Introducing the issue

1. Bevir M., Kedar A. Concept formation in political science: An anti-naturalist critique of qualitative methodology. Perspectives on politics. 2008, N 6 (3), P. 503–517.

2. Edelman M. Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. Chicago: Markham publishing company, 1971, 188 p.

3. Kagarlitsky Yu., Maslov B. Between Frege and Foucault: Methodological guidelines of historical semantics. In: Kagarlitsky Yu., Kalugin D., Maslov B. (eds). Concepts, ideas, constructions: essays on comparative historical semantics. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019, P. 9–38. (In Russ.)

4. Losev A.F. The problem of symbol and realistic art. Moscow: Iskusstvo, 1995, 320 p. (In Russ.)

5. Lotman Yu. M. Symbol in the system of culture. In: Lotman Yu.M. What people learn. Articles and notes. Moscow: Tsentr knigi VGBIL im. M.I. Rudomino, 2010, P. 293–308. (In Russ.)

6. Malinova O. Yu. Symbolic politics: the contours of the problem field. In: Malinova O. (ed.). Symbolic politics. Issue 1: Constructing ideas about the past as a power resource. Moscow: INION RAN, 2012, P. 5–16. (In Russ.)

7. Malinova O.Yu. Temporality and other properties of the symbolic in politics. In: Malinova O. (ed.). Symbolic Politics. Issue 2: Debating the Past as Designing the Future. Moscow: INION RAN, 2014, P. 5–17 (In Russ.)

8. Mead G.H. The social psychology of George Herbert Mead. In: Strauss A. (ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956, Vol. 16, 298 p.

9. Potseluev S.P. Symbolic politics: A constellation of concepts for approaching the problem. Polis. Political Studies. 1999, N 5, P. 62–76. (In Russ.)

10. Sartori J. The Towel of Babel. In: Collier D., Gerring J. (eds). Concepts and method in social science. The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. New York: Routledge, 2009, P. 61–96.

11. Schwartz-Shea P., Yanow D. Interpretative research design: Concepts and process. New York: Routledge, 2012, Vol. 14, 184 p.