Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Maintaining resilience and adapting multilevel systems to external shocks

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.03.02

Abstract

External shocks affect the quality of governance and the stability of political systems around the world. The concept of resilience, which until recently was actively used only in natural science research, has become a key focus for political scientists studying the impact of crises on political institutions in various national contexts. In studies of the causes of resilience to external shocks, a significant place is occupied by studies of multi-level governance, where multi-levelness is considered as a key factor determining the success or failure of a state's adaptation to new conditions.
Adaptation of multi-level political systems to external shocks has been profoundly examined using the example of the natural disasters effects and the COVID-19 pandemic, where the impact of these events on the decision-making process most fully corresponds to the concept of an “external shock” and requires the fastest possible responses. At the same time, the found explanations for the speed and quality of the response of multi-level systems to natural disasters or pandemics are not always suitable for explaining the adaptation of states to such external shocks as large-scale economic sanctions, since the latter do not imply such rapid and obvious negative consequences. In addition, the consequences of economic sanctions are not always interpreted by stakeholders as an “external shock”, but can often be framed as a routine policy. In this article, we attempt to generalize the existing theoretical explanations in the social sciences of the quality of adaptation of multi-level political systems to external shocks and assess their analytical capabilities for studying the adaptation of the Russian multi-level system to the consequences of economic sanctions in housing policy. The possibilities and limitations of using existing theories will be illustrated by the case of adaptation of the housing policy sphere in Russian regions to new economic conditions.

About the Authors

A. B. Sorbale
HSE University
Russian Federation

Sorbale Aleksei Borisovich
Saint Petersburg



D. A. Stremoukhov
HSE University
Russian Federation

Stremoukhov Denis Aleksandrovich
Saint Petersburg



I. K. Shevtsova
HSE University
Russian Federation

Shevtsova Irina Konstantinovna
Saint Petersburg



References

1. Aldrich D. P., Meyer M. A. Social capital and community resilience. American behavioral scientist. 2015, Vol. 59, N 2, P. 254–269.

2. Alessi L., Benczur P., Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Manca A. R., Menyhert B., Pagano A. The resilience of EU member states to the financial and economic crisis. Social indicators research. 2020, Vol. 148, P. 569–598.

3. Allain-Dupré D. Multi-level governance of Public Investment: Lessons from the Crisis. OECD Regional development working papers. 2011, N 2011/05, P. 1–67.

4. Ansah I.G.K., Gardebroek C., Ihle R. Shock interactions, coping strategy choices and household food security. Climate and development. 2021, N 5, P. 414–426.

5. Babeykin R.V. Assessing the efficiency of regional practices of governance centralization in the field of urban planning in Russia. Gosudarstvennoye upravleniye. Elektronnyy vestnik. 2024, N 106, P. 183–199. (In Russ.)

6. Balakina Y.V., Sosnin A.V., Tumanova M.V. Strategies of legitimation and maintaining the image in the discourse of Russian governors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perm University Herald. Political Science. 2022, Vol. 16, N 4, P. 5–16. (In Russ.)

7. Béland D., Howlett M., Rocco P., Waddan A. Designing policy resilience: lessons from the affordable care act. Policy Sciences. 2020, Vol. 53, P. 269–289.

8. Boguchwal L., Johnson M., Keweley L., Evans D. Learning networks: Iran and the effects of sanctions. Defense technical information center. 2012, N 2, P. 501–532.

9. Brand F.S., Jax K. Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and society. 2007, N 1, P. 87–111.

10. Broadhurst K., Gray N. Understanding resilient places: Multi-level governance in times of crisis. Local economy. 2022, Vol. 37, N 1–2, P. 84–103.

11. Burke S., Parker S., Fleming P., Barry S., Thomas S. Building health system resilience through policy development in response to COVID-19 in Ireland: from shock to reform. The Lancet regional health–Europe. 2021, Vol. 9, P. 265–288.

12. Burns P., Thomas M.O. The failure of the nonregime: How Katrina exposed New Orleans as a regimeless city. Urban affairs review. 2006, N 4, P. 517–527.

13. Busemeyer M.R., Thelen K. Institutional sources of business power. World politics. 2020, N 3, P. 448–480.

14. Castañeda G., Guerrero O.A. The resilience of public policies in economic development. Complexity. 2018, N 1, P. 1–15.

15. Carmen E., Fazey I., Ross H., Bedinger M., Smith F.M., Prager K., McClymont K., Morrison D. Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital. Ambio. 2022, N 6, P. 1371–1387.

