<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31249/poln/2023.02.12</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-925</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Традиционные ценности как составляющая российской безопасности: исследование президентского дискурса 2012–2022 гг.</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Traditional values as a component of Russian security: a study of presidential discourse in 2012–2022</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бислер</surname><given-names>М. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bisler</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Матвей Александрович Бислер, студент бакалаврской программы «Мировая политика»</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Matvei Bisler</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">matvei.bisler@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московская высшая школа социальных и экономических наук</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>The Moscow school of social and economic sciences</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>06</day><month>06</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title>Идентичность, ценности и их влияние на политические процессы</issue-title><fpage>273</fpage><lpage>294</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Бислер М.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Бислер М.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bisler M.A.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/925">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/925</self-uri><abstract><p>   Идеологические трансформации властных элит в постсоветской России поместили традиционные ценности в мейнстрим политической дискуссии. Со временем идеологема традиционных ценностей все больше проникала в официальный дискурс и нормотворчество, что было охарактеризовано исследователями как «консервативный поворот». Существующие работы, в основном сосредоточенные на объяснении идеологического потенциала традиционных ценностей, недостаточно уделяют внимание другому процессу – позиционированию этих же ценностей в качестве составляющей российской безопасности. В этой статье предпринимается попытка объяснить связь традиционных ценностей с безопасностью при помощи дискурс-анализа в теоретических рамках Копенгагенской школы секьюритизации. Сконцентрировав внимание на начальном этапе секьюритизации, речевом акте, рассмотрели политический дискурс президента России с 2012 по 2022 г. На основе этих материалов выявлены закономерности в отношении содержания идеологемы традиционных ценностей и смысловой классификации угроз этимценностям. Кроме того, проиллюстрированы аргументы, связывающие традиционные ценности с национальной безопасностью. Традиционные ценности понимаются как инструмент объединения российского общества, делается особый акцент на модели семьи, высокой нравственности и преемственности поколений. При этом угрозой традиционным ценностям преимущественно выступает ценностный диктат коллективного Запада, что, как утверждается, может привести к потере суверенитета, усилению демографического кризиса и стиранию российской идентичности. В этой работе также предприняты первые шаги к осмыслению набирающих силу риторических и политических тенденций в России после 2022 г. и предложена основа для дальнейшего изучения традиционных ценностей через подход Копенгагенской школы.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>   Ideological transformations of the ruling elites in post-Soviet Russia have placed traditional values in the mainstream of political discourse. Over time, the ideologeme of traditional values increasingly infiltrated into the official discourse and legislation, which was characterized as a «conservative turn» by some researchers. Existing works, primarily focusing on explaining the ideological potential of traditional values, do not pay enough attention to another process – the positioning of the same values as a component of Russian security. This article attempts to explain the connection between traditional values and security using discourse analysis within the theoretical framework of the Copenhagen School of securitization. Focusing on the speech act as the initial stage of securitization, the political discourse of the President of Russia from 2012 to 2022 is analyzed. Basing on these materials, the author identifies consistent patterns in the meaning of traditional values and the semantic classification of threats to these values. In addition, arguments linking traditional values to national security are illustrated. Traditional values are perceived as a tool for uniting Russian society, with a special emphasis on family models, special morality, and intergenerational continuity. At the same time, the value dictate of the collective West is mainly perceived as a threat to traditional values, which, as it is argued, can lead to the loss of sovereignty, demographic crisis, and the erosion of the Russian identity. This work also takes the first steps towards the understanding of the emerging rhetorical and political trends in Russia after 2022 and provides a basis for further research of traditional values with the Copenhagen School approach.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>традиционные ценности</kwd><kwd>властная риторика</kwd><kwd>президентский дискурс</kwd><kwd>секьюритизация</kwd><kwd>национальная безопасность</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>traditional values</kwd><kwd>rhetoric of the ruling elites</kwd><kwd>presidential discourse</kwd><kwd>securitization</kwd><kwd>national security</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Курилла И. И. История как язык политики / И. И. Курилла // Новое Прошлое. – 2021. – № 1. – С. 104–126.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Agadjanian A. Tradition, morality and community: elaborating Orthodox identity in Putin’s Russia. Religion, state and society. 2017, Vol. 45, N 1, P. 39–60. