politscienceПолитическая наукаPolitical science1998-1775ИНИОН РАН10.31249/poln/2019.03.12politscience-714Research ArticleПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬЛегитимация и обоснование политики: Анализ концептуальных разграниченийLegitimation and justification of policy: Analysis of conceptual distinctionsМясниковСтанислав АлександровичMyasnikovS. A.smyasnikov@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation20191205202303Власть, мощь и влияние государств в мировой политике222235Copyright © Мясников С.А., 20232023Мясников С.А.Myasnikov S.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/714

Статья посвящена проблеме концептуализации легитимности. Будучи одним из фундаментальных понятий политического анализа, легитимность служит для описания отношений власти, политического порядка, режима и отдельных институтов. В статье обосновывается релевантность изучения практик легитимации решений, действий, политики (policy), доказывается необходимость разграничения «легитимации» (legitimation) и «обоснования» (justification) политики, предлагается их концептуализация.

The article considers the problem of conceptualization of legitimacy. While being one of the fundamental concepts of political analysis, «legitimacy» describes the relationships of power, political order, regime, individual institutions, etc. The article argues for the relevance of studying the practice of decisions, actions, policy legitimation, proves the need to distinguish between «legitimation» and «justification» of policies, proposes their conceptualization.

легитимностьлегитимация политикиобоснование политикиполитический процесспубличная коммуникацияполитический цикланализ политикиlegitimacypolicy legitimationpolicy justificationpolitical processpublic communicationpolicy cyclepolicy analysisReferencesДюверже М. Политические институты и конституционное право // Социология власти. - М., 2011. - № 5. - C. 206-217.Дюверже М. Политические институты и конституционное право // Социология власти. - М., 2011. - № 5. - C. 206-217.Парсонс Т. Понятие общества: компоненты и их взаимоотношения // THESIS: Теория и история экономических и социальных институтов и систем. - М., 1993. - № 2. - С. 94-122.Парсонс Т. Понятие общества: компоненты и их взаимоотношения // THESIS: Теория и история экономических и социальных институтов и систем. - М., 1993. - № 2. - С. 94-122.Abulof U., Kornprobst M. Introduction: The politics of public justification // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 1. - P. 1-18.Abulof U., Kornprobst M. Introduction: The politics of public justification // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 1. - P. 1-18.Alker H.R. The powers and pathologies of networks: Insights from the political cybernetics of Karl W. Deutsch and Norbert Wiener // European Journal of International Relations. - L., 2011. - Vol. 17, N 2. - P. 354-378.Alker H.R. The powers and pathologies of networks: Insights from the political cybernetics of Karl W. Deutsch and Norbert Wiener // European Journal of International Relations. - L., 2011. - Vol. 17, N 2. - P. 354-378.Cairney P. The Politics of Evidence Based Policy Making. - Stirling: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. - 137 p.Cairney P. The Politics of Evidence Based Policy Making. - Stirling: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. - 137 p.Chapman T.L. Audience beliefs and international organization legitimacy // International Organization. - Cambridge, 2009. - Vol. 63, N 4. - P. 733-764.Chapman T.L. Audience beliefs and international organization legitimacy // International Organization. - Cambridge, 2009. - Vol. 63, N 4. - P. 733-764.Dahl R. A Preface to Democratic Theory. - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1956. - 155 p.Dahl R. A Preface to Democratic Theory. - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1956. - 155 p.Del Sordi A., Dalmasso E. The Relation between External and Internal Authoritarian Legitimation: The Religious Foreign Policy of Morocco and Kazakhstan // Taiwan Journal of Democracy. - Taiwan, 2018. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 95-116.Del Sordi A., Dalmasso E. The Relation between External and Internal Authoritarian Legitimation: The Religious Foreign Policy of Morocco and Kazakhstan // Taiwan Journal of Democracy. - Taiwan, 2018. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 95-116.Dukalskis A., Gerschewski J. What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 251-268.Dukalskis A., Gerschewski J. What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 251-268.Easton D.A Systems Analysis of Political Life. - N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1965. - 507 p.Easton D.A Systems Analysis of Political Life. - N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1965. - 507 p.Goddard S.E., Krebs R.R. Rhetoric, legitimation, and grand strategy // Security Studies. - L., 2015. - Vol. 24, N 1. - P. 5-36.Goddard S.E., Krebs R.R. Rhetoric, legitimation, and grand strategy // Security Studies. - L., 2015. - Vol. 24, N 1. - P. 5-36.Hanberger A. Public policy and legitimacy: A historical policy analysis of the interplay of public policy and legitimacy // Policy Sciences. - Amsterdam, 2003. - Vol. 36, N 3/4. - P. 