Под ред. Шашкина А.В., Девятко И.Ф., Давыдова С.Г. – М.: РИЦ «СевероВосток», 2010. – С. 173–180.Лебедев П.А., Полякова В.В. Форумная онлайн-дискуссия: проблемы организации и проведения // Онлайн-исследования в России 2.0 / Под ред. Шашкина А.В., Девятко И.Ф., Давыдова С.Г. – М.: РИЦ «СевероВосток», 2010. – С. 173–180.Bicking M., Wimmer M.A. Tools and technologies in e-participation: Insights from project evaluation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 75–86. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Bicking M., Wimmer M.A. Tools and technologies in e-participation: Insights from project evaluation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 75–86. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Blomgren Bingham L. Online deliberation and the United States open government initiative // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 53–59. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Blomgren Bingham L. Online deliberation and the United States open government initiative // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 53–59. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Bohman J. Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy // The journal of political philosophy. – Malden, МА, 1998. – Vol. 6, N 4. – P. 400–425.Bohman J. Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy // The journal of political philosophy. – Malden, МА, 1998. – Vol. 6, N 4. – P. 400–425.Buchstein H. Bytes that bite: The internet and deliberative democracy // Constellations. – N.Y., 1997. – Vol. 4, N 2. – P. 248–263.Buchstein H. Bytes that bite: The internet and deliberative democracy // Constellations. – N.Y., 1997. – Vol. 4, N 2. – P. 248–263.Cindio F. de, Peraboni C. Design issues for building deliberative digital habitats // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 41–52. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Cindio F. de, Peraboni C. Design issues for building deliberative digital habitats // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 41–52. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Cohen J. Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy // The good polity / Hamlin A., Pettit P. (eds). – Oxford: Blackwell, 1989. – P. 17–34.Cohen J. Deliberative democracy and democratic legitimacy // The good polity / Hamlin A., Pettit P. (eds). – Oxford: Blackwell, 1989. – P. 17–34.Dahlberg L. The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere // Information, communication & society. – N.Y., 2001. – Vol. 4, N 4. – P. 615–633.Dahlberg L. The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere // Information, communication & society. – N.Y., 2001. – Vol. 4, N 4. – P. 615–633.Dahlgren P. The internet and the democratization of civic culture // Political communication. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – P. 335–340.Dahlgren P. The internet and the democratization of civic culture // Political communication. – 2000. – Vol. 17. – P. 335–340.Dahlgren P. The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation // Political communication. – 2005. – Vol. 22, N 2. – P. 147–162.Dahlgren P. The internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation // Political communication. – 2005. – Vol. 22, N 2. – P. 147–162.Desquinabo N., Ferrand N. Online deliberation and impact on decision: A local planning case// From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 157–171. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.Desquinabo N., Ferrand N. Online deliberation and impact on decision: A local planning case// From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 157–171. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Developing and using online tools for deliberative democracy (Carnegie Mellon university, June 19–21, 2003). – Mode of access: http://web.archive.org/web/20060314061609/http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/style/Seminar.html (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012.)Developing and using online tools for deliberative democracy (Carnegie Mellon university, June 19–21, 2003). – Mode of access: http://web.archive.org/web/20060314061609/http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/style/Seminar.html (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012.)Elster J. Introduction // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed.). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 1–18.Elster J. Introduction // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed.). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 1–18.Elster J. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – P. 3–33.Elster J. The market and the forum: three varieties of political theory // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – P. 3–33.Fearon J.D. Deliberation as discussion // Deliberative democracy / Elster J (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 44–68.Fearon J.D. Deliberation as discussion // Deliberative democracy / Elster J (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 44–68.Fishkin J.S., Luskin R.C. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion // Acta Politica. – 2005. – Vol. 40, N 3. – P. 284–298.Fishkin J.S., Luskin R.C. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion // Acta Politica. – 2005. – Vol. 40, N 3. – P. 284–298.From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – 267 p. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – 267 p. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Gimmler A. Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet // Philosophy and social criticism. – L., 2001. – Vol. 27, N 4. – P. 21–39.Gimmler A. Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet // Philosophy and social criticism. – L., 2001. – Vol. 27, N 4. – P. 21–39.Graham T. What’s wife swap have to do with it? Talking politics online // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 101–116. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Graham T. What’s wife swap have to do with it? Talking politics online // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 101–116. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Gutmann A., Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? – Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 2004. – 256 p.Gutmann A., Thompson D. Why deliberative democracy? – Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 2004. – 256 p.Habermas J. Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research // Communication theory. – Malden, MA, 2006. – Vol. 16 (4). – P. 411–426.Habermas J. Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research // Communication theory. – Malden, MA, 2006. – Vol. 16 (4). – P. 411–426.Hees M. van. The limits of epistemic democracy // Social choice and welfare. – 2007. – Vol. 28, N 4. – P. 649–666.Hees M. van. The limits of epistemic democracy // Social choice and welfare. – 2007. – Vol. 28, N 4. – P. 649–666.Karlsson M. What does it take to make online deliberation happen? A comparative analysis of 28 Online discussion forums // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 142–156. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Karlsson M. What does it take to make online deliberation happen? A comparative analysis of 28 Online discussion forums // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 142–156. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Kies R., Wojcik S. European web-deliberation: lessons from the european citizens consultation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 198–211. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Kies R., Wojcik S. European web-deliberation: lessons from the european citizens consultation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 198–211. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Landa D., Meirowitz A. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy // American journal of political science. – 2009. – Vol. 53, N 2. – P. 427–444.Landa D., Meirowitz A. Game theory, information, and deliberative democracy // American journal of political science. – 2009. – Vol. 53, N 2. – P. 427–444.Liddo A. de, Shum B.S. Capturing and representing deliberation in participatory planning practices // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 27–40. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Liddo A. de, Shum B.S. Capturing and representing deliberation in participatory planning practices // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 27–40. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)List C., Dryzek J. Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation // British journal of political science. – Cambridge, 2003. – Vol. 33, N 1. – P. 1–28.List C., Dryzek J. Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation // British journal of political science. – Cambridge, 2003. – Vol. 33, N 1. – P. 1–28.List C., Goodin R.E. Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem // Journal of political philosophy. – 2001. – Vol. 9, N 3. – P. 277–306.List C., Goodin R.E. Epistemic democracy: Generalizing the Condorcet Jury Theorem // Journal of political philosophy. – 2001. – Vol. 9, N 3. – P. 277–306.Loukis E., Wimmer M.A. Analysing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 14–26. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Loukis E., Wimmer M.A. Analysing different models of structured electronic consultation on legislation under formation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 14–26. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Manosevitch E. Mapping the practice of online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 172–188. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Manosevitch E. Mapping the practice of online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 172–188. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Merwe R., Van der, Meehan A. Direct deliberative governance online: Consensual problem solving or accommodated pluralism? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 87–100. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Merwe R., Van der, Meehan A. Direct deliberative governance online: Consensual problem solving or accommodated pluralism? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 87–100. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Michelman F. How can the people ever make the laws. A critique of deliberative democracy // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – 179 p.Michelman F. How can the people ever make the laws. A critique of deliberative democracy // Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics / Bohman J., Rehg W. (eds.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997. – 179 p.Miller D. Deliberative democracy and social choice // Political studies. – Oxford, 1992. – Vol. 40. – P. 54–67.Miller D. Deliberative democracy and social choice // Political studies. – Oxford, 1992. – Vol. 40. – P. 54–67.Misnikov Y. Discursive qualities of public discussion on the Russian internet: Testing the Habermasian communicative action empirically // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 60–74. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Misnikov Y. Discursive qualities of public discussion on the Russian internet: Testing the Habermasian communicative action empirically // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 60–74. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Monnoyer-Smith L., Talpin J. Participatory frames in deliberative devices: the ideal-EU case study // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 250–258. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Monnoyer-Smith L., Talpin J. Participatory frames in deliberative devices: the ideal-EU case study // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 250–258. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice / T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan (eds.). – Stanford, Calif.: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. – 374 p.Online deliberation: Design, research, and practice / T. Davies and S.P. Gangadharan (eds.). – Stanford, Calif.: Center for the study of language and information, 2009. – 374 p.Smith K.L. Ethnographically exploring deliberation through policy pertinent social media production in Ontario // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 212–218. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Smith K.L. Ethnographically exploring deliberation through policy pertinent social media production in Ontario // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 212–218. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Smith S. Mobilising civic resources through eParticipation in the european public sphere: problem-solving, relegitimisation or decoupling? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 126–141. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Smith S. Mobilising civic resources through eParticipation in the european public sphere: problem-solving, relegitimisation or decoupling? // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 126–141. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Snaith M., Lawrence J., Reed C. Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 2–14. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Snaith M., Lawrence J., Reed C. Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 2–14. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Stokes S.G. Pathologies of deliberation // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 123–139.Stokes S.G. Pathologies of deliberation // Deliberative democracy / Elster J. (ed). – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1998. – P. 123–139.Stromer-Galley J., Muhlberger P., Webb N. Deliberative e-rulemaking decision facilitation: Challenges to enacting real world deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 232–239. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Stromer-Galley J., Muhlberger P., Webb N. Deliberative e-rulemaking decision facilitation: Challenges to enacting real world deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 232–239. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Tools for participation: Collaboration, participation, and decision support (University of California, Berkeley, June 26–29, 2008). – Mode of access: http://www.publicsphereproject.org/events/diac08/ (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012).Tools for participation: Collaboration, participation, and decision support (University of California, Berkeley, June 26–29, 2008). – Mode of access: http://www.publicsphereproject.org/events/diac08/ (Дата посещения: 25.09.2012).Trice M. Comment fields and content analysis: A means to study interaction on news sites // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 189–197. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Trice M. Comment fields and content analysis: A means to study interaction on news sites // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 189–197. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Velikanov C. Facilitation procedures for written online deliberation: A research and development project in the field of deliberative democracy // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 240–249. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Velikanov C. Facilitation procedures for written online deliberation: A research and development project in the field of deliberative democracy // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 240–249. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Wright S. Political as usual? Revolution, normalisation and a new agenda for online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 219–231 – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Wright S. Political as usual? Revolution, normalisation and a new agenda for online deliberation // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 219–231 – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Zhang W. Simulating the ideal eDeliberation: The roles of inclusion, equalization and rationalization // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 117–125. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)Zhang W. Simulating the ideal eDeliberation: The roles of inclusion, equalization and rationalization // From e-participation to online deliberation, proceedings of the Fourth international conference on online deliberation / De Cindio F., Machintosh A., Peraboni C. (eds.). – Leeds, 2010. – P. 117–125. – Mode of access: http://www.od2010.dico.unimi.it/docs/proceedings/Proceedings_OD2010.pdf (Дата посещения: 10.11.2012.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.