<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">politscience</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Политическая наука</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Political science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1998-1775</issn><publisher><publisher-name>ИНИОН РАН</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31249/poln/2023.03.10</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">politscience-968</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ПЕРВАЯ СТЕПЕНЬ</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Соотношение научных и утопических элементов в политическом мышлении Карла Маркса</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Interrelation of Scientific and Utopian Elements in the Political Thinking of Karl Marx</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Иншаков</surname><given-names>И. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Inshakov</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Иншаков Илья Александрович, старший преподаватель Департамента политики и управления,</p><p>Москва</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Inshakov Ilya,</p><p>Moscow</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">iinshakov@hse.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">HSE University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>07</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title>Лингвистические повороты в политических и социальных науках</issue-title><fpage>213</fpage><lpage>229</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Иншаков И.А., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Иншаков И.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Inshakov I.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/968">https://www.politnauka.ru/jour/article/view/968</self-uri><abstract><p>Известно, что Карл Маркс отличал свою теорию и от строгой «науки», и от «утопизма», присущего его предшественникам. Парадоксальным образом именно эти два элемента конституируют мышление самого Маркса, находясь друг с другом в сложном взаимодействии, специфику которого призвана раскрыть данная статья. С этой целью автор дистанцируется от классических политико-философских дебатов об отношениях Маркса и критикуемых им «социалистов-утопистов». Вместо этого предлагается рассмотрение подхода Маркса как «исследовательской программы» (Имре Лакатос), «когнитивной утопии» (Питер Лассман) и «функциональной утопии» (Карл Мангейм). На основе данного анализа кратко прослеживаются характерные особенности в развитии «советского» и «западного» марксизма. В заключение предлагается дальнейшее направление анализа Маркса через изучение третьего – теологического – компонента его мышления.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>It is well known that Karl Marx distinguished his theory from both pure «science» and from the «utopianism» inherent in his predecessors. Paradoxically, these two elements constitute the thinking of Marx himself, being with each other in a complex interaction, the specifics of which this article is intended to reveal. To this end, the author distances himself from the classical political-philosophical debate about the relationship between Marx and the «utopian socialists» criticized by Marx. Instead, it is proposed to consider Marx's approach as a «research program» (Imre Lakatos), a «cognitive utopia» (Peter Lassman) and a «functional utopia» (Karl Mannheim). Basing on this analysis, features in the development of «Soviet» and «Western» Marxism are briefly traced. In conclusion, a further direction of Marx's analysis is proposed through the study of the third – theological – component of his thinking.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>утопия</kwd><kwd>идеология</kwd><kwd>Карл Маркс</kwd><kwd>марксизм</kwd><kwd>социология науки</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>Utopia</kwd><kwd>ideology</kwd><kwd>Karl Marx</kwd><kwd>Marxism</kwd><kwd>sociology of science</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Адорно Т. Негативная диалектика. – М.: Научный мир, 2003. – 374 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adorno T. Negative Dialectics. Moscow: Scientific World, 2003. 374 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Андерсон П. Размышления о западном марксизме. – М.: Commom place, 2016. – 350 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Anderson P. Considerations on Western Marxism. Moscow: Commom place, 2016, 350 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Баллаев А.Б. Проблема идеологии в творчестве Карла Маркса // История философии. – 1998. – Вып. 3. – С. 55–75.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ballaev A.B. The problem of ideology in the work of Karl Marx. History of philosophy. 1998, Vol. 3, P. 55–75. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гегель Г.В.Ф. Лекции по философии истории. – СПб.: Наука, 2000. – 480 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balibar E. The Philosophy of Marx. London, New York: Verco, 2007, 139 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Жижек С. Что может сказать нам Ленин о свободе сегодня? // Логос. Портфель. – 2002. – Режим доступа: https://ruthenia.ru/logos/kofr/2002/2002_09.htm (дата посещения: 06.05.2023).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels F. Socialism: utopian and scientific. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961 a, Vol. 19, P. 185–230. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крылов П.В. «Теология освобождения» и взгляды ее представителей на концепцию мировой истории // Религия. Церковь. Общество. – 2012. – Вып. 1. – С. 151–178.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels F. Dialectics of Nature. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961 b, Vol. 20, P. 339–626. