Эффективность государства: Новые подходы
Аннотация
Список литературы
1. Ахременко А.С. Эффективность государственных инвестиций в публичный капитал: От модели к оценке // Полис: Политические исследования. - М., 2014. - № 6. - С. 9-31.
2. Ахременко А.С., Локшин И.М., Юрескул Е.А. Экономический рост и выбор политического курса в авторитарных режимах: «недостающее звено» // Полития: Анализ. Хроника. Прогноз. - М., 2015. - Т. 3, № 78. - С. 50-74.
3. Ахременко А.С., Юрескул Е.А. Эффективность государственного управления: Политологический и экономический подходы // Общественные науки и современность. - М., 2013. - № 1. - С. 77-88.
4. Декларация тысячелетия Организации Объединенных Наций // The United Nations [Сайт]. - Mode of access: http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/millennium_summit. shtml (Дата посещения: 16.08.2016.)
5. Юрескул Е.А. Влияние институциональных характеристик политической системы на эффективность государственной власти // Политическая экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. - М., 2013. - № 3. - С. 228-249.
6. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Why nations fail: The Origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. - N.Y.: Crown Bus, 2012. - 546 p.
7. Adsera A., Boix C., Payne M. Are you being served? Political Accountability and quality of government // The journal of law, economics and organization. - Oxford, 2003. - Vol. 19, N 2. - P. 445-490.
8. Afonso A., Aubyn M. Non-parametric Approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries // Journal of applied economics. - Buenos-Aires, 2005. - Vol. 8 (2). - P. 227-246.
9. Balaguer-Coll M.T., Prior D., Tortosa-Ausina E. Output complexity, environmental conditions, and the efficiency of municipalities // Journal of productivity analysis. - Berlin, 2012. - Vol. 39, N 3. - P. 303-324.
10. Battese G.E., Rao D., O’Donnell C.J. A Metafrontier Production function for estimation of technical efficiencies and technology gaps for firms operating under different technologies // Journal of productivity analysis. - Berlin, 2004. - Vol. 21, N 1. - P. 91-103.
11. Boyne G.A. What is public service improvement? // Public Administration. - Oxford, 2003. - Т. 81, N 2. - С. 211-227.
12. Brewer G.A., Hupe P.L. Working both sides of the street: Bringing together policy and organizational perspectives on public service performance: Working paper Prepared for delivery at the 9 th Public Management Research Conference, Tucson, Arizona (USA), 25-27 October 2007. - 2007. - 27 p.
13. Carter N. Learning to measure performance: The use of indicators in organizations // Public Administration. - Oxford, 1991. - Т. 69, N 1. - С. 85-101.
14. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units // European journal of operational research. - Amsterdam, 1978. - N 2. - P. 429-444.
15. Coelli T. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. - N.Y.: Springer, 2005. - 349 p.
16. Dahlberg S, Holmberg S. Democracy and bureaucracy: How their quality matters for popular satisfaction // West European politics. - L., 2014. - Vol. 37, N 3. - P. 515-537.
17. Diamond L, Plattner M.F. The global divergence of democracies. - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins univ. press, 2001. - 416 p.
18. Diarra G., Plane P. Assessing the World Bank’s Influence on the good governance paradigm // Oxford development studies. - Oxford, 2014. - Т. 42, N 4. - С. 473-487.
19. Fishman R. Rethinking dimensions of democracy for empirical analysis: Authenticity, quality, depth, and consolidation // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, 2016. - Vol. 19. - P. 289-309.
20. Fukuyama F. Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it? // Annual review political science. - Palo Alto, 2016. - Vol. 19, N 6. - P. 1-17.
21. Grindle M.S. Good enough governance revisited // Development policy review. - L., 2007. - Т. 25, N 5. - С. 553-574.
22. Gupta S., Davoodi H.R., Alonso-Terme R. Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?: International monetary fund. Working Paper. - Washington: IMF, 1998. - N 98/76. - 41 p.
23. Hammond C.J. Efficiency in the provision of public services: A data envelopment analysis of UK public library systems // Applied economics. - Buenos-Aires, 2002. - Vol. 34, N 5. - P. 649-657.
24. Heaton H. Productivity in service organizations. - N.Y.: McGraw Hill, 1977. - 233 p.
25. Holmberg S., Rothstein B., Nasiritousi N. Quality of government: What you get // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, 2009. - Vol. 12. - P. 135-161.
26. Hood C. New public management // International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences / N. Smelser, B. Baltes (eds). - Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001. - Vol. 12. - P. 12553-12556.
27. Hooghe L., Marks G. Does efficiency shape the territorial structure of government? // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, 2009. - Vol. 12. - P. 225-241.
28. Iftimoaei C. Toward a sociological approach of good governance // Scientific annals of the 'Al. I. Cuza' University, Iasi. Sociology & Social Work. - Iasi, 2015. - Vol. 8, Issue 1. - P. 101-119.
29. Inklaar R., Timmer M. Capital, labor and TFP in PWT8.0. - Groningen: Univ. of Groningen, 2013. - 38 p.
30. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. Measuring governance using perceptions data: International handbook on the economics of corruption / S. Rose-Ackerman (ed.). - Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, 2006. - 615 p.
31. Kelly R.M. Ideology, effectiveness, and public sector productivity: With illustrations from the field of higher education // Journal of social issues. - Hoboken, NJ, 1980. - Vol. 36, N 4. - P. 76-95.
32. Kervasdoué J. Rating and evaluating health systems: The value of the life expectancy approach // International public management journal. - L.: Taylor & Francis, 2008. - Vol. 11, N 3. - P. 329-343.
33. Kurtz M.J., Schrank A. Growth and governance: A defense // Journal of politics. - Chicago, 2007. - N 69. - P. 563-569.
34. Lee F.E. How party polarization affects governance // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, 2015. - Т. 18. - P. 261-282.
35. Lopez J.H. Pro-growth, pro-poor: Is there a tradeoff?: World Bank policy research working paper. - Washington, DC, 2010. - N 3378. - 29 p.
36. Organizational assessment: A framework for improving performance / C. Lusthaus, M.H. Adrien, G. Anderson, F. Carden, G.P. Montalvan. - Ottawa: International development research center, 2002. - 139 p.
37. North D.C., Weingast B.R., Wallis J. Violence and social orders: A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2009. - 346 p.
38. North D.C. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1990. - 159 p.
39. Quinn D.P., Woolley J.T. Democracy and national economic performance: The preference for stability // American journal of political science. - Hoboken, NJ, 2001. - Vol. 45, N 3. - P. 634-657.
40. Rauch J., Evans P. Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries // Journal of public economics. - Amsterdam, 2000. - Vol. 75 (1). - P. 49-71.
41. Rothstein B., Holmberg S. The quality of government: Corruption, Social trust, and inequality in international perspective. - Chicago: Univ. Chicago press, 2011. - 304 p.
42. Rothstein B., Teorell J. What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions // Governance. - San Diego, 2008. - С. 165-190.
43. Theories of the Policy Process / P. Sabatier (ed.). - 2 nd edition. - Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2007. - 352 p.
44. Simar L., Wilson P. Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes // Journal of econometrics. - Amsterdam, 2007. - N 136. - P. 31-64.
45. Waheed A., Mansor N., Ismail N. Delivering better government: Assessing the effectiveness of public sector organizations // Asia-Pacific social science review. - 2011. - N 11 (1). - P. 61-78.
46. Governance and development / World Bank. - Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992. - 69 p.
47. The state in a changing world / World Bank. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1997. - Mode of access: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/5980 (Дата посещения: 16.08.2016.)