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2016.1272893</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малинова О. Ю. «Духовные скрепы» как государственная идеология / О. Ю. Малинова // Россия в глобальной политике. – 2014. – № 5. – С. 113–122.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Albert M., Buzan B. Securitization, sectors and functional differentiation. Security dialogue. 2011, Vol. 42, N 4–5, P. 413–425. doi: 10.1177/0967010611418710</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Малинова О. Ю. Конституционный процесс как символическая политика: дискуссии о поправках к Конституции РФ, 1993–2020 / О. Ю. Малинова // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2021. – № 3. – С. 17–37. – doi: 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.03</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buzan B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J. Security: a new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998, 239 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Печерская Н. В. Перспективы Российской семейной политики: принуждение к традиции / Н. В. Печерская // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. – 2013. – № 4. – С. 94–105.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balzacq T. Enquiries into methods: A new framework for securitization analysis. In: Balzacq T. (ed.). Securitization theory: how security problems emerge and dissolve. London, New York: Routledge, 2011, P. 31–53.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Balzacq T., Léonard S., Ruzicka J. ‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases. International relations. 2016, Vol. 30, N 4, P. 494–531. doi: 10.1177/0047117815596590</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balzacq T., Léonard S., Ruzicka J. ‘Securitization’ revisited: theory and cases. International relations. 2016, Vol. 30, N 4, P. 494–531. doi: 10.1177/0047117815596590</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chandler A. Russia's laws on ‘non-traditional’ relationships as response to global norm diffusion. The international journal of human rights. 2021, Vol. 25, N 4, P. 616–638. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1789106</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chandler A. Russia's laws on ‘non-traditional’ relationships as response to global norm diffusion. The international journal of human rights. 2021, Vol. 25, N 4, P. 616–638. doi: 10.1080/13642987.2020.1789106</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chebankova E. Political ideologies in contemporary Russia. Montreal &amp; Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen’s university press, 2020, 376 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chebankova E. Political ideologies in contemporary Russia. Montreal &amp; Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen’s university press, 2020, 376 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Côté A. Agents without agency: assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory. Security dialogue. 2016, Vol. 47, N 6, P. 541–558. doi: 10.1177/0967010616672150</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Côté A. Agents without agency: assessing the role of the audience in securitization theory. Security dialogue. 2016, Vol. 47, N 6, P. 541–558. doi: 10.1177/0967010616672150</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Diesen G. Russian conservatism: managing change under permanent revolution. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021, 254 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Diesen G. Russian conservatism: managing change under permanent revolution. Lanham, Boulder, New York, London: Rowman &amp; Littlefield, 2021, 254 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edenborg E. Anti-Gender politics as discourse coalitions: Russia’s domestic and international promotion of “traditional values”. Problems of post-communism. 2021. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1987269</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edenborg E. Anti-Gender politics as discourse coalitions: Russia’s domestic and international promotion of “traditional values”. Problems of post-communism. 2021. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2021.1987269</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Edenborg E. Russia’s spectacle of “traditional values”: rethinking the politics of visibility. International feminist journal of politics. 2020, Vol. 22, N 1, P. 106–126. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2018.1560227</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Edenborg E. Russia’s spectacle of “traditional values”: rethinking the politics of visibility. International feminist journal of politics. 2020, Vol. 22, N 1, P. 106–126. doi: 10.1080/14616742.2018.1560227</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Engström M. Contemporary Russian Messianism and new Russian foreign policy. Contemporary security policy. 2014, Vol. 35, N 3, P. 356–379. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2014.965888</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engström M. Contemporary Russian Messianism and new Russian foreign policy. Contemporary security policy. 2014, Vol. 35, N 3, P. 356–379. doi: 10.1080/13523260.2014.965888</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Floyd R. Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures: what, and who, defines the ‘success’ of securitization? Cambridge review of international affairs. 2016, Vol. 26, N 2, P. 677–694. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Floyd R. Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures: what, and who, defines the ‘success’ of securitization? Cambridge review of international affairs. 2016, Vol. 26, N 2, P. 677–694. doi: 10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goncharenko G., Khadaroo, I. Disciplining human rights organisations through an accounting regulation: A case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia. Critical perspectives on accounting. 2020, Vol. 72. