Methodology of contextualism, its achievements and problems (Review)
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2025.02.11
Abstract
.
References
1. Atnashev T., Velizhev M. (eds). Cambridge School: theory and practice of intellectual history. Moscow: New Literary Review, 2018, 632 p. (In Russ.)
2. Atnashev T., Velizhev M. History of political languages in Russia: towards the methodology of the research program. Philosophy: Journal of the higher school of economics. 2018, Vol. 2, N 3, P. 107–137. (In Russ.)
3. Belyavsky B.A. Cambridge school: import and modernization of the method of historical analysis: review of the collection “Cambridge School: theory and practice of intellectual history”. Philosophy. Journal of the higher school of economics. 2020, Vol. 4, N 3, P. 217–229. (In Russ.)
4. Brunner O., Conze W., Koselleck R. (eds). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 2004, Vol. 1–8, 9000 р. (In German)
5. Koselleck R. Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1979, 389 S. (In German)
6. Koselleck R., Mommsen W., Rüsen J. (eds). Beiträge zur Historik. Bd. 1: Objektivität und Parteilichkeit in der Geschichtswissenschaft. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch-Verlag, 1977, 495 S. (In German)
7. Pavlov A.V. Adventures of method: Cambridge School (of political thought) in contexts. Logos. 2018, N 4, P. 263–303. (In Russ.)
8. Rüsen J. Grundzuge einer Historik. Bochum, 2018, 369 S. (In German)
Review
Views:
71
Email this article 
Post a Comment 