The concept of veto players: A new approach to the study of forms of government
Abstract
The article presents the main ideas of the of G. Tsebelis' veto-players theory. The author examines key terms used in this concept, principles and methods of definition of the veto players, the results of their interaction and influence on the political system. In addition, the author analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the concept, prospects of its further application in Russia.
References
1. Зазнаев О.И. Индексный анализ полупрезидентских государств Европы и постсоветского пространства // Полис. - М., 2007. - № 2. - С. 146-164.
2. Curini L., Zucchini F. Testing the law-making theories in a parliamentary democracy: a roll call analysis of the Italian Chamber of Deputies, (1988-2008) // Reform processes and policy change: Veto players and decision-making in modern democracies. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2010. - P. 189-203.
3. Ganghof S., Bräuninger, T. Government status and legislative behaviour: Partisan veto players in Australia, Denmark, Finland and Germany // Party politics. - L., 2006. - N 12. - P. 521-539.
4. Hug S., Tsebelis G. Veto players and referendums around the world // Journal of theoretical politics. - Thousand Oaks, 2002. - