References

politscience

Политическая наука

Political science

1998-1775

ИНИОН РАН

10.31249/poln/2019.03.11

politscience-713

Research Article

ПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬ

Власть и авторитет в Европейском союзе: «Цари горы» и «большие коалиции»

Power and authority in the European Union: «Kings of the hill» and «grand coalitions»

Сорбалэ

Алексей Борисович

Sorbale

A. B.

asorbale@hse.ru

Научно-исследовательский университет Высшая школа экономикиРоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation

2019

12052023

Власть, мощь и влияние государств в мировой политике

200221

2023

Сорбалэ А.Б.

Sorbale A.B.

Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/713

Как распределяются власть и авторитет в Европейском союзе? Какую роль играет государственная состоятельность в рамках отношений между уровнями власти в ЕС? Автор статьи стремится ответить на эти вопросы, обращаясь к двум ключевым подходам к анализу Европейского союза как многоуровневой системы управления: структурно-акторному подходу и подходу консоциативной демократии. В то время как сторонники структурно-акторного подхода воспринимают ЕС как иерархичную систему, где один из уровней власти всегда оказывается в положении доминирования и может диктовать свои правила игры, теоретиков европейского консоциативизма больше интересуют вопросы, связанные с процессом принятия решений в условиях «больших коалиций», горизонтальной и вертикальной подотчетности и демократического дефицита.

How is power and authority distributed in the European Union? What role does state capacity play in the framework of relations between the levels of authority in the EU? In this article, we seek to answer these questions by addressing two key approaches to the analysis of the European Union as a multi-level system of gover- nance: the structural-actor approach and the approach of consociational democracy. While supporters of the structural-actor approach perceive the EU as a hierarchical system, where one of the levels of power is always in a position of dominance and can dictate its rules of the game, the theoreticians of European consociationalism are more interested in the issues related to the decision-making process under the conditions of «grand coalitions», horizontal and vertical accountability and democratic deficit.

властьавторитетструктурно-акторный подходконсоциативная демократиягосударственная состоятельностьpowerauthoritystructural-actor approachconsociational democracystate capacity

References1

Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. Траектории режимных трансформаций и типы государственной состоятельности // Полис. Политические исследования. - М., 2012. - № 2. - С. 8-30.

Стукал Д.К., Хавенсон Т.Е. Моделирование государственной состоятельности постсоциалистических стран // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. - СПб., 2012. - № 1. - С. 233-260.

Adler-Nissen R. Opting out of the European Union: diplomacy, sovereignty and European integration. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2014. - 266 p.

Andeweg R.B. Consociational democracy // Annual Review of Political Science. - Palo Alto, 2000. - N 1. - P. 509-536.

Armingeon K. Interest intermediation: The cases of consociational democracy and corporatism. Comparative Democratic Politics. A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Research. - L.: Sage, 2002. - 165 p.

Attina F. The voting behaviour of the European Parliament members and the problem of the Europarties // European Journal of Political Research. - L., 1990. - N 5. - P. 557-579.

Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states / Ed. by P.J. Katzenstein. - Wisconsin: Univ. of Wisconsin press, 1978. - 344 p.

Billiet S. From GATT to the WTO: The internal struggle for external competences in the EU // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. - L., 2006. - N 5. - P. 899-919.

Bogaards M. Democracy and Power-Sharing in Multinational States: Thematic Introduction // International Journal on Multicultural Societies. - 2006. - Vol. 8, N 2. - P. 119-126.

Bogaards M., Crepaz M.M.L. Consociational interpretations of the European Union // European Union Politics. - Lisbon, 2002. - N 3. - P. 357-381.

Bringing the state back in / P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, T. Skocpol (eds.). - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1985. - 404 p.

Burgess M. Federalism and the European Union: the building of Europe, 1950-2000. - L., 2002. - 290 p.

Butenschøn N.A. Conflict management in plural societies: The consociational democracy formula // Scandinavian Political Studies. - L., 1985. - N 1/2. - P. 85-103.

Carlsnaes W. The agency-structure problem in foreign policy analysis // International studies quarterly. - Oxford, 1992. - N 3. - P. 245-270.

Checkel J.T. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change // International organization. - Cambridge, 2001. - N 3. - P. 553-588.

Consociational Democracy: Political Accommodation in Segmented Societies / Ed. by K. McRae. - Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen's univ. press, 1974. - 312 p.

Cooper I. The watchdogs of subsidiarity: National parliaments and the logic of arguing in the EU // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. - L., 2006. - N 2. - P. 281-304.

