Emergency administration: managerial and legislative decision-making process in 2020–2022
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.01.07
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the study of the legislative process and the analysis of procedures for making administrative decisions in modern Russia in the emergency situations of 2020–2022. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the extraordinary and the regular in law-making process and in administrative practices are studied. The concept of social order as a regular phenomenon, as well as the phenomenon of the extraordinary in political philosophy are considered. The features of legislative regulation in a situation where emergency conditions become a source and reason for change are analyzed; the development of measures from an exclusive to permanent one is traced. Based on a study of the behavior of the governmental bodies of the Russian Federation in conditions of emergency, conclusions are drawn about changes in the model of public administration in the context of global and internal instability: with the acceleration and intensification of the process of considering bills, the actors involved in lawmaking tend to adopt norms that, purposing to ensure the safety of citizens and protect their interests, limit their rights and concentrate power in the hands of government departments.
About the Authors
E. M. Schulmann
Robert Bosch academy
Germany
Germany
Berlin
A. A. Kutuzova
The Russian presidential academy of national economy and public administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Agamben J. «Homo sacer. Sovereign power and bare life». Moscow: Publishing house «Europe», 2011, 256 p. (In Russ.)
2. Foucault M. Security, territory, population. A course of lectures given at the College de France in the 1977–1978 academic year. Saint Petersburg: Nauka, 2011, 544 p. (In Russ.)
3. Hobbes T. Selected works. Volume 2. Moscow: Thought, 1964, 196 p. (In Russ.)
4. Khabrieva T.Y., Chernogor N.N. Law and the pandemic: the lessons of the crisis. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2022, Vol. 92, N 8, P. 531–535
5. Mering R., Kildyushov O. “The state of European jurisprudence” by Carl Schmitt. Russian sociological review. 2018, Vol. 17, N 1, P. 30–58. (In Russ.)
6. Parsons T. The structure of social action: a study in social theory with special reference to a group of recent European writers. New York: Free press, 1964, 817 p.
7. Schmitt K. The concept of the political. Questions of sociology. 1992, N 1, P. 37–67. (In Russ.)
8. Benjamin V. On the concept of history. In: Benjamin V. (ed.). Teaching about similarity. Media aesthetic works. Moscow: RGGU, 2012, P. 237–253. (In Russ.)
Review
Views:
231
Email this article 
Post a Comment 