The political field and institutional logics
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to develop theoretical and methodological tools for institutional research of political sphere. Two complementary institutional approaches are considered: the theory of organizational fields that allows to form the object of institutional research, namely, the area in which the institutional order arises, as well as the theory of institutional logic that allows to analyze the content of institutional order and to trace the interrelation between the material and symbolic elements of institutions. The author analyzes key problems and potential solutions in connection with the application of approaches and suggests principles for their application to the study of the field of political interactions.
About the Author
L. G. Panov
Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Вебер М. Протестантская этика и дух капитализма // Вебер М. Избранные произведения / Сост., общ. ред. и послесл. Ю.Н. Давыдова; предисл. П.П. Гайденко. - М.: Прогресс, 1990. - С. 61-272.
2. Димаджио П., Пауэлл У. Новый взгляд на «железную клетку»: Институциональный изоморфизм и коллективная рациональность в организационных полях // Классика новой экономической социологии / Сост. В.В. Радаев, Г.Б. Юдин. - М.: Изд. дом Высшей школы экономики, 2014. - С. 164-191.
3. Флигстин Н. Поля, власть и социальные навыки: Критический анализ новых институциональных течений // Экономическая социология. - М., 2001. - Т. 2, № 4. - С. 28-55.
4. Шмерлина И.А. «Институциональная логика»: Критический анализ направления // Социологический журнал. - М., 2016. - Т. 22, №. 4. - С. 110-138.
5. Armstrong E.A. Crisis, collective creativity, and the generation of new organizational forms: The transformation of lesbian/gay organizations in San Francisco // Social structure and organizations revisited / M. Lounsbury, M.J. Ventresca (eds). - L.: Emerald group publishing limited, 2002. - P. 361-395. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Vol. 19.)
6. Martin J.L. What is field theory? // American journal of sociology. - Chicago, 2003. - Vol. 109, N 1. - P. 1-49.
7. Friedland R. God, love, and other good reasons for practice: Thinking through institutional logics // Institutional logics in action, part A / M. Lounsbury, E. Boxenbaum (eds). - L.: Emerald group publishing limited, 2013. - P. 25-50. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations: Vol. 39, Part A.)
8. Friedland R., Alford R. Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions // The new institutionalism in organizational analysis / W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio (eds). - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago press, 2012. - P. 232-266.
9. Haveman H.A., Gualtieri G. Institutional logics. - 2017. - Mode of access: http://business.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.001.0001/acrefore-9780190224851-e-137 (Дата посещения: 11.12.2017.)
10. Mohr J.W., Duquenne V. The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888-1917 // Theory and Society. - Dordrecht, 1997. - Vol. 26, N 2-3. - P. 305-356.
11. Munir K.A., Phillips N. The birth of the «Kodak Moment»: Institutional entrepreneurship and the adoption of new technologies // Organization studies. - 2005. - Vol. 26, N 11. - P. 1665-1687.
12. Powell W. Expanding the scope of institutional analysis // The new institutionalism in organizational analysis / W.W. Powell, P.J. DiMaggio (eds). - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago press, 2012. - P. 183-203.
13. Reay T., Hinings C.R. The recomposition of an organizational field: Health care in Alberta // Organization studies. - L.; Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2005. - Vol. 26, N 3. - P. 351-384.
14. Scott W.R. Organizations and institutions // Foundations for Organizational Science. - L.; Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 1995. - 200 p.
15. Scott W.R. Institutions and organizations: Ideas and Interests. - 3 rd ed. - Los Angeles: Sage publications, 2008. - 280 p.
16. Thornton P.H., Ocasio W. Institutional logics // The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. - L.; Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2008. - P. 99-128.
17. Tolbert P.S., Zucker L.G. Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organizations: The diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935 // Administrative science quarterly. - Ithaca; N.Y., 1983. - P. 22-39.
18. Voronov M., De Clercq D., Hinings C.R. Institutional complexity and logic engagement: An investigation of Ontario fine wine // Human Relations. - L., 2013. - Vol. 66, N 12. - P. 1563-1596.
19. Weber K., Patel H., Heinze K.L. From cultural repertoires to institutional logics:
20. A content-analytic method // Institutional Logics in Action, Part B / M. Lounsbury, E. Boxenbaum (eds). - L.: Emerald group publishing limited, 2013. - P. 351-382. (Research in the Sociology of Organizations; vol. 39, part B.)
21. Wooten M., Hoffman A.J. Organizational fields: Past, present and future // The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. - L.; Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, 2008. - P. 130-147.
Review
Views:
69
Email this article 
Post a Comment 