<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-257</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОСТОЯНИЕ ДИСЦИПЛИНЫ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>КАК ИЗУЧАТЬ ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЕ РЕЛИГИИ И ПОЛИТИКИ?</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>How to study the interaction of religion and politics?</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кудряшова</surname><given-names>Ирина Владимировна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kudryashova</surname><given-names>I. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">kudryashova23@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff xml:lang="ru" id="aff-1"><institution>МГИМО-Университет; ИНИОН РАН</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2013</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Религия и политика</issue-title><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>24</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кудряшова И.В., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кудряшова И.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kudryashova I.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/257">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/257</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья посвящена проблемам изучения современных взаимодействий религии и политики. В частности, представлены основные положения секулярной парадигмы и ее критический анализ, изложены теоретические подходы к исследованию политического присутствия религии, показаны ключевые направления исследований в этой области. Автор подчеркивает, что отношения между религией и современностью имеют чрезвычайно сложный характер и подвержены действию разнонаправленных тенденций.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article discusses the study of modern interaction between religion and politics. In particular, it demonstrates arguments of the secular paradigm and its critical analysis, outlines theoretical approaches to the study of religion’s political persistence, shows the key areas of research in this area. The author emphasizes that the relationship between religion and modernity is of extremely complex character and is subject to differently oriented trends.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>религия и политика</kwd><kwd>модернизация</kwd><kwd>теории секуляризации</kwd><kwd>религиозное возрождение</kwd><kwd>фундаментализм</kwd><kwd>постсекулярное общество</kwd><kwd>religion and politics</kwd><kwd>modernization</kwd><kwd>secularization theories</kwd><kwd>religious revivalism</kwd><kwd>fundamentalism</kwd><kwd>post-secular society</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кудряшова И.В. Фундаментализм в пространстве современного мира // Полис. – М., 2002. – № 1. – С. 66–77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кудряшова И.В. Фундаментализм в пространстве современного мира // Полис. – М., 2002. – № 1. – С. 66–77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кудряшова И.В. Турция как феномен современности // Политическая наука. – М., 2008. – № 4. – С. 125–150.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Кудряшова И.В. Турция как феномен современности // Политическая наука. – М., 2008. – № 4. – С. 125–150.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Милль Дж.С. О свободе // О свободе. Антология мировой либеральной мысли (I половина ХХ века). – М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. – С. 288–392.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Милль Дж.С. О свободе // О свободе. Антология мировой либеральной мысли (I половина ХХ века). – М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2000. – С. 288–392.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мчедлова М.М. Религиозная идентичность // Политическая идентичность и политика идентичности: В 2 т. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. – Т. 1. Идентичность как категория политической науки: словарь терминов и понятий / Отв. ред. Семененко И.С. – С. 123–127.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Мчедлова М.М. Религиозная идентичность // Политическая идентичность и политика идентичности: В 2 т. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. – Т. 1. Идентичность как категория политической науки: словарь терминов и понятий / Отв. ред. Семененко И.С. – С. 123–127.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семененко И.С. Идентичность как категория политической науки: опыт концептуализации // Политическая идентичность и политика идентичности: В 2 т. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. – Т. 1. Идентичность как категория политической науки: словарь терминов и понятий / Отв. ред. Семененко И.С. – С. 7–17.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Семененко И.С. Идентичность как категория политической науки: опыт концептуализации // Политическая идентичность и политика идентичности: В 2 т. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. – Т. 1. Идентичность как категория политической науки: словарь терминов и понятий / Отв. ред. Семененко И.С. – С. 7–17.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ: сравнительное изучение цивилизаций. – М.: Аспект-пресс, 1999. – 416 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Эйзенштадт Ш. Революция и преобразование обществ: сравнительное изучение цивилизаций. – М.: Аспект-пресс, 1999. – 416 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berger P.L. