Preview

Political science

Advanced search

In search of a new world order: interests of actors of world politics

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.02.05

Abstract

The article analyzes the reasons why, on the one hand, special attention is currently being paid to the analysis of the modern world order, on the other – the world order has remained uncertain for 30 years. It is shown, that the world order (understood in most studies as the relationship between the leading states of the world) is only part of the political organization of the world. The political organization of the world is at least a three-level system, which, along with the system of interstate relations, includes as a basis the principles of the Westphalian model of the world, where the main principle is sovereignty, as well as the political systems of various states of the world. Due to the fact, that the basis of the political organization of the world (the Westphalian model) is being eroded, the question of the system of interstate relations becomes largely irrelevant. The interests of various actors in world politics become important for understanding how the political organization of the world will be formed. The article analyzes the interests of states, international organizations, business structures, subnational territories, as well as universities, the media and international NGOs. The article shows that, in modern conditions, the economic and humanitarian interests of various actors are converted into political interests. This gives a reason to believe that the political organization of the world of the future (the political architecture of the world) will not be able to ignore the interests of various actors in world politics. The author states that there will be further transnationalization of actors associated not only with globalization defined as the transparency of national borders, but also with the interaction, and sometimes “sprouting” of the structures of some actors into the structures of other actors. One of the most important parameters of building a new architecture of world politics will be network relations. At the same time, digital technologies will be actively introduced into international political practice, which will affect the political organization of the world, just as the industrial revolution once influenced the development of capitalism.

About the Author

M. M. Lebedeva
MGIMO University
Russian Federation

Lebedeva Marina

Moscow



References

1. Baranovsky V.G. Regional dimension of international relations // International relations: facets of the present and the future. – Moscow: RIAC, 2023. – P. 359–389. (In Russ.)

2. Bogdanov A.N. On the threshold of a "Bipolar World"? on the prospects of systemic confrontation in the XXI century // Vlast – 2016. – No. 2. – pp. 5-11. (In Russ.)

3. Castells M. The informational city: information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989, 408 p.

4. Coen D., Richardson J. (eds). Lobbying the European Union: institutions, actors and issues. New York: Oxford university press, 2009, 400 р.

5. Fenenko A. World order as a theoretical and methodological category // International processes. 2023, No. 21 (1), pp. 6–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.1.72.8 (In Russ.)

6. Flyverbom M. The power of networks: organizing the global politics of the Internet. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. 2011, 224 р.

7. Fujita M. The transnational activities of small and medium-sized enterprises. Dordrecht A.O.: Kluver, 1998, 257 p.

8. Gateway to the global economy / edited by O.E. Andersson and D.E. Andersson, trans. from English under. ed. by V.M. Sergeev. – Moscow: Fazis, 2001. – 440 p. (In Russ.)

9. Gilpin R. The theory of hegemonic war. The journal of interdisciplinary history. 1988, Vol. 18, N 4, P. 591–613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/204816

10. Hirblinger A.T. When mediators need machines (and vice versa): towards a research agenda on hybrid peacemaking intelligence. International negotiation. 2023, Vol. 28, N 1, P. 94–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718069-bja10050

11. Katzenstein P.J., Keohane R.J., Krasner S.D. International organization and the study of world politics. International organization. 1998, Vol. 52, N 4, P. 645–686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003558X

12. Kennedy P. The rise and fall of the great powers: economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987, 677 p.

13. Kharkevich M.V. The state in modern world politics // MGIMO Review of International Relations 2010. No. 6 (15), pp. 160–166. (In Russ.)

14. Kissinger H. World order. – Mjscow: AST, 2015. – 540 p. (In Russ.)

15. Larionova M., Kirton J. Global Governance After the COVID-19 Crisis. International Organisations Research Journal, 2020, vol. 15, no 2, pp. 7–23 (In English). DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2020-02-01

16. Lebedeva M.M. Modern megatrends of world politics // World Economy and International Relations 2019, V. 63, No. 9, p. 29–37. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2019-63-9-29-37 (In Russ.)

17. Lebedeva M.M. Such different states // “Privatization” of world politics: local actions – global results / ed. prof. MM. Lebedeva. – Moscow: Golden-B, 2008. – P. 91–99. (In Russ.)

18. Lebedeva M.M. System of Political organization of the world: ‘Perfect storm’. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2016. No 2(47), p. 125–133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2016-2-47-134-144

19. Nye J. Soft power: the evolution of a concept. Journal of Political Power. 2021, Vol. 14, N 1, Р. 196–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2021.1879572

20. Nye J. The paradox of American power: why the world’s only superpower can’t go it alone. New York: Oxford university press, 2002, 240 р.

21. Nye J.S., Keohane R.O. Transnational relations and world politics: an introduction. International organization. 1971, Vol. 25, N 3, Р. 329–349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026187

22. Prokhorenko I.L. The place and role of international organizations in the future architecture of the world order. International relations: facets of the present and future. – Moscow: RIAC, 2023, p. 390–405. (In Russ.)

23. Rosenau J. Turbulence in world politics: a theory of change and continuity. Princeton: Princeton university press, 1990, 504 p.

24. Sassen S. The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press, 1991, 397 p.

25. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. – Moscow: EKSMO. – 229 p. (In Russ.)

26. Slaughter A.-M. A new world order. Princeton, N: Princeton university press, 2004, 368 р.

27. Tyukaeva T.I. World political influence of global media: constructivist approach // MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2017, No. 4(55), pp. 242–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2017-4-55-242-271 (In Russ.)


Review

Views: 390


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)