Turkey: National interests and imperial legacy
Abstract
The article discusses the Turkey's modern foreign policy, often referred to as «Neo-Ottomanism». In this context it gives the analysis of the historical Ottomanism, as well as the development of «Neo-Ottomanism» concept by T. Ozal and its present interpretation and implementation. The authors believe that Neo-Ottomanism is not a restoration of imperial practice, but a form of historical continuity and a civilizational dimension of the national identity.
About the Authors
I. V. Kudryashova
МГИМО-Университет; ИНИОН РАН
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
V. V. Matyukhin
МГИМО-Университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Adanir F. Turkey’s entry into the concert of Europe // European review. – Cambridge, 2005. – Vol. 13, N 3. – P. 395–417.
2. Bali R. Politics of turkification during the single party period // Turkey: nationalism, post-nationalism and the European Community / Kieser H.L. (ed.) – L.; N.Y.: I.B. Taurus, 2006. – P. 43–49.
3. Barchard D. Turkey and the West. – L.; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1985. – 100 p.
4. Bayar A. Neo-Osmanlilar // Aktüel. – Istanbul, 1992. – June 17, N 49. – Цит. по: Mufti M. Daring and caution in Turkish foreign policy // The Middle East journal. – Wash., D.C. – 1988. – Vol. 52, N 1. – P. 46–49.
5. Borovalı A.F. Post-modernity, multiculturalism and ex-imperial Hinterland: Habsburg and Ottoman legacies revisited // Perceptions: Journal of international affairs. – Ankara, 1997. – Vol. 2, N 4. – P. 122–134.
6. Constantinides S. Turkey: the emergence of a new foreign policy. The Neo-Ottoman imperial model // Journal of political and military sociology. – Cambridge, 1996. – Vol. 24. – P. 323–334.
7. Yazdir H. Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye'nin uluslararası konumu. – Istanbul: Küre Yayınları, 2009. – 584 s.
8. Yazdir H. Davutoğlu:Yeni Osmanlıcılıktan öte misyonumuz var // Yeni Şafak. – Istanbul, 2012. – Mode of access: http://yenisafak.com.tr/politika-haber/davutogluyeniosmanliciliktan-ote-misyonumuz-var-03.11.2012-420574 (Дата посещения: 15.05.2013.)
9. Erşen E. Turkish foreign policy and Russian-Turkish relations: Lecture given at MGIMO-University, 12 April 2012. – [Из личного архива И.В. Кудряшовой].
10. Esherick J.W., Kayali H., Van Young E. Introduction // Empire to nation: historical perspectives on the making of the modern world / Esherick J.W., Kayali H., Van Young E. (eds.). – Lanham; Boulder; N.Y.; Toronto; Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2006. – 430 p.
11. Inalcik H. The Meaning of legacy: the Ottoman case // Imperial legacy: the Ottoman imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East / Brown C.L. (ed.). – N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 1996. – P. 17–29.
12. Karpat K.H. The politicization of Islam: reconstructing identity, state, faith and community in the late Ottoman state. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 2001. – 533 p.
13. Kouskouvelis I. The problem with Turkey's «zero problems» // Middle East quarterly. – Philadelphia, Pen. – 2013. – Vol. 20, N 1. – P. 47–56.
14. Laçiner S. Özalism (Neo-Ottomanism): an alternative in Turkish foreign policy? // Journal of administrative sciences. – Montreal, 2003. – Vol. 1, N 1–2. – P. 161–202.
15. Lieven D. Empire: The Russian empire and its rivals. – L.: John Murray Publishers, 2000. – 486 p.
16. Policy of zero problems with our neighbors // Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey. The official site. – Mode of access: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/policy-of-zero-problems-with-our-neighbors.en.mfa (Дата посещения: 20.03.2013.)
17. Sözen A. A paradigm shift in Turkish foreign policy: transition and challenges // Turkish studies. – Essex, 2010. – Vol. 11, N 1. – P. 103–123.
18. Taşpınar Ö. The three strategic visions of Turkey // US-Europe analyses series. – Wash. D.C., 2011. – Mode of access: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/
19. files/papers/2011/3/08%20turkey%20taspinar/0308_turkey_taspinar.pdf (Дата посещения: 14.05.2013.)
20. Taşpınar Ö. Turkey's strategic vision and Syria // Washington quarterly. – Wash. D.C., 2012. – Vol. 35, N 3. – P. 127–140.
21. Terzi O. The influence of European Union on Turkish foreign policy. – Farnham; Burlington: Ashgate Publishing, 2010. – 176 p.
22. Trifkovic S. Turkey as a regional power: Neo-Ottomanism in action // Политеиа. – Баня-Лука, 2011. – N 2. – С. 83–95.
23. Türkiye'nin bölgeye ilgisi gereklilik değil ihtiyaç // Turkcebilgi.org. – 2009. – September, 4. – Mode of access: http://www.turkcebilgi.org/haberler/guncel/turkiyenin-bolgeye-ilgisi-gereklilik-degil-ihtiyac-317990.html (Дата посещения: 15.03.2013.)
24. Yavuz H. Turkish identity and foreign policy in flux: the rise of Neo-Ottomanism // Critique: critical Middle Eastern studies. – L., 1998. – Vol. 7, N 12. – P. 19–41.
25. Бахревский Е. Политика «нового османизма» Турции и постсоветское пространство // Charta Caucasica. – 2011. – Ноябрь, 17. – Режим доступа: http://www.caucasica.org/
26. analytics/detail.php?ID=2077 (Дата посещения: 01.03.2013.)
27. Еремеев Д.Е. На стыке Азии и Европы: очерки о Турции и турках. – М.: Наука, 1980. – 238 c.
28. Люкманов А. Модернизация «по-османски» // Международная жизнь. – М., 2011. – № 10. – С. 35–49.
29. Пантин В.И. Национально-цивилизационная идентичность как фактор современного политического развития // Политическая идентичность и политика идентичности: В 2 тт. / Под ред. Семененко И.С. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2012. – Т. 2.: Идентичность и социально-политические изменения в XXI веке. – С. 116–132.
30. Фадеева И.Л. Официальные доктрины в идеологии и политике Османской империи (османизм – панисламизм), XIX – начало XX в. – М.: Наука, 1985. – 271 с.
31. Шлыков П. Ближневосточная политика Турции в контексте «арабской весны» // Фонд исторической перспективы. – 2012. – Декабрь, 17. – Режим доступа: http://www.perspektivy.info/oykumena/vostok/blizhnevostochnaja_politika_turcii_v_kontekste_arabskoj_vesny_2012-12-17.htm (Дата посещения: 16.03.2013.)
Review
Views:
192
Email this article 
Post a Comment 