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. – Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967. – 230 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berger P.L. The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. – Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1967. – 230 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berger P.L. The desecularization of the world: A global overview // The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics / P.L. Berger (ed.). – Grand Rapids, Mich.: Ethics and public policy centre: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999. – P. 1–18.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berger P.L. The desecularization of the world: A global overview // The desecularization of the world: Resurgent religion and world politics / P.L. Berger (ed.). – Grand Rapids, Mich.: Ethics and public policy centre: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1999. – P. 1–18.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bruce S. The curious case of unnecessary recantation: Berger and secularization // Peter Berger and the study of religion / Woodhead L., Heelas P., Martin D (eds.). – L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2001. – P. 87–100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bruce S. The curious case of unnecessary recantation: Berger and secularization // Peter Berger and the study of religion / Woodhead L., Heelas P., Martin D (eds.). – L.; N.Y.: Routledge, 2001. – P. 87–100.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Casanova J. Public religions in the modern world. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994. – 320 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Casanova J. Public religions in the modern world. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994. – 320 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Casanova J. Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective // Religion, globalization, and culture / Beyer P., Beaman L. (eds.). – Leiden: Brill, 2007. – P. 101–120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Casanova J. Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective // Religion, globalization, and culture / Beyer P., Beaman L. (eds.). – Leiden: Brill, 2007. – P. 101–120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chaves M., Gorski P.S. Religious pluralism and religious participation // Annual review of sociology. – Palo Alto, CA, 2001. – Vol. 27. – P. 261–281. – Mode of access: http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/issrc/shared/Chaves_Gorski.pdf (Дата посещения: 14.02.2013.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chaves M., Gorski P.S. Religious pluralism and religious participation // Annual review of sociology. – Palo Alto, CA, 2001. – Vol. 27. – P. 261–281. – Mode of access: http://www.unil.ch/webdav/site/issrc/shared/Chaves_Gorski.pdf (Дата посещения: 14.02.2013.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Contesting fundamentalisms / Schick C., Jaffe J., Watkinson A.M. (eds.). – Delhi: Aakar books, 2006. – 176 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Contesting fundamentalisms / Schick C., Jaffe J., Watkinson A.M. (eds.). – Delhi: Aakar books, 2006. – 176 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eisenstadt S.N. Fundamentalism, sectarianism, and revolution: The Jacobin dimension of Modernity. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1999. – 280 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstadt S.N. Fundamentalism, sectarianism, and revolution: The Jacobin dimension of Modernity. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1999. – 280 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Eisenstadt S.N. The paradoxes of democracy: Fragility, continuity, and change. – Washington, D.C.; Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press: The John Hopkins univ. press, 1999. – 120 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Eisenstadt S.N. The paradoxes of democracy: Fragility, continuity, and change. – Washington, D.C.; Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press: The John Hopkins univ. press, 1999. – 120 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fundamentalism in comparative perspective / Kaplan L. (ed.). – Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts press, 1992. – 184 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fundamentalism in comparative perspective / Kaplan L. (ed.). – Amherst: Univ. of Massachusetts press, 1992. – 184 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Fundamentalisms and the state: Remaking polities, economies, and militance / Marty E.M., Appleby R.S., Garvey J.H., Kuran T. (eds.). – Chicago: The univ. of Chicago press, 1993. – 665 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fundamentalisms and the state: Remaking polities, economies, and militance / Marty E.M., Appleby R.S., Garvey J.H., Kuran T. (eds.). – Chicago: The univ. of Chicago press, 1993. – 665 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gill A. Religion and comparative politics // Annual review of political science. – Palo Alto, CA, 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 117–138.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gill A. Religion and comparative politics // Annual review of political science. – Palo Alto, CA, 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 117–138.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Global index of religion and atheism. Redc opinion poll. Press release. – Mode of access: http://www.4buku.com/religion-and-atheism-25-redc-pdf.html (Дата посещения: 18.01.2013.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Global index of religion and atheism. Redc opinion poll. Press release. – Mode of access: http://www.4buku.com/religion-and-atheism-25-redc-pdf.html (Дата посещения: 18.01.2013.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J. Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, God, and Modernity / Mendieta E. (ed.