Studies of political communications: new challenges. Introducing the issue

1. Ariel Y., Elishar V. Political communication and the hype cycle: tracing its evolution across the digital era. Journalism and media. 2025, Vol. 6, N 2, P. 1–17. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020087

2. Barrett D. Political polarization and social media. Philosophical topics. 2022, Vol. 50, N 2, P. 85–104.

3. Battista D. Political communication in the age of artificial intelligence: an overview of deepfakes and their implications. Society register. 2024, Vol. 8, N 2, P. 7–24. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.14746/sr.2024.8.2.01

4. Bennett L., Manheim J.B. The one-step flow of communication. The annals of the American academy of political and social science. 2006, Vol. 608, N 1, P. 213– 232. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/0002716206292266

5. Blumler J.G. The fourth age of political communication. Politiques de communication. 2016, Vol. 1, N 6, P. 19–30. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.3917/pdc.006.0019

6. Blumler J.G., Cavanagh D. The third age of political communication: influences and features. Political communications. 1999, Vol. 16, N 3, P. 209–230. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1080/105846099198596

7. Bruns A. From “the” public sphere to a network of publics: towards an empirically founded model of contemporary public communication spaces. Communication theory. 2023, Vol. 33, N 2–3, P. 70–81. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad007

8. Bykov I.A., Kurushkin S.V. Digital political communication in Russia: values of humanism vs. technocratic approach. RUDN Journal of political science. 2022, Vol. 24, N 3, P. 419–432. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-419-432 (In Russ.)

9. Choi S. The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums. Social science computer review. 2015, Vol. 33, N 6, P. 696–711. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/0894439314556599

10. Cinelli M., De Francisci Morales G., Galeazzi A., Starnini M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America. 2021, Vol. 118, N 9, Article e2023301118. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202330111

11. De-Lima-Santos M.-F., Gonçalves I., Quiles M. G., Mesquita L., Ceron W. Couto Lorena M.C. Visual political communication on Instagram: a comparative study of Brazilian presidential elections. EPJ data science. 2024, Vol. 13, Article 72. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00502-0

12. Dubois E., Blank G. The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, communication and society. 2018, Vol. 21, N 5, P. 729–745. DOI: http://www.doi.org/0.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656

13. Graber D.A., Smith J.M. Political communication faces the 21st century. Journal of communication. 2005, Vol. 55, N 3, P. 479–507.

14. Jungherr A., Schroeder R. Artificial intelligence and the public arena. Communication theory. 2023, Vol. 33, N 2–3, P. 164–173. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtad006

15. Habermas J. The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: The MIT press, 1991, 301 p.

16. Habermas J. Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical Research. Communication Political science (RU), 2026, N 2 19 theory. 2006, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 411–426. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x

17. Habermas J. A new structural transformation of the public sphere and deliberative politics. Cambridge: Polity press, 2023, 128 p.

18. Han J. Commenters and lurkers: Navigating the two-step flow of communication in online news discourse. New media & society. 2025, P. 1–23. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/14614448251363954

19. Harff D., Stehr P., Schmuck D. Revisiting opinion leadership in the digital realm: Social media influencers as proximal mass opinion leaders. New media & society. 2025, P. 1–19. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/1461444825133

20. Hilbert M., Vasquez J., Halpern D., Valenzuela S., Arriagada E. One step, two step, network step? Complementary perspectives on communication flows in Twittered citizen protests. Social science computer review. 2017, Vol. 35, N 4, P. 444–461. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/0894439316639561

21. Katz E., Lazarsfeld P.F. Personal influence: the part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New York: Free press, 1955, 400 p.

22. Kim S. Understanding political communication and political communicators on Twitch. PLoS ONE. 2024, N 19 (11), Article e0314429. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314429

23. Kruse L.M., Norris D.R., Flinchum J.R. Social media as a public sphere? Politics on social media. The sociological quarterly. 2018, Vol. 59, N 1, P. 62–84. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1080/00380253.2017.1383143

24. Liu J. et al. Conceptualizing echo chambers and information cocoons: a literature review and synthesis of current knowledge and future directions. The Journal of strategic information systems. 2025, Vol. 34, Iss. 2, P. 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101904

25. Luke S., Bon E., Dommett K., Gibson R., Lecheler S., Kruikemeier S. Editorial: datadriven campaigning in a comparative context – toward a 4th Era of political communication? Media and communication. 2024, Vol. 12, Article 9227. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.17645/mac.9227

26. Mattoni A., Ceccobelli D. Comparing hybrid media systems in the digital age: A theoretical framework for analysis. European journal of communication. 2018, Vol. 33, N 5, P. 540–557. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/0267323118784

27. Muronets V.S. The basics yet ahead: an overview of the approaches to investigating political bias in large language models. Political science (RU). 2025, N 2, P. 204– 226. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.02.09

28. Novelli E., Ruggiero C., Solaroli M. Visual political communication of competing leadership: Italy’s 2024 European election campaign on social media. Media and communication. 2025, Vol. 13, Article 10751. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.17645/mac.10751

29. Pfetsch B. Conditions of campaigning in dissonant public spheres and crisis of democracy. Political communication. 2023, Vol. 40, N 3, P. 346–350. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2193554

30. Popova O.V. Communication peculiarities of politized communities in Russianlanguage Telegram channels. Political Expertize: POLITEX. 2023, Vol. 19, N 2, P. 215–229. DOI: http://www.doi.org/0.21638/spbu23.2023.205 (In Russ.)

31. Sorensen L. Populist disruption and the fourth age of political communication. European journal of communication. 2024, Vol. 39, N 1, P. 71–85. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/02673231231184702

32. Stieglitz S., Dang-Xuan L. Emotions and information diffusion in social media –sentiment of microblogs and sharing behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2013. Vol. 29, N 4, P. 217-247. http://www.doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408

33. Strömbäck J. Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. Press / Politics. 2008. Vol. 13, N 3, P. 228–246. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097

34. Terren L., Borge R. Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature. Review of communication research. 2021, Vol. 9, P. 99–118. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028

35. Van Bavel J.J., Rathje S., Harris E., Robertson C., Sternisko A. How social media shapes polarization. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2021, Vol. 25, N 11. P. 913–916.