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кумар К. Марксизм и утопия // Общественные науки и современность. – 1992. – № 3. – С. 125–135.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels F. To Conrad Schmidt. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1965 a, Vol. 37, P. 369–372. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лакатос И. Фальсификация и методология научно-исследовательских программ. – М.: Медиум, 1995. – 236 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels F. To Joseph Bloch. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1965 b, Vol. 37, P. 393–397. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ленин В.И. Три источника и три составных части марксизма // Ленин В.И. Полное собрание сочинений. Издание пятое. – М.: Издательство политической литературы, 1973. – Т. 23. – С. 40–48.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Engels F. To W. Borgius. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1966, Vol. 39, P. 174–177. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мангейм К. Идеология и утопия // Мангейм К. Диагноз нашего времени. – М.: Юрист, 1994. – С. 7–411.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fischbach F. Marx and Utopia. In: Chrostowska S.D., Ingram J.D. (eds.) Political uses of utopia: new marxist, anarchist, and radical democratic perspectives. New York: Columbia university press, 2017, P. 162–171.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. К критике гегелевской философии права. Введение // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955 a. – Т. 1. – С. 414–429.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Freeden M. Stears M. (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford university press, 2013, 752 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. Тезисы о Фейербахе // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955 b. – Т. 3. – С. 1–4.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Fukuyama F. The End of History? The national interest. 1989, Vol. 16, P. 173–189.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. Письмо В.И. Засулич // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1961 a. – Т. 19. – С. 250–251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gutierrez G. A theology of liberation: History, politics and salvation. New York: Orbis, 1988, 264 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. Капитал. Т. I // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1961 b. – Т. 23. – 907 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hegel G.W.F. Lectures on the philosophy of history. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2000. 480 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. Экономико-философские рукописи 1844 года / К. Маркс, Ф. Энгельс. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1961 c. – Т. 42. – С. 41–174.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Horkheimer M., Adorno T. Dialectic of enlightenment. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Medium, Uwenta, 1997, 312 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Немецкая идеология // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955 a. – Т. 3. – С. 7–544.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krylov P.V. «Liberation theology» and the views of its representatives on the concept of world history. Religion. Church. Society. 2012, Vol. 1, P. 151–178. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Манифест коммунистической партии // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1955 b. – Т. 4. – С. 419–459.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kumar K. Marxism and Utopia. Social sciences and contemporary world. 1992, N 3, P. 125–135. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Поппер К. Открытое общество и его враги. Т. II. – М.: Феникс, Международный фонд «Культурная инициатива», 1992. – 528 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lakatos J. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Moscow: «Medium», 1995, 236 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Родионова М.М., Смирнов Н.М. Корабль Тесея: трансформации понятия насилия в политической и социальной теории // Полития. – 2022. – № 3 (106). – С. 6–27.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lassman P. Political theory as utopia. History of the human science. 2003, Vol. 16, N 1, P. 49–62.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стюарт Дж. Гранд-отель «Бездна». Биография Франкфуртской школы. – М.: Ад Маргинем, 2018. – 448 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lenin V.I. The three sources and three component parts of marxism. In: Lenin V.I. (eds). Works. Fifth edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1973, Vol. 23, P. 40–48. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Узланер Д. Постсекулярный поворот. Как мыслить о религии в XXI веке. – М.: Изд-во Института Гайдара, 2020. – 416 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mannheim K. Ideology and utopia. In: Mannheim K. (ed.). Diagnosis of our time. Moscow: Jurist, 1994, P. 7–411. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Уильямс Р. Базис и надстройка в марксистской теории культуры // Логос. – 2012. – № 1 (85). – С. 136–156.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. Critique of Hegel's philosophy of right. Introduction. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955 a, Vol. 1, P. 414–429. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. Диалектика Просвещения. Философские фрагменты. – М., СПб.: Медиум, Ювента, 1997. – 312 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. Theses on Feuerbach. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955 b, Vol. 3, P. 1–4. