The validity of soft power indices: from challenges to solutions
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.02.12
Abstract
The potential of a state in developing its “soft power” is an important component in assessing its state capacity. A nation’s “soft power” not only refers to its external attractiveness and informal influence on decisions made by other international actors, but also serves as an important indicator of a country's potential to affect the formation of a more favorable external environment. The validity of “soft power” indices has not so far been thoroughly studied. This gap poses a significant limitation to practical applications of these indices in comparative empirical research. We fill this gap by conducting the validity analysis and showing that existing “soft power” indices present a number of challenges, including an unknown or unjustified choice of data aggregation method, inconsistency in the conceptualization of proxy variables, and the inclusion of survey results of public opinion and expert surveys in the analysis. This study introduces and tests some ways to overcome the identified problems. These include measuring only the resources of “soft power”, relying on a rigorous conceptual framework, refraining from using subjective data, and employing the principal component method for a more methodologically sound selection of the final weights. This work provides an example of how a more valid index could be developed, though the choice of both proxy variables and possible measurements of “soft power” still requires further empirical research.
Keywords
About the Authors
P. A. GrinevichRussian Federation
Grinevich Polina
Moscow
A. P. Bocharova
Russian Federation
Bocharova Alexandra
Moscow
D. K. Stukal
Russian Federation
Stukal Denis
Moscow
References
1. Anguelov N., Kaschel T. Toward quantifying soft power: the impact of the proliferation of information technology on governance in the Middle East. Palgrave communications. 2017, Vol. 3, N 1, P. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.16
2. Collier D., Mahon J.E. Conceptual «stretching» revisited: adapting categories in comparative analysis. American political science review. 1993, Vol. 87, N 4, P. 845–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818
3. Fan Y. Soft power: power of attraction or confusion? Place branding and public diplomacy. 2008, Vol. 4, N 2, P. 147–158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/pb.2008.4
4. Gallarotti G. How to measure soft power in international relations (Chugrov S., Trans.). Polis. Political studies. 2020, N 1, P. 89–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.01.07 (In Russ.)
5. Hall T. An unclear attraction: a critical examination of soft power as an analytical category. The Chinese journal of international politics. 2010, Vol. 3, N 2, P. 189–211. DOI: https://www.jstor.org/stable/48615744
6. Holsti K.J. The concept of power in the study of international relations. Background. 1964, Vol. 7, N 4, P. 179–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3013644
7. Keating V. C., Kaczmarska K. Conservative soft power: liberal soft power bias and the ‘hidden’attraction of Russia. Journal of international relations and development. 2019, Vol. 22, N 1, P. 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-017-0100-6
8. Kharitonova E. Soft Power Effectiveness: Problem of Evaluation. World economy and international relations. 2015, N 6, P. 48–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-6-48-58 (In Russ.)
9. Knott B., Fyall A., Jones I. Sport mega-events and nation branding: Unique characteristics of the 2010 FIFA World Cup, South Africa. International journal of contemporary hospitality management. 2017, Vol. 29, N 3, P. 900–923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-09-2015-0523
10. Lee J.N. The rise of China and soft power: China's soft power influence in Korea. China review. 2008, Vol. 8, N 1, P. 127–154. DOI: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23462264
11. Li E. The rise and fall of soft power. Foreign policy. 2018. Mode of access: https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/20/the-rise-and-fall-of-soft-power/ (accessed: 18.09.2023).
12. Lukes S. Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millennium. 2005, Vol. 33, N 3, P. 477–493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330031201
13. Lukes S. Power: a radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, 201 p.
14. McClory J. The New Persuaders. London: Institute for Government, 2010, 15 p.
15. Nye J.S. Soft power. Foreign policy. 1990, N 80, P. 153–171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580
16. Nye Jr J.S. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. N.Y.: Public affairs, 2004. – 192 p.
17. Nye J.S. Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American academy of political and social science. 2008, Vol. 616, P. 94–109.
18. Rothman S.B. Revising the soft power concept: what are the means and mechanisms of soft power? Journal of political power. 2011, Vol. 4, N 1, P. 49–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379x.2011.556346
19. Rusakova O.F (ed.). Soft power: theory, resources, discourse. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House “Discourse-Pi”, 2015, 376 p. (In Russ.)
20. Sartori G. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American political science review. 1970, Vol. 64, N 4, P. 1033–1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356
21. Vuving A. How soft power works. SSRN electronic journal. 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1466220
22. Yun S.H., Kim J.N. Soft power: from ethnic attraction to national attraction in sociological globalism. International journal of intercultural relations. 2008, Vol. 32, N 6, P. 565–577. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.09.001