The potential of the narrative analysis method, or how to identify political values in Russian cinema
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.04.02
Abstract
In the context of the high activity of various government bodies in constructing and widely disseminating value paradigms through popular culture, there is a need to find relevant methods that allow the most systematic approach to the analysis of values contained in products of this type of culture. Based on a review of the existing experience in conducting narrative studies, the methodological features of narrative analysis are highlighted, features that distinguish it from the method of discourse analysis are indicated. The paper discoveres the grounds for considering a movie as an object of narrative analysis. This article attempts to determine the possibilities of using narrative analysis to study political values in national cinema. Based on existing approaches, the authors propose a scheme for conducting narrative analysis aimed at finding narratives in films that reflect certain political values. Using the example of the 2023 movie “At the Pike’s Command”, the proposed narrative analysis algorithm was demonstrated in detail, including three consecutive stages. As one of the results of the work, the possibilities and limitations of narrative analysis as one among the classic qualitative methods are indicated.
About the Authors
I. A. PomiguevRussian Federation
Pomiguev Ilya A.
Moscow
T. L. Prokopchuk
Russian Federation
Prokopchuk Tatyana L.
Moscow
A. V. Koshkin
Russian Federation
Koshkin Andrey V.
Saint Petersburg; Moscow
References
1. Althusser L. Letter on the cognition of art (reply to André Daspre). In: Althusser L. (ed.). On art. Moscow: V-A-C press, Artguide Editions, 2019, P. 44–59. (In Russ.)
2. Carnaghan E. Out of order: Russian political values in an imperfect world. University Park: Pennsylvania state university press, 2007, 330 p. (In Russ.)
3. Chatman S. Story and discourse: narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell university press, 1978, 277 p.
4. Chatman S. Coming to terms: the rhetoric of narrative in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cor- nell university press, 1990, 240 p.
5. Creswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among ve ap- proaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2007, 395 p.
6. Espedal G., Carlsen A. Don’t pass them by: figuring the sacred in organizational values work. Journal of business ethics. 2019, Vol. 169, N 3, P. 767–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04266-w
7. Espedal G., Synnes O. A narrative approach to exploring values in organisations. In: Espedal, G., Jelstad Løvaas B., Sirris S., Wæraas, A. (eds). Researching values. Methodological approaches for understanding values work in organisations and leadership. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, P. 189–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90769-3_11
8. Fisher W.R. Human communication as narration: toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1987, 201 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nwbqtk
9. Franzosi R., De Fazio G., Vicari S. Ways of measuring agency: An application of quan- titative narrative analysis to lynchings in Georgia (1875-1930). Sociological metho- dology. 2012, N 42, P. 1–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012462370
10. Huhn P. Event and eventfullness. In: Jannidis F., Martinez M., Pier J., Schmid W. (eds). Handbook of narratology. New York; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2009, P. 80–97.
11. Ignatov G., Michalcha R. Text mining. Intellectual analysis of text: design, research, data col- lection and methods of analysis. Kharkov: Humanitarian Centre, 2021, 344 р. (In Russ.)
12. Jones M.D., McBeth M.K., Shanahan E.A. The narrative policy framework. In: Jones M.D., McBeth M.K., Shanahan E.A. (eds). Narratives and the policy process: applications of the narrative policy framework. Montana: Montana state university library, 2022, P. 2–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15788/npf
13. Labov W., Waletsky J. Narrative analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In: Helm J. (ed.). Essays on the verbal and the visual arts. Seattle, London: University of Washington Press, 1967, P. 3–38.
14. Leeds-Hurwitz W. Social construction of reality. In: Littlejohn S., Foss K. (eds). Ency- clopedia of communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009, P. 892–895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412959384.n344
15. Lieblich A., Tuval-Mashiach R., Zilber T. Narrative research: reading, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998, 187 p. Linde Ch. Life stories: the creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford university press, 1993, 256 p.
16. Linde Ch. Narrative and social tacit knowledge. Journal of knowledge management. 2001, Vol. 5, N 2, P. 160–171.
17. Lotman Y.M. Semiotics of cinema and problems of film aesthetics. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat, 1973, 135 p. (In Russ.)
18. Mische A. Measuring futures in action: projective grammars in the Rio+20 debates. Theory and society. 2014, N 43, P. 437–464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-014-9226-3
19. Onwuegbuzie A.J., Abrams S.S. Towards mixed methods narrative inquiry and mixed methods narrative research that are transparent, rigorous, ethical, and equitable (TREE). Journal of mixed methods studies. 2024, N 9, P. 82–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59455/jomes.2024.9.2
20. Propp V. Morphology of a fairy tale. London: Academia, 1928, 152 p. (In Russ.)
21. Rothlin S. The Evasive hero: narrative analysis of values in Asian movies. La civilta cattolica. 2021, Vol. 4107, N 178, P. 302–315. (In Italian)
22. Selezneva A.V. Methodology for the study of political ideas and values. Bulletin of Moscow University. 2011, N 2, P. 42–53. (In Russ.)
23. Schmid W. Narratology. Moscow: Languages of Slavic culture, 2003, 312 p. (In Russ.)