Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Words and meanings in Türkiye’s foreign policy discourse

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.02.05

Abstract

The article examines the words and meanings that form the basis of Türkiye’s foreign policy discourse, what significance in the international arena is growing year after year. Discourse is an essential part of any state’s politics and, at the same time, a significant indicator of dominant sentiments in society. Given Russia’s shift towards the East and its versatile partnership with Türkiye, studying its foreign policy narratives becomes particularly important in terms of strategic planning and bilateral relations prospects. The authors consider the “open” and “closed” discourses of official Ankara and identify the main verbal messages, or “total myths”, that the power elite embeds in the country’s foreign policy. A content analysis of Turkish President R.T. Erdoğan’s public speeches for 2024 is attempted to analyze the frequency and context of key words and foreign policy narratives such as: “leader”, “justice”, “hub” and “World is bigger than five”. The article reveals that the keyword that stands out in 2024 was “justice” that became the dominant narrative in most of Erdoğan’s speeches. The correlation between declared words and narratives and their corresponding semantic load has been also studied. The author concludes that almost all narratives are endowed with several meanings, and the narrative of “justice” is a collective one. However, Türkiye’s interpretation of some words and concepts may significantly differ from generally accepted norms or those of other societies. Therefore, it seems that not all of these narratives can compete with the discursive elements of the external environment.

About the Authors

V. A. Avatkov
INION
Russian Federation

Avatkov Vladimir

Moscow



A. I. Sbitneva
INION
Russian Federation

Sbitneva Alina

Moscow



References

1. Akhmedov V.M. Features of Egypt's political culture. Russia and the Moslem world. 2007, N 8, P. 125–137. (In Russ.)

2. Avatkov V.A. Neo-Ottomanism. The basic ideology and geostrategy of Turkey. Svobodnaia mysl'. 2014, N 3, P. 71–78. (In Russ.)

3. Bakharev A.A. The presidentialization of Turkey during the administration of R.T. Erdogan: opportunities and limitations. Political science (RU). 2024, N 3, Р. 134–160. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.03.06 (In Russ.)

4. Batalov E.J. Anthropology of international relations. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2018, 352 p. (In Russ.)

5. Doğanay Y. Türkiye’nin enerji politikası ve altyapısı bağlamında enerji hub potansiyeli. Ulusam Türkiye politik Çalışmalar dergisi. 2021, Vol. 1, N 1, P. 33–48. (In Turkish)

6. Kissinger H.A. Leadership: six studies in world strategy. London: Penguin Books, 2022, 499 p.

7. Lasswell G.D. The language of power. Political linguistics. 2006, N 1, P. 264–280. (In Russ.)

8. Malinova O.Yu. Identity politics as a struggle for meanings: problems of conceptualization. In: Malinova O.Yu. (ed.). Symbolic politics: collection of scientific papers. Issue 5: Identity politics. Moscow: INION RAN, 2017, P. 7–20. (In Russ.)

9. Malinova O.Yu. Politics as a branch of symbolic politics. Metod. 2019, N 9, P. 285–312. (In Russ.)

10. Şahin K. Cumhuriyetimizin 100. Yılı (2023) Yaklaşırken “Lider Ülke Türkiye İdeali”: Siyasi bir Analiz. Düşünce Dünyasında Türkiz. 2014, Vol. 5, N 25, P. 121–142. (In Turkish)

11. Selezneva A.V. The value-worldview foundations of politics: conceptual understanding and prospects for empirical study. Introducing the Issue. RUDN journal of political science. 2024, Vol. 26, N 2, P. 223–233. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2024-26-2-223-233 (In Russ.)

12. Shakleina T.A. Leadership and the modern world order. International trends. 2015, Vol. 13, N 4, P. 6–19. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.17994/IT.2015.13.4.43.1 (In Russ.)

13. Tokdoğan N. Yeni Osmanlıcılık: Hınç, Nostalji, Narsisizm. Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2018, 286 p. (In Turkish)

14. Tsibenko V.V. Ideologeme of justice and anticolonial discourse as justification for Türkiey’s foreign policy. Journal of international analytics. 2023, Vol. 14, N 2, P. 97–115. (In Russ.)

15. Van Dijk T.A. Discourse and power: representation of dominance in language and communication. Moscow: Knizhnyi dom «LIBROKOM», 2013, 344 p. (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 94


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)