<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31249/poln/2019.01.03</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-677</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОСТОЯНИЕ ДИСЦИПЛИНЫ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Прогнозные рынки: Опыт прогнозирования результатов российских выборов без опросов населения</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Prediction markets: forecasting electoral outcomes of Russian elections without public opinion polls</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Баскакова</surname><given-names>Юлия Михайловна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Baskakova</surname><given-names>Yulia</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">jbaskakova@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Институт социологии Федерального научно-исследовательского социологического центра Российской академии наук<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>05</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title>Выборы и электоральные исследования</issue-title><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>66</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Баскакова Ю.М., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Баскакова Ю.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Baskakova Y.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/677">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/677</self-uri><abstract><p>Статья анализирует результаты цикла исследований рынка электоральных прогнозов в ходе избирательных кампаний 2016 и 2018 гг., реализованных Всероссийским центром общественного мнения (ВЦИОМ) в партнерстве с компанией Prediki. Дается оценка эффективности применения прогнозных рынков для предсказания результатов выборов в России. Отмечено, что для федеральных выборов точность рынка сопоставима с точностью прогнозов на основе опросов, тогда как на уровне регионов, в условиях отсутствия в публичном пространстве опросных данных, рынки оказались неточными.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>In 2016 and 2018 Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) launched the first in Russia electoral prediction market to forecast the election outcome for the State Duma and President. The paper compares effectiveness of this market to forecasts based on public opinion polls. It demonstrates that prediction markets performed quite well at the national level but are not efficient enough at the regional level where there are no publicly available polls.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>прогнозирование</kwd><kwd>электоральные исследования</kwd><kwd>прогнозные рынки</kwd><kwd>опросы</kwd><kwd>electoral forecast</kwd><kwd>prediction markets</kwd><kwd>likely voters</kwd><kwd>political polls</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Баскакова Ю.М. Опыт прогнозирования итогов выборов с применением экспертных оценок // Социологические исследования. - М., 2013. - № 1. - С. 42-51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Баскакова Ю.М. Опыт прогнозирования итогов выборов с применением экспертных оценок // Социологические исследования. - М., 2013. - № 1. - С. 42-51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Баскакова Ю.М. Приемы и методы политического прогнозирования в 2016-2018 гг. // Выборы на фоне Крыма: Электоральный цикл 2016-2018 и перспективы политического транзита / Под ред. В. Федорова. - М., 2018. - [в печати].</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Баскакова Ю.М. Приемы и методы политического прогнозирования в 2016-2018 гг. // Выборы на фоне Крыма: Электоральный цикл 2016-2018 и перспективы политического транзита / Под ред. В. Федорова. - М., 2018. - [в печати].</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хайек Ф. Использование знаний в обществе. Индивидуализм и экономический порядок. - М.: Изограф, 2000. - 256 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Хайек Ф. Использование знаний в обществе. Индивидуализм и экономический порядок. - М.: Изограф, 2000. - 256 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шуровьески Д. Мудрость толпы. - М.: Вильямс, 2007. - 304 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Шуровьески Д. Мудрость толпы. - М.: Вильямс, 2007. - 304 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Berg J., Nelson F., Rietz T. Prediction market accuracy in the long run // International journal of forecasting. - Medford, Massachusetts, 2008. - Vol. 24, N 2. - P. 285-300.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Berg J., Nelson F., Rietz T. Prediction market accuracy in the long run // International journal of forecasting. - Medford, Massachusetts, 2008. - Vol. 24, N 2. - P. 285-300.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Deimer S., Poblete J. Real-money vs. play-money forecasting accuracy // Journal of prediction markets. - Buckingham, 2011. - N 4. - P. 21-58. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Deimer S., Poblete J. Real-money vs. play-money forecasting accuracy // Journal of prediction markets. - Buckingham, 2011. - N 4. - P. 21-58. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Erikson R., Wlezien Ch. Are political markets really superior to polls as election predictors? // Public opinion quarterly. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2008. - Vol. 72. - P. 19-21.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Erikson R., Wlezien Ch. Are political markets really superior to polls as election predictors? // Public opinion quarterly. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2008. - Vol. 72. - P. 19-21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rhode P., Strumpf K. The long history of political betting markets: An international perspective // Oxford handbook on the economics of gambling / V. Leigthon, D. Siegel (eds). - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2013. - P. 560-587.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rhode P., Strumpf K. The long history of political betting markets: An international perspective // Oxford handbook on the economics of gambling / V. Leigthon, D. Siegel (eds). - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2013. - P. 560-587.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graefe A. Political markets // SAGE Handbook of electoral behaviour. - Sage, UK, 2016. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graefe A. Political markets // SAGE Handbook of electoral behaviour. - Sage, UK, 2016. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Graefe A. Prediction market performance in the 2016 U.S. presidential election // Foresight: The international journal of applied forecasting. - Medford, MA, 2017. - N 45. - P. 38-42.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Graefe A. Prediction market performance in the 2016 U.S. presidential election // Foresight: The international journal of applied forecasting. - Medford, MA, 2017. - N 45. - P. 38-42.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Polls versus prediction markets. Who said Brexit was a surprise? // Economist. - L., 2016. - Jun. 24th. - Mode of access: https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/ 2016/06/polls-versus-prediction-markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polls versus prediction markets. Who said Brexit was a surprise? // Economist. - L., 2016. - Jun. 24th. - Mode of access: https://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/ 2016/06/polls-versus-prediction-markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Prediction markets: Does money matter? / Servan-Schreiber E., Wolfers J., Pennock D., Galebach D. // Electronic markets. - Leipzig, 2014. - Vol. 14, N 3. - P. 243-251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Prediction markets: Does money matter? / Servan-Schreiber E., Wolfers J., Pennock D., Galebach D. // Electronic markets. - Leipzig, 2014. - Vol. 14, N 3. - P. 243-251.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothschild D. Forecasting elections: Comparing prediction markets, polls, and their biases // Public opinion quarterly. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2009. - Vol. 73, N 5. - P. 895-916.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothschild D. Forecasting elections: Comparing prediction markets, polls, and their biases // Public opinion quarterly. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2009. - Vol. 73, N 5. - P. 895-916.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rothschild D., Sethi R. Wishful thinking, manipulation, and the wisdom of crowds: Evidence from a political betting market // Research Gate. - 2016. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rothschild D., Sethi R. Wishful thinking, manipulation, and the wisdom of crowds: Evidence from a political betting market // Research Gate. - 2016. - Mode of access: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292615991_Political_markets (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">The journal of prediction markets. - Mode of access: http://www.ubplj.org/index.php/jpm (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">The journal of prediction markets. - Mode of access: http://www.ubplj.org/index.php/jpm (Accessed: 06.11.2018.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