Costa O., Foret F. The European Consociational Model: An Exportable Institutional Design? // European Foreign Affairs Review. - Amsterdam, 2005. - N 4. - P. 501-516.

Deliberating across deep divides / R.C. Luskin, I. O'Flynn, J.S. Fishkin, D. Russell // Political Studies. - Boston, 2014. - N 1. - P. 116-135.

Dixon P. The politics of conflict: A constructivist critique of consociational and civil society theories // Nations and Nationalism. - L., 2012. - N 1. - P. 98-121.

Fearon J.D. Bargaining, enforcement, and international cooperation // International organization. - Cambridge, 1998. - N 2. - P. 269-305.

Frognier A.P. The mixed nature of Belgian cabinets between majority rule and consociationalism // European Journal of Political Research. - L., 1988. - N 2. - P. 207-228.

Gabel M.J. The endurance of supranational governance: A consociational interpretation of the European Union // Comparative Politics. - N.Y.; Chicago, Ill., 1998. - P. 463-475.

Garry J. Potentially Voting across the Divide in Deeply Divided Places: Ethnic Catch-All Voting in Consociational Northern Ireland // Political Studies. - Boston, 2014. - P. 2-19.

Gheyle N., De Ville F. Outside Lobbying and the Politicization of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership // Lobbying in the European Union. - Cham, 2019. - P. 339-354.

Golub J. Sovereignty and subsidiarity in EU environmental policy // Political Studies. - Boston, 1996. - N 4. - P. 686-703.

Haas P.M. Compliance with EU directives: insights from international relations and comparative politics // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 1998. - N 1. - P. 17-37.

Haddad S. Lebanon: from consociationalism to conciliation // Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. - Oxford, 2009. - N 3/4. - P. 398-416.

Heidbreder E.G. Structuring the European administrative space: Policy instruments of multi-level administration // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 2011. - N 5. - P. 709-727.

Hille P., Knill C. ‘It’s the Bureaucracy, Stupid’ The Implementation of the Acquis Communautaire in EU Candidate Countries, 1999-2003 // European Union Politics. - L., 2006. - N 4. - P. 531-552.

Horowitz D.L. Conciliatory institutions and constitutional processes in post-conflict states // William and Mary Law Review. - Williamsburg, VA, 2008. - N 49. - P. 1213-1248.

Horowitz D.L. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. - Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. - 711 p.

Hug S., Schulz T. Referendums in the EU’s constitution building process // The Review of International Organizations. - L., 2007. - N 2. - P. 177-218.

Jérôme B., Vaillant N.G. The French rejection of the European constitution: An empirical analysis // European Journal of Political Economy. - Amsterdam, 2005. - N 4. - P. 1085-1092.

Jervis R. Cooperation under the security dilemma // World politics. - Baltimore, Md., 1978. - N 2. - P. 167-214.

Jolly M. A demos for the European Union? // Politics. - L., 2005. - N 1. - P. 12-18.

Jordan A., Jeppesen T. EU environmental policy: adapting to the principle of subsidiarity? // European Environment. - Hoboken, NJ, 2000. - N 2. - P. 64-74.

Kaiser A. Alternation, inclusion and the European Union // European Union Politics. - L., 2002. - N 4. - P. 445-458.

Kant I. Perpetual peace: A philosophical sketch. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1970. - 59 p.

Keohane R.O. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. - Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 2005. - 320 p.

Keohane R.O., Moravcsik A., Slaughter A.M. Legalized dispute resolution: Interstate and transnational // International organization. - Cambridge, 2000. - N 3. - P. 457-488.

Kohler-Koch B. Changing patterns of interest intermediation in the European Union // Government and Opposition. - Cambridge, 1994. - N 2. - P. 166-180.

Kohler-Koch B. Organized Interests in the EC and the European Parliament // European Integration online Papers (EIoP). - Wien, 1997. - N 9. - P. 1-15.

Kraus P. Legitimacy, democracy and diversity in the European Union // International Journal on Multicultural Societies. - Paris, 2006. - N 2. - P. 203-244.

Legitimacy and the European Union: The contested polity / T. Banchoff, M. Smith (eds.). - L.: Routledge, 2005. - 240 p.

Lehmbruch G. Consociational democracy and corporatism in Switzerland // Publius: The journal offederalism. - 1993. - Vol. 23, N 2. - P. 43-60

Lijphart A. Consociational democracy // World politics. - Baltimore, Md., 1969. - N 2. - P. 207-225.

Linos K. How can international organizations shape national welfare states? Evidence from compliance with European Union directives // Comparative Political Studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007. - N 5. - P. 547-570.

