How to accomplish stability in divided societies
Abstract
The article examines the main areas of contemporary research in the field of institutional organization of divided societies. It highlights the directions of discussion on the topic and indicates the problems embedded in a number of theoretical and empirical models, as well as explains the key terms. It is stated that at present different scientific concepts such as power sharing, integrative power sharing, power dividing etc. acquire new dimensions.
About the Author
Irina Kudryashova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations; Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences, Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Вавилина Е.А. Модель power-sharing как инструмент урегулирования этнополитических конфликтов // Вестник Пермского университета. Серия: «Политология». - Пермь, 2015. - № 1 (29). - С. 94-110.
2. Горовиц Д.Л. Разрушенные основания права сецессии // Власть. - М., 2013. - № 11. - С. 189-191.
3. Декларация о принципах международного права, касающихся дружественных отношений и сотрудничества между государствами в соответствии с Уставом ООН, принятая 24 октября 1970 года Резолюцией 2625 (XXV) на 25-ой сессии Генеральной Ассамблеи ООН. - Режим доступа: http://www.un.org/ru/ documents/ decl_conv/declarations/intlaw_principles.shtml (Дата посещения: 20.11.2015.)
4. Ильченко М.С. Федеративные механизмы в разрешении этнических конфликтов: Переговорный процесс за рамками формальных правил // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2011. - № 1. - С. 170-190.
5. Кудряшова И.В., Мелешкина Е.Ю. Этнические меньшинства и национальное строительство на постсоветском пространстве: к постановке исследовательской проблемы // Вестник МГИМО-Университета. - М., 2009. - № 2(5). - С. 45-55.
6. Кудряшова И.В. Можно ли легитимировать сецессии, или О государственной состоятельности новых политий // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2011. - № 2. - С. 75-104.
7. Лейпхарт А. Демократия в многосоставных обществах: сравнительное исследование. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 1997. - 287 с.
8. Панов П.В. Институциональная устойчивость фрагментированных политий // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2012. - № 3. - С. 31-49.
9. Харитонова О.Г. СФРЮ: Институциональные проблемы этнической федерации // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2012. - № 3. - С. 190-204.
10. Archick K. Northern Ireland: The peace process / Congressional research service. 2015. - March 11. - 23 p. - Mode of access: http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS21333.pdf (Дата посещения: 18.11.2015.)
11. Bird K. Ethnic quotas and ethnic representation worldwide // International political science review. - Beverly Hills, Calif., 2014. - Vol. 35, N 1. - P. 12-26.
12. Buchanan A. Secession: The morality of political divorce from Fort Sumter to Lithuania and Quebec. - Boulder, CO: Westview press, 1991. - 174 p.
13. Buchanan A. Justice, legitimacy and self-determination: Moral foundations for international law. - N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 2004. - 520 p.
14. Buchheit L.C. Secession: The legitimacy of self-determination. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1978. - 260 p.
15. Territorial autonomy in the shadow of conflict: Too little, too late? / Cederman L.-E., Hug S., Shädel A., Wucherpfennig J. // American political science review. - Washington, D.C., 2015. - Vol. 109, N 2. - P. 354-370.
16. Day J. The remedial right of secession in international law // Potentia. - Ottawa, 2012. - Fall / Automne, Iss. 4. - P. 19-34.
17. Guelke A. Politics in deeply divided societies. - Cambridge, Maiden: Polity press, 2012. - 240 p.
18. Hartzell C., Hoddie M. The art of the possible: Power sharing and post-civil war democracy // World politics. - Baltimore, MD, 2015. - Vol. 67, Iss. 01. - P. 37-71.
19. Horowitz D.L. Ethnic groups in conflict. - Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California press, 1985. - 697 p.
20. Horowitz D.L. A democratic South Africa? Constitutional engineering in a divided society. - Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California press, 1991. - 293 р.
