Dominant party regime as perspective for political transformation of post-communist states
Abstract
The author realizes analysis of characteristics of dominant party regime in order to advancement new research perspective for political transformation of several post-communist states. Based on study of theoretical approaches and conceptualization dominant party regime’s the author examines mechanisms of political competition under single-party dominance. Erosion of electoral competition that maintained by regime’s resource advantages provide durability of dominant party regimes.
References
1. Гельман В.Я. Политические партии в России: от конкуренции - к иерархии // Полис. - М., 2008. - № 5. - С. 135-152.
2. Голосов Г.В. Электоральный авторитаризм в России // Pro et Contra. - М., 2008. - № 1. - С. 22-35.
3. Грызлов Б.В. Две партии в одной // Русская политическая культура. Взгляд из утопии: Лекция Владислава Суркова. Материалы обсуждения в «Независимой газете» / Ремчуков К.В. (ред.). - М.: Независимая Газета, 2007. - С. 79-86.
4. Дюверже М. Политические партии. - М.: Академический Проект, 2000. - 538 с.
5. Ербосынов К., Изтлеуов С. «Нур Отан» - партия согласия старшего и среднего жузов // ZonaKZ. - Алатау, 2007. - 22 августа. - Режим доступа: http://www.zonakz.net/articles/19032 (Дата посещения: 18.04.2014.)
6. Лейпхарт А. Демократия в многосоставных обществах. - М.: Аспект Пресс, 1997. - 287 с.
7. Липсет С.М., Роккан С. Структуры размежеваний, партийные системы и предпочтения избирателей // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2004. - № 4. - С. 204-234.
8. Мелешкина Е.Ю. Доминирование по-русски или мировой феномен? // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2006. - № 1. - С. 135-161.
9. Пшеворский А. Демократия и рынок: Политические и экономические реформы в Восточной Европе и Латинской Америке. - М.: РОССПЭН, 1999. - 319 с.
10. Arian A., Barnes S.H. The dominant party system: A neglected model of democratic stability // The journal of politics. - N.Y., 1974. - Vol. 36, N 3. - P. 592-614.
11. Collier R.B. The contradictory alliance: State-labor relations and regime change in Mexico. - Berkeley: Univ. of California at Berkeley, 1992. - 187 p.
12. Cox G.V. Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1997. - 340 p.
13. Downs A. An economic theory of democracy. - N.Y.: Harper and Row, 1957. - 310 p.
14. Giliomee H., Simkins C. The dominant party regimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: A comparative assessment // The awkward embrace: One-party domination and democracy / Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.). - Amsterdam: Taylor & Francis, 2005. - P. 1-45.
15. Greene K.F. Why dominant parties lose?: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2007. - 350 p.
16. Horowitz D.L. Democracy in divided societies // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, MD, 1993. - Vol. 4, N 4. - P. 18-38.
17. Huntington S.P. Social and institutional dynamics of one-party systems // Authoritarian politics in modern society: The dynamics of established one-party systems / Huntington S.P., Moore C.H. (eds.). - N.Y.: Basic Books, 1970. - P. 3-47.
18. Kirchheimer O. The transformation of the western European party systems // Political parties and political development / La Polamabara J., Weiner M. (eds.). - Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 1966. - P. 177-200.
19. Magaloni B. Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2006. - 296 p.
20. Matlosa K., Karume S. Ten years of democracy and the dominant party system in South Africa // Election update 2004: South Africa. - Auckland Park, 2004. - Vol. 5. - P. 8-14.
21. Pempel T.J. Introduction. Uncommon democracies: The one-party dominant regimes // Uncommon democracies: The one-party dominant regimes / Pempel T.J. (ed.). - Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell univ. press, 1990. - P. 1-32.
22. Reuter O.J., Remington T.F. Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: The case of united Russia // Comparative political studies. - Beverly Hills, CA, 2009. - Vol. 42, N 4. - P. 501-526.
23. Sartori G. Parties and party systems: A framework for analysis. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1976. - 383 p.
24. Stone W.J., Maisel L.S., Maestas C.D. Quality counts: Extending the strategic politician model of incumbent deterrence // American journal of political science. - Hoboken, NJ, 2004. - Vol. 48, N 3. - P. 479-495.
25. Zaller J. Politicians as prize fighters: Electoral selection and incumbency advantage // Politicians and party politics / Geer J. (ed.). - N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 1998. - P. 125-185.
Review
Views:
85
Email this article 
Post a Comment 