<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-328</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>КОНЦЕПЦИЯ ВЕТО-ИГРОКОВ: НОВЫЙ ПОДХОД В ИЗУЧЕНИИ ФОРМ ПРАВЛЕНИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The concept of veto players: A new approach to the study of forms of government</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Помигуев</surname><given-names>Илья Александрович</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pomiguev</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">pomilya@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">ИНИОН РАН<country>Россия</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>11</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Формы правления в современном мире</issue-title><fpage>199</fpage><lpage>210</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Помигуев И.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Помигуев И.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pomiguev I.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/328">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/328</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье представлены основные положения концепции вето-игроков, предложенной Дж. Цебелисом. Рассматриваются ключевые понятия, используемые в данной концепции, принципы и способы определения вето-игроков, результаты их взаимодействия и влияния на политическую систему. Кроме того, в статье проанализированы преимущества и недостатки концепции, перспективы ее дальнейшего применения для исследования российской политики.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article presents the main ideas of the of G. Tsebelis' veto-players theory. The author examines key terms used in this concept, principles and methods of definition of the veto players, the results of their interaction and influence on the political system. In addition, the author analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the concept, prospects of its further application in Russia.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>вето-игроки</kwd><kwd>политические институты</kwd><kwd>стабильность политики</kwd><kwd>законодательный процесс</kwd><kwd>Цебелис</kwd><kwd>veto-players</kwd><kwd>political institutions</kwd><kwd>political stability</kwd><kwd>legislative process</kwd><kwd>Tsebelis</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зазнаев О.И. Индексный анализ полупрезидентских государств Европы и постсоветского пространства // Полис. - М., 2007. - № 2. - С. 146-164.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Зазнаев О.И. Индексный анализ полупрезидентских государств Европы и постсоветского пространства // Полис. - М., 2007. - № 2. - С. 146-164.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Curini L., Zucchini F. Testing the law-making theories in a parliamentary democracy: a roll call analysis of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, (1988-2008) // Reform processes and policy change: Veto players and decision-making in modern democracies. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010. - P. 189-203.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Curini L., Zucchini F. Testing the law-making theories in a parliamentary democracy: a roll call analysis of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, (1988-2008) // Reform processes and policy change: Veto players and decision-making in modern democracies. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010. - P. 189-203.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ganghof S., Bräuninger, T. Government status and legislative behaviour: Partisan veto players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany // Party politics. - L., 2006. - N 12. - P. 521-539.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ganghof S., Bräuninger, T. Government status and legislative behaviour: Partisan veto players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany // Party politics. - L., 2006. - N 12. - P. 521-539.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hug S., Tsebelis G. Veto players and referendums around the world // Journal of theoretical politics. - Thousand Oaks, 2002. - Vol. 14, N 4 - P. 466-486.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hug S., Tsebelis G. Veto players and referendums around the world // Journal of theoretical politics. - Thousand Oaks, 2002. - Vol. 14, N 4 - P. 466-486.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">König T., Tsebelis G., Debus M. Reform processes and policy change: veto players and decision-making in modern democracies / T. König (ed.). - N.Y.: Springer Science+ Business Media, 2010. - 283 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">König T., Tsebelis G., Debus M. Reform processes and policy change: veto players and decision-making in modern democracies / T. König (ed.). - N.Y.: Springer Science+ Business Media, 2010. - 283 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">König T. Bicameralism and party politics in Germany: an empirical social choice analysis // Political studies. - Oxford, 2001. - N 49. - P. 411-437.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">König T. Bicameralism and party politics in Germany: an empirical social choice analysis // Political studies. - Oxford, 2001. - N 49. - P. 411-437.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Konig T., Troger V. Budgetary politics and veto players // Swiss political science review. - Zuerich, 2005. - N 11. - P. 47-75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konig T., Troger V. Budgetary politics and veto players // Swiss political science review. - Zuerich, 2005. - N 11. - P. 47-75.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Merkel W. Institutions and reform policy: Three case studies on the veto player theory // Working papers. - Madrid: Huan March Institute, 2003. - Mode of access: http://www.exu.sk/material/temac/merkel/veto_player_paper_done.doc (Дата посещения: 15.08.2013.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merkel W. Institutions and reform policy: Three case studies on the veto player theory // Working papers. - Madrid: Huan March Institute, 2003. - Mode of access: http://www.exu.sk/material/temac/merkel/veto_player_paper_done.doc (Дата посещения: 15.08.2013.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rowley C.K., Schneider F. Readings in public choice and constitutional political economy. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2008. - 625 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rowley C.K., Schneider F. Readings in public choice and constitutional political economy. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2008. - 625 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 1. - 441 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 1. - 441 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 2. - 664 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 2. - 664 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G. Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 1995. - N 25. - P. 289-326.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G. Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 1995. - N 25. - P. 289-326.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G. Nested games: rational choice in a comparative perspective. - Berkeley: Univ. of California press, 1990. - 288 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G. Nested games: rational choice in a comparative perspective. - Berkeley: Univ. of California press, 1990. - 288 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G. Veto players and institutional analysis // Governance: an international journal of policy and administration. - Los Angeles, 2000. - Vol. 13, N 4. - P. 441-474.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G. Veto players and institutional analysis // Governance: an international journal of policy and administration. - Los Angeles, 2000. - Vol. 13, N 4. - P. 441-474.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: an empirical analysis // American political science review. - Cambridge, 1999. - N 93. - P. 591-608.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: an empirical analysis // American political science review. - Cambridge, 1999. - N 93. - P. 591-608.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G., Garrett G. Agenda setting power, power indices, and decision making in the European Union // International review of law and economics. - N.Y., 1996. - Vol. 3, N 16. - P. 345-361.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G., Garrett G. Agenda setting power, power indices, and decision making in the European Union // International review of law and economics. - N.Y., 1996. - Vol. 3, N 16. - P. 345-361.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsebelis G., Rizova T. Presidential conditional agenda setting in the former communist countries // Comparative political studies. - Seattle, 2007. - Vol. 40, N 10. - P. 1155-1182.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsebelis G., Rizova T. Presidential conditional agenda setting in the former communist countries // Comparative political studies. - Seattle, 2007. - Vol. 40, N 10. - P. 1155-1182.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Volcansek M.L. Constitutional courts as veto players: Divorce and decrees in Italy // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 2001. - N 39. - P. 347-372.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Volcansek M.L. Constitutional courts as veto players: Divorce and decrees in Italy // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 2001. - N 39. - P. 347-372.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