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102129</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goncharenko G., Khadaroo, I. Disciplining human rights organisations through an accounting regulation: A case of the ‘foreign agents’ law in Russia. Critical perspectives on accounting. 2020, Vol. 72. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102129</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kurilla I. I. History as a language of politics. The new past. 2021, N 1, P. 104–126. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriya-kak-yazyk-politiki?ysclid=lik96lrbwj507387047 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kurilla I. I. History as a language of politics. The new past. 2021, N 1, P. 104–126. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/istoriya-kak-yazyk-politiki?ysclid=lik96lrbwj507387047 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laine V. Evolution of Russia’s ‘others’ in presidential discourse in 2000–2020. In: Katri Pynnöniemi (ed.). Nexus of patriotism and militarism in Russia: A quest for internal cohesion. Helsinki: Helsinki university press, 2021, P. 49–80.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laine V. Evolution of Russia’s ‘others’ in presidential discourse in 2000–2020. In: Katri Pynnöniemi (ed.). Nexus of patriotism and militarism in Russia: A quest for internal cohesion. Helsinki: Helsinki university press, 2021, P. 49–80.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Laruelle M. Russia as an anti-liberal European civilization. In: Kolstø P., Blakkisrud H. (eds). The new Russian nationalism: imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–15. Edinburgh: Edinburgh university press, 2016, P. 275–297.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Laruelle M. Russia as an anti-liberal European civilization. In: Kolstø P., Blakkisrud H. (eds). The new Russian nationalism: imperialism, ethnicity and authoritarianism 2000–15. Edinburgh: Edinburgh university press, 2016, P. 275–297.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Loftus S. Insecurity &amp; the rise of nationalism in Putin’s Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 182 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Loftus S. Insecurity &amp; the rise of nationalism in Putin’s Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 182 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malinova O. Amending the Russian constitution as symbolic politics: 1993–2020. Polis. Political studies. 2021, N 3, P. 17–37. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.03 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malinova O. Amending the Russian constitution as symbolic politics: 1993–2020. Polis. Political studies. 2021, N 3, P. 17–37. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2021.03.03 (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Malinova O. “Spiritual bonds” as a state ideology. Russia in global affairs. 2014, Vol. 12, N 5, P. 113–122.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Malinova O. “Spiritual bonds” as a state ideology. Russia in global affairs. 2014, Vol. 12, N 5, P. 113–122.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Murayeva M. Traditional values and modern families: legal understanding of tradition and modernity in contemporary Russia. The journal of social policy studies. 2014, Vol. 12, N 4, P. 625–638.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Murayeva M. Traditional values and modern families: legal understanding of tradition and modernity in contemporary Russia. The journal of social policy studies. 2014, Vol. 12, N 4, P. 625–638.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Novitskaya A. Patriotism, sentiment, and male hysteria: Putin’s masculinity politics and the persecution of non-heterosexual Russians. NORMA. International journal for masculinity studies. 2017, Vol. 12, N 3–4, P. 302–318. doi: 10.1080/18902138.2017.1312957</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novitskaya A. Patriotism, sentiment, and male hysteria: Putin’s masculinity politics and the persecution of non-heterosexual Russians. NORMA. International journal for masculinity studies. 2017, Vol. 12, N 3–4, P. 302–318. doi: 10.1080/18902138.2017.1312957</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nuñez-Mietz F. Resisting human rights through securitization: Russia and Hungary against LGBT rights. Journal of human rights. 2019, Vol. 18, N 5, P. 543–563. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2019.1647100</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nuñez-Mietz F. Resisting human rights through securitization: Russia and Hungary against LGBT rights. Journal of human rights. 2019, Vol. 18, N 5, P. 543–563. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2019.1647100</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Østbø J. Securitizing “spiritual-moral values” in Russia. Post-soviet affairs. 2017, Vol. 13, N 3, P. 200–216. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2016.1251023</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Østbø J. Securitizing “spiritual-moral values” in Russia. Post-soviet affairs. 2017, Vol. 13, N 3, P. 200–216. doi: 10.1080/1060586X.2016.1251023</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pecherskaia N. Prospects for Russian family policy: enforcing tradition. The Journal of sociology and social anthropology. 2013, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 94–105. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pecherskaia N. Prospects for Russian family policy: enforcing tradition. The Journal of sociology and social anthropology. 2013, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 94–105. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N. Securitisation theory. In: Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N. (eds). Critical security studies: an introduction. London, New York: Routledge, 2020, 294 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N. Securitisation theory. In: Peoples C., Vaughan-Williams N. (eds). Critical security studies: an introduction. London, New York: Routledge, 2020, 294 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Petro N. N. How the West Lost Russia: explaining the conservative turn in Russian foreign policy. Russian politics. 