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шумпетер Й.А. Капитализм социализм и демократия // Шумпетер Й.А. Теория экономического развития. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. – М.: Эксмо, 2008. – С. 361–824.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. The Replay to Zasulich. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961 a, Vol. 19, P. 250–251. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф. Развитие социализма от утопии к науке // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1961 a. – Т. 19. – C. 185–230.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. Capital. Volume I. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961 b, Vol. 23. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф. Диалектика природы // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1961 b. – Т. 20. – С. 339–626.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1961 c, Vol. 42, P. 41–174. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф. Конраду Шмидту // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1965 a. – Т. 37. – С. 369–372.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K, Engels F. The German Ideology. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955 a, Vol. 3, P. 7–544. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф. Йозефу Блоху // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1965 b. – Т. 37. – С. 393–397.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K, Engels F. Manifesto of the Communist Party. In: Marx K., Engels F. (eds). Works. Second edition. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1955 b, Vol. 4, P. 419–459. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Энгельс Ф.В. Боргиусу // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Сочинения. Издание второе. – М.: Государственное издательство политической литературы, 1966. – Т. 39. – С. 174–177.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCarthy C. Review on «Utopianism and Marxism» by Vincent Geoghegan. Utopian studies. 2012, Vol. 23, N 2, P. 543–546.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oizerman T. Marxism and utopianism. Russian studies in philosophy. 2001, Vol. 39, N 4, P. 54–79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oizerman T. Marxism and utopianism. Russian studies in philosophy. 2001, Vol. 39, N 4, P. 54–79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Olssen M. Foucault and marxism: rewriting the theory of historical materialism. Policy futures in education. 2004, Vol. 2, N 3–4, P. 454–482.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Olssen M. Foucault and marxism: rewriting the theory of historical materialism. Policy futures in education. 2004, Vol. 2, N 3–4, P. 454–482.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Popper K. The Open society and its enemies. Vol. 2. Moscow: Phoenix, International Fund «Kul'turnaia initsiativa», 1992, 528 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Popper K. The Open society and its enemies. Vol. 2. Moscow: Phoenix, International Fund «Kul'turnaia initsiativa», 1992, 528 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rodionova M.M., Smirnov N.M. The Ship of Theseus: Transformations of the Concept of Violence in Political and Social Theory. Politeia. 2022, № 3 (106), P. 6–27. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rodionova M.M., Smirnov N.M. The Ship of Theseus: Transformations of the Concept of Violence in Political and Social Theory. Politeia. 2022, № 3 (106), P. 6–27. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Schumpeter J. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. In: Schumpeter J. (ed.). The theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Eksmo, 2008, P. 361–824. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Schumpeter J. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. In: Schumpeter J. (ed.). The theory of economic development. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Moscow: Eksmo, 2008, P. 361–824. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Stuart J. Grand hotel abyss. The lives of the Frankfurt school. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2018, 448 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stuart J. Grand hotel abyss. The lives of the Frankfurt school. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 2018, 448 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Traverso E. Left-Wing Melancholia. New York: Columbia university press, 2016, 320 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Traverso E. Left-Wing Melancholia. New York: Columbia university press, 2016, 320 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Uzlaner D. Post-secular Turn. How to Think about Religion in the 21 st Century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press, 2020, 416 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Uzlaner D. Post-secular Turn. How to Think about Religion in the 21 st Century. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press, 2020, 416 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Williams R. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. Logos. 2021, N 1 (85), P. 136–156. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Williams R. Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. Logos. 2021, N 1 (85), P. 136–156. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Žižek S. Can lenin tell us about freedom today? Logos. Archive, 2002. Mode of access: https://ruthenia.ru/logos/kofr/2002/2002_09.htm (accessed: 06.05.2023). (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Žižek S. Can lenin tell us about freedom today? Logos. Archive, 2002. Mode of access: https://ruthenia.ru/logos/kofr/2002/2002_09.htm (accessed: 06.05.2023). (In Russ.)</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