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 2002. – 184 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas J. Religion and rationality: Essays on reason, God, and Modernity / Mendieta E. (ed.). – Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 2002. – 184 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J. Religion in the public sphere // European Journal of Philosophy. – Oxford, 2006. – Vol. 14, N 1. – P. 1–25.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas J. Religion in the public sphere // European Journal of Philosophy. – Oxford, 2006. – Vol. 14, N 1. – P. 1–25.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J. Notes on post-secular society // New Perspectives Quarterly. – Los Angeles, CA, 2008. – Vol. 25, N 4. – P. 17–29.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas J. Notes on post-secular society // New Perspectives Quarterly. – Los Angeles, CA, 2008. – Vol. 25, N 4. – P. 17–29.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J. An awareness of what is missing // An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age / Habermas J. et al. – Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2010. – P. 15–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas J. An awareness of what is missing // An awareness of what is missing: Faith and reason in a post-secular age / Habermas J. et al. – Cambridge, Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2010. – P. 15–23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Habermas J., Ratzinger J. The dialectics of secularization: On reason and religion. – San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2006. – 85 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Habermas J., Ratzinger J. The dialectics of secularization: On reason and religion. – San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2006. – 85 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hallencreutz C., Westerlund D. Anti-secularist policies of religion // Questioning the secular state: The worldwide resurgence of religion in politics. – L.: Hurst, 1996. – P. 1–23.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hallencreutz C., Westerlund D. Anti-secularist policies of religion // Questioning the secular state: The worldwide resurgence of religion in politics. – L.: Hurst, 1996. – P. 1–23.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Luckmann T. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. – L.: Macmillan, 1967. – P.128.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Luckmann T. The invisible religion: The problem of religion in modern society. – L.: Macmillan, 1967. – P.128.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mill J.St. Three essays on religon / L.J. Matz (ed.). – Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2009. – 306 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mill J.St. Three essays on religon / L.J. Matz (ed.). – Peterborough, Ont.: Broadview Press, 2009. – 306 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Norris P., Inglehart I. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. – N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2011. – 375 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Norris P., Inglehart I. Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. – N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2011. – 375 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taylor Ch. The dynamic of democratic exclusion // Journal of democracy. – Baltimore, MD, 1998. – Vol. 9, N 4. – P. 143–156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taylor Ch. The dynamic of democratic exclusion // Journal of democracy. – Baltimore, MD, 1998. – Vol. 9, N 4. – P. 143–156.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taylor Ch. Varietes of religion today: William James revisited. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 2002. – 127 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taylor Ch. Varietes of religion today: William James revisited. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 2002. – 127 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Taylor Ch. A secular age. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 2007. – 896 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Taylor Ch. A secular age. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 2007. – 896 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Warner R.S.Work in progress toward a new paradigm in the sociology of religion // American journal of sociology. – Chicago, 1993. – Vol. 98, N 5. – P. 1044–1093. – Mode of access: http://www.zjshkx.com/Upload/Article/2008-1/warner.pdf (Дата посещения: 16.02.2013.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Warner R.S.Work in progress toward a new paradigm in the sociology of religion // American journal of sociology. – Chicago, 1993. – Vol. 98, N 5. – P. 1044–1093. – Mode of access: http://www.zjshkx.com/Upload/Article/2008-1/warner.pdf (Дата посещения: 16.02.2013.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilson B.R. Religion in secular society: A sociological comment. – L.: C.A. Watts and C, 1966. – 252 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilson B.R. Religion in secular society: A sociological comment. – L.: C.A. Watts and C, 1966. – 252 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ziebertz H.-G., Riegel U. Europe: A post-secular society? // International journal of practical theology. – Berlin, 2010. – Vol. 13, N 2. – P. 293–308.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ziebertz H.-G., Riegel U. Europe: A post-secular society? // International journal of practical theology. – Berlin, 2010. – Vol. 13, N 2. – P. 293–308.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