2018, Vol. 3, N 2, P. 305–332. doi: 10.1163/2451-8921-00303001</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Petro N. N. How the West Lost Russia: explaining the conservative turn in Russian foreign policy. Russian politics. 2018, Vol. 3, N 2, P. 305–332. doi: 10.1163/2451-8921-00303001</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson N. Russian Neo-patrimonialism and Putin’s ‘Cultural Turn’. Europe-Asia studies. 2017, Vol. 69, N 2, P. 348–366. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1265916</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson N. Russian Neo-patrimonialism and Putin’s ‘Cultural Turn’. Europe-Asia studies. 2017, Vol. 69, N 2, P. 348–366. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2016.1265916</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson P. Russian conservatism. Ithaca, London: Cornell university press, 2019, 300 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson P. Russian conservatism. Ithaca, London: Cornell university press, 2019, 300 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Robinson P. Russia’s emergence as an international conservative power. Russia in global affairs. 2020, Vol. 18, N 1, P. 10–37. doi: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-10-37</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robinson P. Russia’s emergence as an international conservative power. Russia in global affairs. 2020, Vol. 18, N 1, P. 10–37. doi: 10.31278/1810-6374-2020-18-1-10-37</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rousselet K. Dukhovnost’ in Russia’s politics. Religion, state and society. 2020, Vol. 48, N 1, P. 38–55. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2019.1705086</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rousselet K. Dukhovnost’ in Russia’s politics. Religion, state and society. 2020, Vol. 48, N 1, P. 38–55. doi: 10.1080/09637494.2019.1705086</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sharafutdinova G. The Pussy Riot affair and Putin's démarche from sovereign democracy to sovereign morality. Nationalities papers. 2014, Vol. 42, N 4, P. 615–621. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2014.917075</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sharafutdinova G. The Pussy Riot affair and Putin's démarche from sovereign democracy to sovereign morality. Nationalities papers. 2014, Vol. 42, N 4, P. 615–621. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2014.917075</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stepanova E. Competing moral discourses in Russia: soviet legacy and post-soviet controversies. Politics, religion &amp; Ideology. 2019, Vol. 20, N 3, P. 340–360. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2019.1656070</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stepanova E. Competing moral discourses in Russia: soviet legacy and post-soviet controversies. Politics, religion &amp; Ideology. 2019, Vol. 20, N 3, P. 340–360. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2019.1656070</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stepanova E.‘The spiritual and moral foundation of civilization in every nation for thousands of years’: the traditional values discourse in Russia. Politics, religion &amp; Ideology. 2015, Vol. 16, N 2–3, P. 119–136. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2015.1068167</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stepanova E.‘The spiritual and moral foundation of civilization in every nation for thousands of years’: the traditional values discourse in Russia. Politics, religion &amp; Ideology. 2015, Vol. 16, N 2–3, P. 119–136. doi: 10.1080/21567689.2015.1068167</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stępka M. The Copenhagen school and beyond. A closer look at securitisation theory. In: Identifying security logics in the EU policy discourse: the “migration crisis” and the EU. Cham: Springer, 2022, P. 17–31.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stępka M. The Copenhagen school and beyond. A closer look at securitisation theory. In: Identifying security logics in the EU policy discourse: the “migration crisis” and the EU. Cham: Springer, 2022, P. 17–31.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsygankov A. Crafting the state-civilization Vladimir Putin’s turn to distinct values. Problems of post-communism. 2016, Vol. 63, N 3, P. 146–158. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1113884</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsygankov A. Crafting the state-civilization Vladimir Putin’s turn to distinct values. Problems of post-communism. 2016, Vol. 63, N 3, P. 146–158. doi: 10.1080/10758216.2015.1113884</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yasaveev I. ‘Threat’, ‘protection’, ‘traditional values’ and ‘patriotism’: Russian authorities’ discourse on youth. In: Omelchenko E. (ed.). Youth in Putin's Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, P. 189–207.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yasaveev I. ‘Threat’, ‘protection’, ‘traditional values’ and ‘patriotism’: Russian authorities’ discourse on youth. In: Omelchenko E. (ed.). Youth in Putin's Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021, P. 189–207.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wilkinson C. Putting “traditional values” into practice: the rise and contestation of antihomopropaganda laws in Russia. Journal of human rights. 2014, Vol. 13, N 3, P. 363–379. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2014.919218</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wilkinson C. Putting “traditional values” into practice: the rise and contestation of antihomopropaganda laws in Russia. Journal of human rights. 2014, Vol. 13, N 3, P. 363–379. doi: 10.1080/14754835.2014.919218</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
