Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Crises and «crisis»: How to treat cognitive conflicts of political science?

Abstract

The article reveals the sources and factors of evolution of scientific knowledge about politics that generate internal contradictions and crises in the process of updating the knowledge about the world of politics. Of particular importance the author gives the analysis of the contradictions inherent in the political reflection, the conflicts in the ontological, cognitive and axiological bases of political images and the pluralism of conceptual and theoretical approaches. In this context, describes some of the key features of political epistemology in modern terms, marked terms of paradigm transformations and the current update of knowledge about politics. Define the areas of research, allowing to overcome the crisis situation in the evolution of political science, taking into account national peculiarities of the increment of knowledge.

About the Author

Alexander Solovyov
M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation


References

1. Алексеева Т.А. Политические науки на фоне меняющихся картин мира // Политическая рефлексия, теория и методология научных исследований: Ежегодник РАПН 2017 / Под ред. А.И. Соловьева. - М.: РОССПЭН, 2017. - С. 48-64.

2. Белоус В.Г. Самопознание политики (о контурах теории политической рефлексии) // Политическая рефлексия, теория и методология научных исследований. Ежегодник РАПН 2017 / Под ред. А.И. Соловьева. - М.: РОССПЭН, 2017. - С. 8-21.

3. Крадин Н. Политическая антропология: Учеб. пособие. - М.: Ладомир, 2001. - 213 с.

4. Олескин А. Биополитика. - М.: Изд-во Моск. ун-та, 2001. - 459 с.

5. Массовая политика: Институциональные основания / Под ред. С.В. Патрушева. - М.: Политическая энциклопедия, 2016. - 286 с.

6. Рансьер Ж. На краю политического / Пер. с фр. - М.: Праксис, 2006. - 240 с.

7. Сулакшин С.С., Багдасарян В.Э. Высшие ценности Российского государства. - М.: Научный эксперт, 2012. - 624 с.

8. Шабров О.Ф. Понятие политического: возможна ли политическая наука // Власть. - М., 2016. - Т. 24, № 9. - С. 51-61.

9. Adjusting to policy expectations in climate change modeling: An interdisciplinary study of flux adjustments in coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation models / S. Shackley, J. Risbey, P. Stone, B. Wynne // Climatic change. - Dordrecht-Holland; Boston, 1999. - Vol. 43. - P. 453-454.

10. Caldwell L.K. Biopolitics: science, ethic and public policy // Yale review. - Oxford, 1964. - Vol. 54, N 1. - P. 1-16.

11. Carrier M., Nordmann A. Science in the context of application: Methodological change, conceptual transformation, cultural re-orientation // Science in the Context of Application / Ed. by M. Carrier, A. Nordmann; Boston studies in the philosophy of science. - Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. - P. 1-7.

12. Evans R. Economic models and economic policy: What economic forecasters can do for government // Empirical models and policy-making: Interaction and Institutions / Ed. by F. den Butter, M.S. Morgan. - L.: Routledge, 2000. - P. 206-228.

13. Joas H. The creativity of action. - L.: Polity Press, 1996. - 336 p.

14. Knorr-Cetina K. Culture in global knowledge societies: Knowledge cultures and epistemic // Interdisciplinary science reviews. - L., 2007. - Vol. 32. - P. 361-375.

15. Knuuttila T. Modeling and representing: An artefactual approach // Studies in history and philosophy of science. - Oxford, 2011. - Vol. 42. - P. 62-271.

16. Mann M. The sources of social power. - Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. press, 1986. - Vol. 1: A history of power from the beginning to AD 1760. - xxvii, 549 p.

17. Smith Ch.W. Coping with contingencies in equity option markets: The rationality of pricing // The worth of goods: Valuation and pricing in the economy / Ed. by J. Beckert, P. Aspers. - Oxford; N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 2011. - P. 272-294.


Review

Views: 105


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)