16. Carroll B.J., Brummel L., Toshkov D., Yesilkagit K. Multilevel governance and responses to the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review. Regional & Federal studies. 2023, Vol. 32, N 2, P. 1–22.

17. Casula M., Pazos-Vidal S. Assessing the multi-level government response to the COVID-19 crisis: Italy and Spain compared. International journal of public administration. 2021, N 11–12, P. 994–1005.

18. Capano G., Woo J. J. Resilience and robustness in policy design: A critical appraisal. Policy Sciences. 2017, N 3, P. 399–426.

19. Chisadza C., Clance M., Gupta R. Government effectiveness and the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability. 2021, N 6, P. 30–42.

20. Chowdhury A.Z., Jomo K.S. Responding to the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries: lessons from selected countries of the global south. Development (Society for international development). 2020, N 2–4, P. 162–171.

21. Cohen S., Hlepas N. Financial resilience of Greek local governments. governmental financial resilience. Emerald publishing limited. 2017, Vol 27, P. 135–152.

22. Comfort L.K., Oh N., Ertan G. The dynamics of disaster recovery: Resilience and entropy in hurricane response systems 2005–2008. Public organization review. 2009, N 9, P. 309–323.

23. Cutter S.L., Barnes L., Berry M., Burton Ch., Evans E., Tate E., Webb J. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global environmental change. 2008, N 4, P. 598–606.

24. Daneshmandi M., Amiri H., Vahedi M., Farshi M., Saghafi A., Zigheymat F. Assessing the level of preparedness for confronting crisis such as flood, earthquake, fire and storm in some selected hospitals of Iran. Journal of military medicine. 2010, N 1, P. 708–723.

25. Doukas Y.E., Maravegias N., Ioannides S., Salvati L., Vardopoulos I. Economic resilience and sustainability in the European Union: a comparative analysis of pre-and posteconomic crisis. Environmental sustainability and global change. Elsevier. 2025, Vol. 29, P. 257–273.

26. Egle S. The learning curve of sanctions-have three decades of sanctions reform taught us anything. Currents: Int'l trade LJ. 2010, Vol. 19, P. 34–49.

27. Filippini T., Vinceti S. Italian national recovery and resilience plan: a healthcare renaissance after the COVID-19 crisis? Acta bio medica: atenei parmensis. 2021, N 6, P. 444–463.

28. Gan C.C.R., Oktari R.S., Nguyen H.X., Yuan L., Yu.X., Alisha K.C., Tuyet Hanh T.T., Phung D.T., Dwirahmadi F., Liu T., Musumari P.M., Kayano R., Chu A. A scoping review of climate-related disasters in China, Indonesia and Vietnam: disasters, health impacts, vulnerable populations and adaptation measures. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2021, Vol. 66, P. 102–138.

29. George J., Fox L., Fuglie K., Jayne T. Shocks, resilience and structural transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainability. 2021, N 24, P. 136–154.

30. Giannakis E., Bruggeman A. Determinants of regional resilience to economic crisis: A European perspective. European planning studies. 2017, N 8, P. 1394–1415.

31. Haider L.J., Cleaver F. Capacities for resilience: persisting, adapting and transforming through bricolage. Ecosystems and people. 2023, N 1, P. 224–234.

32. Haldane V., De Foo C., Abdalla S.M., Jung A.S., Tan M., Wu S., Legido-Quigley H. Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nature medicine. 2021, N 6, P. 964–980.

33. Hirschhorn F. A multi-level governance response to the Covid-19 crisis in public transport. Transport policy. 2021, Vol. 112, P. 13–21.

34. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual review of ecology and systematics. 1973, N 1, P. 1–23.

35. Holling C.S. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems. 2001, N 4, P. 390–405.

36. Hooghe L., Marks G. Types of multi-level governance. In: Enderlein H., Wälti S., Zürn M. (eds). Handbook on multi-level governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010, P. 17–32.

37. Howlett M. Procedural policy tools and the temporal dimensions of policy design. Resilience, robustness and the sequencing of policy mixes. International review of public policy. 2019, N 1, P. 27–45.

38. Keck M., Sakdapolrak P. What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde. 2013, N 5, P. 5–19.

39. Kuhlmann S., Franzke J. Multi-level responses to COVID-19: crisis coordination in Germany from an intergovernmental perspective. Local government studies. 2022, N 2, P. 312–334.

40. Liu Z., Guo J., Zhong W., Gui T. Multi-level governance, policy coordination and subnational responses to COVID-19: comparing China and the US. Journal of comparative policy analysis: research and practice. 2021, N 2, P. 204–218.

