Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Human rights and emancipation

Abstract

The emancipatory potential of the idea of human rights in contemporary world is significantly limited due to the fact that it is often presented as a product of the Western civilization, which does not suit the political and cultural reality of non-Western countries. This article attempts to reassess universality of human rights from the point of view of poststructuralist hegemony theory. Hegemonic universality, which relies on Western dominance in world affairs, is indeed imperfect, and this is most evident in the peripheral countries, where the need to correlate universal norms with the particularity of Western hegemony dramatically distorts political process. This point is illustrated using the example of the inversion of the universal norm in the criminal case against the members of the Russian «Pussy Riot» punk band and the surrounding debate. Going beyond hegemonic universality necessitates a search for the new forms of the political. The article discusses one of the tentative ways to rethink human rights along these lines with a reference to Alain Badiou’s generic philosophy of the event.

About the Author

V. E. Morozov
Тартуский университет (Эстония)
Russian Federation


References

1. Бадью А. Мета / Политика: можно ли мыслить политику?: Краткий трактат по метаполитике. – М.: Логос, 2005. – 240 с.

2. Бадью А. Этика. Очерк о сознании зла. – СПб.: Machina, 2006. – 126 с.

3. Проблемы реализации свободы совести в России в 2012 году / Под ред. А. Верховского. – М.: Информационно-аналитический центр «Сова», 2013. – Режим доступа: http://www.sova–center.ru/religion/publications/2013/04/d26820/ (Дата посещения: 12.06.2013.)

4. Текст приговора Pussy Riot // Газета. Ru. – М., 2012. – 21 августа. – Режим доступа: http://www.gazeta.ru/social/photo/pussy_riot.shtml (Дата посещения: 12.06.2013.)

5. Капустин Б.Г. «Национальный интерес» как консервативная утопия // Свободная мысль. – М., 1996. – № 3. – С. 13–29.

6. Копосов Н.Е. Как думают историки. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2001. – 326 с.

7. Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Немецкая идеология. – М.: Политиздат, 1988. – 574 с.

8. Морозов В.Е. О коварстве Запада и его разоблачителях: внешнеполитическая мысль и самоизоляция России // Неприкосновенный запас. – М., 2005. – № 5. – C. 16–21.

9. Морозов В.Е. Запад без кавычек: глобальная гегемония и российский вызов // Свободная мысль. – М., 2009 a. – № 11. – С. 47–60.

10. Морозов В.Е. Россия и Другие: идентичность и границы политического сообщества. – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2009 b. – 656 с.

11. Госдума может принять закон о защите чувств верующих в весеннюю сессию // РИА Новости. – М., 2013. – 22 мая. – Режим доступа: http://ria.ru/society/20130522/938864954.html#ixzz2Vj2fjYMv (Дата посещения: 12.06.2013.)

12. Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек. – М.: АСТ, 2007. – 588 с.

13. Хоркхаймер М., Адорно Т. Диалектика Просвещения. Философские фрагменты. – М., СПб.: Медиум: Ювента, 1997. – 312 с.

14. Badiou A. Being and event. – N.Y.: Continuum, 2005. – 526 p.

15. Bonnett A. the idea of the West: Culture, politics and history. – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. – 201 p.

16. The Struggle for the West: A divided and contested legacy / Browning S., Lehti M. (Eds.). – L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2010. – 236 p.

17. Carol S., Koopmans R. Dynamics of contestation over Islamic religious rights in Europe // Ethnicities. – L., 2013. – Vol. 13, N 2. – P. 165–190.

18. Charvet J., Kaczynska-Nay E. The liberal project and human rights: The theory and practice of a new world order. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2008. – 434 p.

19. Gramsci A. Selections from prison notebooks. – L.: Lawrence &Wishart, 1971. – 483 p.

20. Civilizational identity: The production and reproduction of «civilizations» in international relations / Hall M., Jackson P.T. (Eds.). – N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. – 242 p.

21. Donnnelly J. International human rights. – Boulder: Westview, 2007. – 247 p.

22. Hallward P. Badiou: A subject to truth. – Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota press, 2003. – 512 p.

23. Haritaworn J. Women’s rights, gay rights and anti-Muslim racism in Europe: Introduction // European journal of women’s studies. – L., 2012. – Vol. 19, N 1. – P. 73–78.

24. The invention of tradition / Hobsbawm E., Ranger T. (eds.) – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1983. – 322 p.

25. Laclau E. Emancipation (s). – L.: Verso, 1996. – 124 p.

26. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy. – L.: Verso, 1985. – 197 p.

27. Lægaard S. Normative interpretations of diversity: The Muhammad cartoons controversy and the importance of context // Ethnicities. – L., 2009. – Vol. 9, N 3. – P. 314–333.

28. Lazarus S. Anthropologie du nom. – Paris: Seuil, 1996. – 248 p.

29. Masuzawa T. The invention of world religions. – Chicago: Univ. of Chicago press, 2005. – 384 p.

30. Mbembe A. On the postcolony. – Berkeley: Univ. of California press, 2001. – 274 p.

31. Decentring the West: The idea of democracy and the struggle for hegemony / Morozov V. (Ed.). – Aldershot: Ashgate, 2013. – 207 p.

32. Morozov V. Resisting entropy, discarding human rights. Romantic realism and securitization of identity in Russia // Cooperation and conflict. – L.: Sage, 2002. – Vol. 37, N 4. – P. 409–430.

33. Morozov V. Subaltern empire? Toward a postcolonial approach to Russian foreign policy // Problems of post–communism. – Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2013. Vol. 60. – Forthcoming.

34. Passeron J.-C. Le raisonnement sociologique: L’espace non-poppérien du raisonnement naturel. – Paris: Nathan, 1991. – 408 p.

35. Pahuja S. Decolonising international law: Development, economic growth and the politics of universality. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2011. – 303 p.

36. Prozorov S. Generic universalism in world politics // International theory. – Cambridge, 2009. – Vol. 1, N 2. – P. 215–247.

37. Razack S. Dangerous Muslim men, imperilled Muslim women and civilized Europeans: Legal and social responses to forced marriages // Feminist legal studies. – Dordrecht, 2004. – Vol. 12, N 2. – P. 129–174.

38. Seib Ph. Religious freedom and US public diplomacy // The review of faith & international affairs. – L., 2013. – Vol. 11, N 1. – P. 15–21.

39. Spivak G.Ch. Can the subaltern speak? // Marxism and the interpretation of culture / Ed. by C. Nelson, L. Grossberg. – Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1988. – P. 271–313.

40. Wetherly P. Freedom of expression, multiculturalism, and the «Danish cartoons» // Islam in the West: Key issues in multiculturalism / M. Farrar, S. Robinson, Y. Valli, P. Wetherly (eds.). – Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. – P. 36–55.

41. Žižek S. The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. – L., N.Y.: Verso, 1999. – 409 p.


Review

Views: 85


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)