Liberalism and nature
Abstract
Are liberal and environmental concerns incompatible? Distinguishing between classical and social liberalism, and between environmentalism (seeing nature as resources) and ecologism (seeing it as in itself valuable), this text discusses the areas of genuine conflict. Three such areas are identified: 1) liberalism, despite its preference for ethical neutrality, ignores the non-political, and has thus never developed any other notion of nature than as the other of humanity; 2) liberalism seems to be incurably anthropocentric; and 3) liberalism supports individual property rights to the disadvantage of ecologically minded ethics. Li-
beral authors have, over the past 25 years, adopted many environmentalist and even ecologist ideas: they have made room for an appreciation of nature as more than resources only, as important to others than presently existing humans only, and as worth protecting against undesirable consequencesofpropertyrights.There is no fundamental contradiction between affirming human dignity through individual emancipation, and protecting nature; the two may even reinforce one another. There remain contradictions between liberalism and ecologism as political theories: liberalism is by definition an individualist theory stressing individual rights including property rights, and it embraces moral pluralism, thus by definition rejecting the idea of a unique (ecological) road to salvation.
beral authors have, over the past 25 years, adopted many environmentalist and even ecologist ideas: they have made room for an appreciation of nature as more than resources only, as important to others than presently existing humans only, and as worth protecting against undesirable consequencesofpropertyrights.There is no fundamental contradiction between affirming human dignity through individual emancipation, and protecting nature; the two may even reinforce one another. There remain contradictions between liberalism and ecologism as political theories: liberalism is by definition an individualist theory stressing individual rights including property rights, and it embraces moral pluralism, thus by definition rejecting the idea of a unique (ecological) road to salvation.
About the Authors
Марсель Виссенбург
Университет Радбуд, Неймеген, Нидерланды
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
M. Wissenburg
Russian Federation
References
1. Achterberg W. Can liberal democracy survive the environmental crisis? / The politics of nature: Explorations in green political theory / Ed. by A.N.H. Dobson, P. Lucardie. - L.: Routledge, 1993. - P. 81-101.
2. Anderson T., Leal D. Free market environmentalism. - Boulder: Westview press, 1991. - 192 p.
3. Barry B. Democracy, power and justice. - Oxford: Clarendon press, 1989. - 565 p.
4. Barry B. Justice as impartiality. - Oxford: Clarendon press, 1995. - 299 p.
5. Barry J. Rethinking green politics. - London: Sage, 1999. - viii , 291 p.
6. Bell D. How can political liberals be environmentalists? // Political studies. - Oxford, 2002. - Vol. 50. - P. 703-724.
7. Carter A. Can we harm future people? // Environmental politics. - L., 2001. - Vol. 10. - P. 429-454.
8. De Geus M. The end of overconsumption: Towards a lifestyle of moderation and self-restraint. - Utrecht: International books, 2003. - 224 p.
9. De-Shalit A. The environment between theory and practice. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2000. - 238 p.
10. Devall B., Sessions G. Deep ecology: Living as if nature mattered. - Layton: Gibbs M. Smith, 1985. - 267 p.
11. DiZerega G. Deep ecology and liberalism // Review of politics. - Notre Dame (IN), 1996. - Vol. 58. - P. 699-734.
12. Dobson A.N.H. Justice and the environment. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1998. - 280 p.
13. Dobson A.N.H. Foreword // Sustaining liberal democracy / Ed. by J. Barry, M. Wissenburg. - Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001. - 243 p.
14. Dobson A.N.H. Citizenship and the environment. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2003. - 238 p.
15. Dryzek R. Discursive democracy: Politics, policy, and political science. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1990. - 254 p.
16. Eckersley R. Environmentalism and political theory. - L.: Univ. college of London press, 1992. - 284 p.
17. Garner R. Animals, politics and justice: Rawlsian liberalism and the plight of non-humans // Environmental politics. - L., 2003. - N 12. - P. 3-22.
18. Hailwood S. How to be a green liberal. - Chesham: Acumen, 2004. - 197 p.
19. Holmes S. The anatomy of anti-liberalism. - Cambridge (MA): Harvard univ. press, 1993. - 330 p.
20. Kyllonen S., Laakso M. Environmental challenges for liberalism: The case of climate change // International j. of politics and ethics. - Huntington, N.Y., 2001. - Vol. 1. - P. 365-77.
21. Mill J.S. On liberty and other essays. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1998. - 632 p.
22. Mill J.S. Principles of political economy. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1999. - 450 p.
23. Murray I. The really inconvenient truths. - Wash.: Regnery press, 2008. - 354 p.
24. Naess A. Ecology, community, and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1989. - 240 p.
25. Norton B. Toward unity among environmentalists. - N.Y.; Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1991. - 286 p.
26. Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. - N.Y.: Basic books, 1974. - 367 p.
27. Nussbaum M. Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. - Harvard: Belknap press, 2006. - 512 p.
28. Oksanen M. Environmental ethics and concepts of private ownership / Environmental ethics and the global marketplace / Ed. by D. Dallmeyer, A. Ike. - Athens: Univ. of Georgia press, 1998. - P. 114-39.
29. Ophuls W. Ecology and the politics of scarcity. - San Francisco: Freeman, 1976. - 303 p.
30. Rawls J. A theory of justice. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1972. - 607 p.
31. Rawls J. Political liberalism. - N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 1993. - xxxiv, 401 p.
32. Sagoff M. Can environmentalists be liberals? // Sagoff M. The economy of the Earth. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1988. - P. 146-70.
33. Schlosberg D. Defining environmental justice. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2007. - 236 p.
34. Schlosberg D. Environmental justice and the new pluralism. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1999. - 238 p.
35. Singer B. An extension of Rawls' theory of justice to environmental ethics // Environmental ethics. - Albuquerque (N.M.), 1988. - N 10. - P. 217-31.
36. Smith G. Deliberative democracy and the environment. - L.: Routledge, 2003. - 258 p.
37. Stephens P. Picking at the locke of economic reductionism // Environmental futures / Ed. by N. Fairweather, S. Elsworthy, M. Stroh, P. Stephens. - L.: Macmillan, 1999. - P. 3-23.
38. Vallentyne P. Libertarianism and the state // Social philosophy & policy. - Cambridge, 2007. - Vol. 24. - P. 187-205.
39. VanDeVeer D. Interspecific justice // Inquiry. - L., 1979. - Vol. 22. - P. 55-79.
40. Wallack M. The minimum irreversible harm principle // Liberal democracy and environmentalism / Ed. by M. Wissenburg, Y. Levy. - L.: Routledge, 2004. - P. 167-178.
41. Weale A. The new politics of pollution. - Manchester: Manchester univ. press, 1992. - 227 p.
42. Wenz P. Environmental justice. - Albany: State univ. of New York press, 1988. - 368 p.
43. Wissenburg M. Green liberalism. - L.: Univ. college of London press, 1998. - 256 p.
44. Wissenburg M. Little green lies // Liberal democracy and environmentalism / Ed. by M. Wissenburg, Y. Levy. - L.: Routledge, 2004. - P. 60-71.
Review
Views:
142
Email this article 
Post a Comment 