Mathematical evaluations of development and use of westerntries` military capacity (on the example of Germany)
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.01.10
Abstract
We can face the fact that the factor of military power has been gaining increasing influence in the world politics. In this regard one of key tasks of international relations` studies is the exploration of armed forces` building of the countries in the dynamics. The creating a three-dimensional picture of these processes is difficult without the use of mathematical indicators, which show the key features and “narrow places” of the development and the usage of war machines’ potential of the key countries in the world arena.
In this article the focal case of these studies with the usage of mathematical assessments is the Bundeswehr. The reason of the given choice is the changing German role and place in the Euro-Atlantic community and the world arena as the whole. Germany has been trying to become the status of full-fare world power. One of the inherent features of this process is the growing of the Bundeswehr`s potential that had begun in the second half of 2010-s and has had the perspective by the middle 2030-s.
The article presents mathematical indicators that allow to show a more voluminous assessment of the progress of building the Bundeswehr's potential and German military budget (both in general and in terms of articles of spending and other specific indicators) in comparison with other largest NATO member states. The research paper also examines the indicators that make it possible to “highlight” the peculiarities of the
Bundeswehr’s usage outside and inside the NATO zone of responsibility as well as issues the evolution of the foreign (allied) military presence on the territory of the FRG. The author tries to conclude the generalizations of German “war machine” development, basing on 11 mathematical indicators, 6 of which introduced into scientific circulation for the first time.
About the Author
Ph. O. TrunovRussian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Останков В.И. Успешное решение проблем строительства Вооруженных сил – важнейшее условие обеспечения национальной безопасности // Военная безопасность Российской Федерации в XXI веке : сб. науч. ст. / под ред. ген.-полк. Ю.Н. Балуевского. – М. : ЦВСИ, 2004. – С. 210–226.
2. Разин Е.А. История военного искусства. – СПб.: Полигон, 1999. – T. 1. – 560 с. Assessing the conventional force imbalance in Europe: Implications for countering
3. Russian local superiority. Research Report / S. Boston, M. Johnson, N. BeauchampMustafaga, Y. Crane : RAND Corporation research report – 2018. – 15 p. – Mode of access: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2402.html (accessed: 27.10.2020).
4. Die Auslandseinsätze der Bundeswehr in Wandel / R. Glatz, W. Hansen, M. Kaim, J. Vorrath. – Berlin : German institute for international and security affairs, stiftung wissenschaft und politik, 2018. – 52 p.
5. European strategic autonomy / B. Lippert, N. von Ondazra, V. Perthers (eds). – Berlin : German institute for international and security affairs, stiftung wissenschaft und politik, 2019. – 39 p. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.18449/2019RP04
6. Fleckenstein B. Fremde Truppen im Vereinigten Deutschland – Gegenwärtige Situation und künftige Aussichten // SOWI-Arbeitspapier. – 1990. – N 44. – S. 1–12.
7. Glatz R., Zapfe M. Ambitionierte Rahmennation: Deutshcland in der NATO // SWPAktuell. – 2017. – N 62. – S. 1–8.
8. Major C. Die Rolle der NATO für Europas Verteidigung. – Berlin : Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2019. – 42 S. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.18449/2019S25
9. Major C. Eine schwieriger Gipfel für NATO // SWP-Aktuell. – 2018. – N 33. – S. 1–4.
10. Przemieniecki J.S. Mathematical methods in defense analyses. – N.Y. : AIAA education series, 2000. – 398 p. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/4.862137
11. Schulz R. Allgemeiner Gesellschaftdienst // SWP-Aktuell. – 2020. – N 57. –S. 1–4. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.18449/2020A57