Magnette P. European governance and civic participation: beyond elitist citizenship? // Political studies. - Boston, 2003. - N 1. - P. 144-160.

Mendrinou M. Non-compliance and the European commission's role in integration // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 1996. - N 1. - P. 1-22.

Mitchell R.B. Regime design matters: intentional oil pollution and treaty compliance // International organization. - Cambridge, 1994. - N 3. - P. 425-458.

Moravcsik A. Negotiating the Single European Act: national interests and conventional statecraft in the European Community // International organization. - Cambridge, 1991. - N 1. - P. 19-56.

Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace. - N.Y.: Knopf, 1950. - 618 p.

Noel S.J.R. From power sharing to democracy: Post-conflict institutions in ethnically divided societies. - Montreal, Quebec: McGill-Queen's univ. press, 2005. - 312 p.

Nye J.S. Peace in parts: Integration and conflict in regional organization. - Boston: Little, Brown, 1971. - 136 p.

Paraskevopoulos C.J. Social capital, institutional learning and European regional policy: Evidence from Greece // Regional & Federal Studies. - L., 1998. - N 3. - P. 31-64.

Peters B.G. Agenda-setting in the European Community // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 1994. - N 1. - P. 9-26.

Pollack M.A. Principal-Agent Analysis and International Delegation: Red Herrings, Theoretical Clarifications and Empirical Disputes // SSRN Electronic Journal. - 2007. - P. 1-25.

Reilly B. Institutional designs for diverse democracies: Consociationalism, centripetalism and communalism compared // European Political Science. - L., 2012. - N 2. - P. 259-270.

Richardson K. Big business and the European agenda. - Sussex: Sussex European Institute, 2000. - 30 p. - (SEI working paper; N 35).

Sandholtz W., Stone Sweet A. European Integration and Supranational Governance 1 st Edition. - Oxford: Oxford University Press. - 400 p.

Schneider G., Finke D., Baltz K. With a little help from the state: interest intermediation in the domestic pre-negotiations of EU legislation // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 2007. - N 3. - P. 444-459.

Selway J., Templeman K. The myth of consociationalism? Conflict reduction in divided societies // Comparative Political Studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2012. - N 12. - P. 1542-1571.

Simmons B.A. Compliance with international agreements // Annual review of political science. - N.Y., 1998. - N 1. - P. 75-93.

Simonsen S.G. Addressing ethnic divisions in post-conflict institution-building: Lessons from recent cases // Security Dialogue. - L., 2005. - N 3. - P. 297-318.

Smooha S., Hanf T. Conflict-regulation in deeply divided societies // International Journal of Comparative Sociology. - L., 1992. - N 33 (1/2). - P. 26-47.

Sustainable Democracy / Ed. by A. Przeworski. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1995. - 155 p.

Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars / P.G. Roeder, D.S. Rothchild (eds.). - Ithaca, NY: Cornell univ. press, 2005. - 406 p.

Sweet A.S., Sandholtz W. European integration and supranational governance // Journal of European public policy. - Oxford, 1997. - N 3. - P. 297-317.

Tallberg J. Paths to compliance: Enforcement, management, and the European Union // International organization. - Cambridge, 2002. - N 3. - P. 609-643.

Taylor R. Consociational theory. - L., 2009. - 416 p.

Toonen T.A.J., Steunenberg B., Voermans W. Saying No to a European Constitution: Dutch Revolt, Enigma or Pragmatism? // Zeitschrift für Staats-und Europawissenschaften. - Munchen, 2006. - N 4. - P. 594-619.

Toshkov D. Transposition of EU social policy in the new member states // Journal of European Social Policy. - L., 2007. - N 4. - P. 335-348.

Trauner F. Post-accession compliance with EU law in Bulgaria and Romania: a comparative perspective // Post-accession compliance in the EU’s new member states, European Integration online Papers (EIoP) / F. Schimmelfennig, F. Trauner (eds.).-2009. - Special Issue 2, Vol. 13, Art. 21. - P. 1-18. - Mode of access: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-021a.htm (accessed: 22.05.2019.)

Treib O. The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections // Journal of European Public Policy. - Oxford, 2014. - N 10. - P. 1541-1554.

Tsebelis G. Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism // British journal of political science. - L., 1995. - N 3. - P. 289-325.

Volpi V. Why Europe will not run the 21 st century: reflections on the need for a new European federation. - Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2011. - 275 p.

Waltz K.N. Neorealism and its Critics. - N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 1986. - 378 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.