21. Horowitz D.L. Ethnic power sharing: Three big problems // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, MD, 2014. - Vol. 25, N 2. - P. 5-20.
22. Lake D.A., Rothchild D. Territorial decentralization and civil war settlements // Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars / Ed. by Roeder Ph.G., Rothchild D. - Ithaca: Cornell univ. press, 2005. - P. 109-132.
23. Lerner H. Making constitutions in deeply divided society. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2011. - 272 p.
24. Lijphart A. The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. - Berkeley: Univ. of California press, 1968. - 222 p.
25. Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy. - New Haven, CT: Yale univ. press, 1999. - 351 p.
26. Lijphart A. Thinking about democracy: Power sharing and majority rule in theory and practice. - N.Y.: Routledge, 2007. - 305 р.
27. Deliberating across deep divides / Luskin R.C., O'Flynn I., Fishkin J.S., Russell D. // Political studies. - Guildford, 2014. - Vol. 62, Iss. 1. - P. 116-135.
28. Lustick I. Stability in deeply divided societies: Consociationalism versus control // World politics. - Baltimore, MD, 1979. - Vol. 31, Iss. 03. - P. 325-344.
29. Lustick I., Miodownik D., Eidelson R.J. Secessionism in multicultural states: Does sharing power prevent or encourage it? // American political science review. -Washington, D.C., 2004. - Vol. 98, N 2. - P. 209-229.
30. McGarry J., O’Leary B. Introduction: Consociational theory and Northern Ireland // The Northern Ireland conflict: Consociational engagements. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2004. - P. 1-60.
31. McGarry J., O’Leary B. Iraq constitution of 2005: Liberal consociation as political prescription // International journal of constitutional law. - Oxford, 2007. - Vol. 5, N 4. - P. 670-698.
32. Norris P. Driving democracy: Do power-sharing institutions work? - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2008. - 320 p.
33. O’Flinn I. Divided societies and deliberative democracy // British journal of political science. - L., 2007. - Vol. 37, Iss. 04. - P. 731-751.
34. O’Flinn I. Democratic theory and practice in deeply divided societies // Representation. - L., 2010. - Vol. 46, Iss. 3. - P. 281-293.
35. Reilly B. Does the choice of electoral system promote democracy? The gap between theory and practice // Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars / Ed. by Roeder Ph.G., Rothchild D. - Ithaca: Cornell univ. press, 2005. - P. 159-171.
36. Roeder Ph.G. Power dividing as an alternative to ethnic powersharing // Sustainable peace: Power and democracy after civil wars / Ed. by Roeder Ph.G., Rothchild D. - Ithaca: Cornel univ. press, 2005. - P. 51-82.
37. Roeder Ph.G. Power dividing. - 2010. - 27 p. - Mode of access: http://www. ethnopolitics.org/isa/Roeder.pdf (Дата посещения: 27.11.2015.)
38. Selway J., Templeman Kh. The myth of consociationalism? Conflict reduction in divided societies // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2012. - N 45 (12). - P. 1542-1571.
39. Sisk T.D. Power sharing and international mediation in ethnic conflicts. - Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of peace, 2002. - 143 p.
40. Smith A. National identity. - L.: Penguin, 1991. - 227 p.
41. Wimmer A., Cederman L.-E., Min B. Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global dataset // American sociological review. - Menasha, Wis., 2009. - Vol. 74 (April). - P. 316-337.
42. Wolff S., Weller M. Self-determination and autonomy: A conceptual introduction // Autonomy, self-governance, and conflict resolution: Innovative approaches to institutional design in divided societies / Ed. by Wolff S., Weller M. - N.Y.: Routledge, 2006. - P. 1-25.
43. Wolff S. Consociationalism, power sharing, and politics at the center. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://www.stefanwolff.com/files/Consociationalism,%20Power%20Sharing,%20 and%20Politics%20at%20the%20Center.pdf (Дата посещения: 12.11.2015.)
Review
Views:
117
Email this article 
Post a Comment 