257-278.Hanberger A. Public policy and legitimacy: A historical policy analysis of the interplay of public policy and legitimacy // Policy Sciences. - Amsterdam, 2003. - Vol. 36, N 3/4. - P. 257-278.Holmes L. Legitimation and legitimacy in Russia revisited // Russian Politics from Lenin to Putin / S. Fortescue (ed.). - L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. - P. 101-126.Holmes L. Legitimation and legitimacy in Russia revisited // Russian Politics from Lenin to Putin / S. Fortescue (ed.). - L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. - P. 101-126.Hurd I. Legitimacy and authority in international politics // International organization. - Cambridge, 1999. - Vol. 53, N 2. - P. 379-408.Hurd I. Legitimacy and authority in international politics // International organization. - Cambridge, 1999. - Vol. 53, N 2. - P. 379-408.Johnson C., Dowd T.J., Ridgeway C.L. Legitimacy as a social process // Annual Review Sociology. - Palo Alto, California, 2006. - Vol. 32. - P. 53-78.Johnson C., Dowd T.J., Ridgeway C.L. Legitimacy as a social process // Annual Review Sociology. - Palo Alto, California, 2006. - Vol. 32. - P. 53-78.Lipset S.M. Political man. The social basis of politics. - N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959. - 586 p.Lipset S.M. Political man. The social basis of politics. - N.Y.: Doubleday, 1959. - 586 p.Lorch J., Bunk B. Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective // Democratization. - L., 2017. - Vol. 24, N 6. - P. 987-1005.Lorch J., Bunk B. Using civil society as an authoritarian legitimation strategy: Algeria and Mozambique in comparative perspective // Democratization. - L., 2017. - Vol. 24, N 6. - P. 987-1005.Ruef M., Scott W.R. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments // Administrative science quarterly. - Cornell, 1998. - Vol. 43, N 4. - P. 877-904.Ruef M., Scott W.R. A multidimensional model of organizational legitimacy: Hospital survival in changing institutional environments // Administrative science quarterly. - Cornell, 1998. - Vol. 43, N 4. - P. 877-904.Sidney M.S. Policy Formulation, Design and Tools // Handbook of Public Policy: Theory, Politics, and Methods / F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (eds.). - Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007. - P. 79-88.Sidney M.S. Policy Formulation, Design and Tools // Handbook of Public Policy: Theory, Politics, and Methods / F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (eds.). - Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2007. - P. 79-88.Smoke R. On the importance of policy legitimacy // Political Psychology. - Columbus, NC, 1994. - Vol. 15, N 1. - P. 97-110.Smoke R. On the importance of policy legitimacy // Political Psychology. - Columbus, NC, 1994. - Vol. 15, N 1. - P. 97-110.Social justice, legitimacy and the welfare state / S. Mau, B. Veghte (eds.). - Burlingotn, VT.: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007. - 233 p.Social justice, legitimacy and the welfare state / S. Mau, B. Veghte (eds.). - Burlingotn, VT.: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., 2007. - 233 p.Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches // Academy of management review. - N.Y., 1995. - Vol. 20, N 3. - P. 571-610.Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches // Academy of management review. - N.Y., 1995. - Vol. 20, N 3. - P. 571-610.Turcan R.V., Marinova S., Bakhtiar Rana M. Empirical studies on legitimation strategies: A case for international business research extension // Institutional Theory in International Business and Management / L. Tihanyi, T. Devinney, T. Pedersen (eds.). - Bingley, 2012. - P. 425-470.Turcan R.V., Marinova S., Bakhtiar Rana M. Empirical studies on legitimation strategies: A case for international business research extension // Institutional Theory in International Business and Management / L. Tihanyi, T. Devinney, T. Pedersen (eds.). - Bingley, 2012. - P. 425-470.von Haldenwang C. The relevance of legitimation - a new framework for analysis // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 269-286.von Haldenwang C. The relevance of legitimation - a new framework for analysis // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 269-286.von Soest C., Grauvogel J. Identity, procedures and performance: How authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 287-305.von Soest C., Grauvogel J. Identity, procedures and performance: How authoritarian regimes legitimize their rule // Contemporary Politics. - N.Y., 2017. - Vol. 23, N 3. - P. 287-305.Weber M. The three types of legitimate rule // Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions. - California, 1958. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 1-11.Weber M. The three types of legitimate rule // Berkeley Publications in Society and Institutions. - California, 1958. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 1-11.White J., Ypi L. On partisan political justification //American political science review. - Baltimore, MD, 2011. - Vol. 105, N 2. - P. 381-396.White J., Ypi L. On partisan political justification //American political science review. - Baltimore, MD, 2011. - Vol. 105, N 2. - P. 381-396.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.