politscienceПолитическая наукаPolitical science1998-1775ИНИОН РАНpolitscience-320Research ArticleСОСТОЯНИЕ ДИСЦИПЛИНЫПОЛУПРЕЗИДЕНТСКАЯ СИСТЕМА: СОДЕРЖАНИЕ ПОНЯТИЯ И ОСНОВНЫЕ ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКИSemi-presidential systems: Concept definition and main featuresМаркаровАлександр АлександровичMarkarovA. A.amarkarov@ysu.amЕреванский государственный университет ; Институт стран СНГРоссия20141105202301Формы правления в современном мире3450Copyright © Маркаров А.А., 20232023Маркаров А.А.Markarov A.A.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/320

Статья посвящена теоретическому анализу современного дискурса по проблеме полупрезидентской формы правления. Проанализированы основные определения полупрезиденциализма, их преимущества и недостатки. Представлены критерии для построения типологии полупрезидентской системы, а также основные преимущества и недостатки этой формы правления

полупрезидентская форма правленияпрезидентпремьер-министрsemi-presidential systempresidentprime-ministerReferencesЗазнаев О.И. Полупрезидентская система: Теоретические и прикладные аспекты. - Казань: Казанский гос. ун-т, 2006. - 374 с.Зазнаев О.И. Полупрезидентская система: Теоретические и прикладные аспекты. - Казань: Казанский гос. ун-т, 2006. - 374 с.Bahro H., Bernhard H.B., Ernst V. Duverger’s concept: Semi-presidential government revisited // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 1998. - Vol. 34. - P. 201-224.Bahro H., Bernhard H.B., Ernst V. Duverger’s concept: Semi-presidential government revisited // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 1998. - Vol. 34. - P. 201-224.Bernhard M. Semipresidentialism, charisma, and democratic institutions in Poland // Presidential institutions and democratic politics comparing regional and national contexts / K. von Mettenheim (ed.). - Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1997. - P. 177-203.Bernhard M. Semipresidentialism, charisma, and democratic institutions in Poland // Presidential institutions and democratic politics comparing regional and national contexts / K. von Mettenheim (ed.). - Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1997. - P. 177-203.Blondel J. Dual leadership in the contemporary world // Parliamentary versus presidential government / A. Lijphart (ed.). - N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1994. - P. 162-172.Blondel J. Dual leadership in the contemporary world // Parliamentary versus presidential government / A. Lijphart (ed.). - N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1994. - P. 162-172.Colton T.J., Skach C. The Russian predicament // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2005. - Vol. 16 (3). - P. 113-126.Colton T.J., Skach C. The Russian predicament // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2005. - Vol. 16 (3). - P. 113-126.Duverger, M. A new political system model: Semi-presidential government // European journal of political research. - Amsterdam, 1980. - Vol. 8. - P. 165-187.Duverger, M. A new political system model: Semi-presidential government // European journal of political research. - Amsterdam, 1980. - Vol. 8. - P. 165-187.Elgie R. Models of executive politics: A framework for the study of executive power relations in parliamentary and semi-presidential regimes // Political studies. - Oxford; Malden, 1997. - Vol. 45. - P. 217-231.Elgie R. Models of executive politics: A framework for the study of executive power relations in parliamentary and semi-presidential regimes // Political studies. - Oxford; Malden, 1997. - Vol. 45. - P. 217-231.Elgie R. Variations on a theme // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2005. - Vol. 16(3). - P. 98-112.Elgie R. Variations on a theme // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2005. - Vol. 16(3). - P. 98-112.Lijphart A. Constitutional design for divided societies // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2004. - Vol. 15 (2). - P. 96-109.Lijphart A. Constitutional design for divided societies // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2004. - Vol. 15 (2). - P. 96-109.Linz J.J. Presidential and parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? // The failure of presidential democracy / J.J. Linz, A. Valenzuela (eds). - Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1994. - Vol. 1. - P. 3-81.Linz J.J. Presidential and parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference? // The failure of presidential democracy / J.J. Linz, A. Valenzuela (eds). - Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1994. - Vol. 1. - P. 3-81.Martinez R. Semi-presidentialism: A comparative study: Paper presented at ECPR joint sessions, Workshop 13. Designing institutions, Mannheim, Germany, 26-31 March. - Mannheim, 1999. - 56 p.Martinez R. Semi-presidentialism: A comparative study: Paper presented at ECPR joint sessions, Workshop 13. Designing institutions, Mannheim, Germany, 26-31 March. - Mannheim, 1999. - 56 p.Pasquino G. Semi-presidentialism: a political model at work // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 1997. - Vol. 31. - P. 128-137.Pasquino G. Semi-presidentialism: a political model at work // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 1997. - Vol. 31. - P. 128-137.Protsyk O. Prime ministers’ identity in semi-presidential regimes: Constitutional norms and cabinet formation outcomes // European journal of political research. - Wiley-Blackwell, 2005. - Vol. 44. - P. 721-748.Protsyk O. Prime ministers’ identity in semi-presidential regimes: Constitutional norms and cabinet formation outcomes // European journal of political research. - Wiley-Blackwell, 2005. - Vol. 44. - P. 721-748.Protsyk O. Intra-executive competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism // Political studies. - Oxford; Malden, 2006. - Vol. 54. - P. 219-244.Protsyk O. Intra-executive competition between President and Prime Minister: Patterns of institutional conflict and cooperation under semi-presidentialism // Political studies. - Oxford; Malden, 2006. - Vol. 54. - P. 219-244.Roper S.D. Are all semipresidential regimes the same? A comparison of premier-presidential regimes // Comparative politics. - N.Y., 2002. - Vol. 34 (3). - P. 253-272.Roper S.D. Are all semipresidential regimes the same? A comparison of premier-presidential regimes // Comparative politics. - N.Y., 2002. - Vol. 34 (3). - P. 253-272.Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering. An inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. - N.Y.: New York univ. press, 1994. - 219 p.Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering. An inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. - N.Y.: New York univ. press, 1994. - 219 p.Semi-presidentialism in Europe / R. Elgie (ed.). - Oxford: Oxford univ. press. - 1999. - 324 p.Semi-presidentialism in Europe / R. Elgie (ed.). - Oxford: Oxford univ. press. - 1999. - 324 p.Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge univ. press, 1992. - 316 p.Shugart M.S., Carey J.M. Presidents and assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge univ. press, 1992. - 316 p.Skach C. Borrowing Constitutional designs: Constitutional law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 2005. - 151 p.Skach C. Borrowing Constitutional designs: Constitutional law in Weimar Germany and the French Fifth Republic. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 2005. - 151 p.О'Neil P. Presidential power in post-communist Europe: The Hungarian case in comparative perspective // Journal of communist studies. - L.: Frank Cass, 1993. - Vol. 9 (3). - P. 177-201.О'Neil P. Presidential power in post-communist Europe: The Hungarian case in comparative perspective // Journal of communist studies. - L.: Frank Cass, 1993. - Vol. 9 (3). - P. 177-201.О'Neil P. Hungary: political transition and executive conflict: The balance or fragmentation of power? // Postcommunist Presidents / R. Taras (ed.). - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1997. - P. 195-224.О'Neil P. Hungary: political transition and executive conflict: The balance or fragmentation of power? // Postcommunist Presidents / R. Taras (ed.). - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1997. - P. 195-224.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.