КОНЦЕПТУАЛИЗАЦИЯ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЙ СОСТОЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ: ДИНАМИЧЕСКИЙ И СТАТИСТИЧЕСКИЙ ПОДХОДЫ
Аннотация
В статье автором рассматриваются различные подходы к концептуализации термина «государственная состоятельность», а также обозначены основные трудности концептуализации данного термина. На основе анализа различных подходов автором выработано свое инструментальное определение состоятельности. Основной акцент сделан на группе подходов, описывающих динамическую и статическую состоятельность, а также на подходах, описывающих различные формы государственной несостоятельности.
Список литературы
1. Барабанов О.Н. История мировой политики. – М.: МГИМО, 2006. – 328 с.
2. Ильин М.В. Возможна ли универсальная типология государств? // Политическая наука: Сб. науч. тр. / РАН. ИНИОН, Ред. кол.: Ю.С. Пивоваров, гл. ред., и др. – М., 2008. – № 4. – С. 8–41.
3. Суверенитет. Трансформация понятий и практик / Под ред. М.В. Ильина, И.В. Кудряшовой. – М.: МГИМО-Университет, 2008. – 228 с.
4. Bartolini S. Restructuring Europe. Centre formation, system building, and political structuring between the nation state and the European Union. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 2005. – 415 p.
5. Beyond state crisis? Postcolonial Africa and post-Soviet Eurasia in comparative perspective / Beissinger M. R., Young C. (eds). – Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2002. – 514 p.
6. Policy brief / The Brookings Institution. – Washington, D.C., 2003. – N 116, February.
7. Daskalovski Z. Democratic consolidation and the «stateness» problem: The case of Macedonia // Ethnopolitics. – Basingstoke, Hants, 2004. – Vol. 3, N 2. – P. 52–66.
8. Elkins Z., Sides J. Seeking stateness / Department of political science,Univ. of Illinois; Department of political science, George Washington univ., 2008. – Mode of access: http://home.gwu.edu/~jsides/stateness.pdf (Дата обращения: 15.08.2012.)
9. Evans P. The Eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization // World politics. – Baltimore, 1997. – N 50. – P. 62–87.
10. Evans P. Embedded autonomy. States and industrial transformation. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1995. – 323 p.
11. The failed states index / The Fund of peace. – 2011. – Mode of access: http://www. fundforpeace.org/global/?q=fsi (Дата посещения: 25.01.2012.)
12. The formation of national states in Western Europe / Tilly Ch (ed.). – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1975. – 711 p.
13. Fukuyama F. The missing dimension of stateness. – 2006. – Mode of access: http://giptsi.upf.edu/xavier/teaching/cpd/readings/fukuyama-en.pdf (Дата посещения: 26.05.2012.)
14. Fukuyama F. «Stateness» first // Journal of democracy. – Baltimore, MD, 2005. – Vol. 16, N 1. – P. 84–88.
15. Grindle M.S. Challenging the state: Crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1996. – 243 p.
16. Jackson R. Quasi-states: Sovereignty, international relations, and the Third World. – N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1990. – 225 p.
17. Jackson R., Sorensen G. Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2010. – 337 p.
18. Jessop B. State theory. Putting the capitalist state in its place. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1990. – 413 p.
19. Kolsto P. The sustainability and future of unrecognized quasi-states // Journal of peace research. – L., 2006. – Vol. 43, N 6. – P. 723–740.
20. Krasner S.D. Problematic sovereignty: Contested rules and political possibilities. – N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 2001. – 367 p.
21. Lapidus G.W. Ethnicity and state-building: Accommodating ethnic difference in post-Soviet Eurasia // Beyond State Crisis? Postcolonial Africa and Post-Soviet Eurasia in Comparative Perspective / Beissinger M. R., Young C. (eds). – Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2002. – P. 323–358.
22. Linz J., Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation. – Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins univ. press, 1996. – 479 p.
23. Katzenstein P.J. Small states in world markets. – Ithaca, NY: Cornell univ. press, 1985. – 268 p.
24. Kjær A.M., Hansen O.H., Thomsen J.P.F. Conceptualizing state capacity / Department of political science, University of Aarhus. – Aarhus, 2002. – (DEMSTAR research report; N 6). – Mode of access: http://www.demstar.dk/papers/ConceptualizingStateCapacity.pdf (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
25. Migdal J.S. Strong societies and weak states. State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. – Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 1988. – 296 p.
26. Nettl J.P. The state as a conceptual variable // World Politics. – Princeton, 1968. – Vol. 20, N 4. – P. 559–592.
27. Nye J.S. Jr. Soft power: The means to success in world politics. – N.Y.: Public Affairs, 2004. – 191 p.
28. Organski A.F.K., Kugler J. The war ledger. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1980. – 292 p.
29. Ostrom E. Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy and development // World development. – Oxford, 1996. – Vol. 24, N 6. – P. 1073–1087.
30. Pegg S. International society and the de facto state. – Brookfield, Vt.: Ashgate, 1998. – 308 p.
31. Lynch D. Separatist states and post-Soviet conflicts // International affairs. – Cambridge, 2002. – N 78. – P. 831–848.
32. Pfister T. From state to stateness: draft. – August 2004 / Queen’s univ., Belfast School of politics and international studies, 2004. – Mode of access: http://www.qub.ac.uk/polproj/reneg/pdfs/Pfister-From_State_to_Stateness%20.pdf (Дата обращения: 15.08.2012.)
33. Posner D.N. Civil society and the reconstruction of failed states // When states fail: causes and consequences / Rotberg I. R. (ed.). – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 2004. – P. 237–255. – Mode of access: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/posner/pdfs/civil_soc_recon.pdf (Дата посещение: 15.08.2012.)
34. Putnam R.D. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1994. – 258 p.
35. Stiglitz J. Redefining the role of the state: What should it do? How should it do it? And how should these decisions be made?: Paper presented at the Tenth Anniversary of MITI Research Institute, Tokyo, 1998. – 17 March.
36. Weihe T. Cooperatives in conflict and failed states: Presentation to AIARD, June 8, 2004. – Washington, DC: U.S. Overseas Cooperative Development Council, 2004. – 1 CD-ROM; 4 3/4 in.
37. Weiss L. The myth of the powerless state. Governing the economy in a global era. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. – 260 p.
38. Williamson J. What should the World Bank think about the Washington consensus? // The World Bank Research Observer. – Washington, D.C., 2000. – N 15. – P. 251–264.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
54
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 