41. Markov R. S. The Coronavirus pandemic as a shaping factor in the political context of Russian gubernatorial election campaigns. Society: politics, economics, law. 2021, N 11, P. 29–35. (In Russ.)

42. Martin-Breen P., Anderies J.M. Resilience: A literature review. Brighton: IDS 2011, 56 p.

43. Miller F. Osbahr, H., Boyd E., Thomalla F., Bharwani S., Ziervogel G., Walker B., Birkmann J., van der Leeuw S., Rockström J., Hinkel J., Downing T., Folke C., Nelson D. Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and society. 2010, N 3, P. 479–491.

44. Mulé R. Coping with the global economic crisis: the regional political economy of emergency social shock absorbers in Italy. Regional & Federal studies. 2016, N 3, P. 359–379.

45. Nieuwborg A., Hiemstra-van Mastrigt S., Melles M., Zekveld J., Santema S. A categorization of resilience: a scoping review. Administrative sciences. 2023, N 4, P. 95–116.

46. Novalia W., Malekpour S. Theorising the role of crisis for transformative adaptation. Environmental science & policy. 2020, N 112, P. 361–370.

47. Pant L.P., Adhikari B., Bhattarai K.K. Adaptive transition for transformations to sustainability in developing countries. Current opinion in environmental sustainability. 2015, Vol. 14, P. 206–212.

48. Parsons M., Glavac S., Hastings P., Marshall G., McGregor J., McNeill J., Stayner R. Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: A conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 2016, Vol. 19, P. 1–11.

49. Peng C., Yuan M., Gu C., Peng Z., Ming T. A review of the theory and practice of regional resilience. Sustainable cities and society. 2017, Vol. 29, P. 86–96.

50. Putnam R.D., Nanetti R.Y., Leonardi R. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994, 280 p.

51. Ramezani J., Camarinha-Matos L.M. Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems. Technological forecasting and social change. 2020, Vol. 151, P. 119–146.

52. Rogov M., Rozenblat C., Bida M., Shutters S. Evaluating multilevel resilience of Russian urban economies 2010–2019. Ecology and society. 2022, N 4, P. 2–22.

53. Sabatier P. A. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy sciences. 1988, N 2, P. 129–168.

54. Sajadi H.S., Majdzadeh R. Health system to response to economic sanctions: global evidence and lesson learned from Iran. Globalization and health. 2022, N 1, P. 107–123.

55. Scharpf F.W. Introduction: the problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European public policy. 1997, N 4, P. 520–538.

56. Stark A. Bureaucratic values and resilience: An exploration of crisis management adaptation. Public administration. 2014, N 3, P. 692–706.

57. Taslimi M.S., Azimi A., Nazari M. Resilience to economic sanctions; case study: hospital equipment cluster of Tehran (HECT). International journal of disaster resilience in the built environment. 2021, N 1, P. 13–28.

58. Torres A.P., Marshall M.I., Sydnor S. Does social capital pay off? The case of small business resilience after Hurricane Katrina. Journal of contingencies and crisis management. 2019, N 2, P. 168–181.

59. Upadhaya B., Wijethilake C., Adhikari P., Jayasinghe K., Arun T. COVID-19 policy responses: reflections on governmental financial resilience in South Asia. Journal of public budgeting, accounting & financial management. 2020, N 5, P. 825–836.

60. Weiss L. Developmental states in transition: adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘normalizing’. The pacific review. 2000, N 1, P. 21–55.

61. Wondreys J., Mudde C. Victims of the pandemic? European far-right parties and COVID-19. Nationalities papers. 2022, N 1, P. 86–103.

62. Wulandhari N.B.I., Gölgeci I., Mishra N., Sivarajah U., Gupta S. Exploring the role of social capital mechanisms in cooperative resilience. Journal of business research. 2022, Vol. 143, P. 375–386.

63. Yaghoubi M., Najarkolaei R. Iranian hospital preparedness dealing with disasters: a review study. Quarterly scientific journal of rescue and relief. 2015, N 4, P. 1–16.

64. Yan B., Zhang X., Wu L., Zhu H., Chen B. Why do countries respond differently to COVID-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. The American review of public administration. 2020, N 6–7, P. 762–769.

65. Zemtsov S. P. Sanctions risks and regional development: Russian case. Baltic region. 2024, N 1, P. 23–45.

66. Zhou X. Organizational response to COVID-19 crisis: Reflections on the Chinese bureaucracy and its resilience. Management and organization review. 2020, N 3, P. 473–484.


Review

Views: 17


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)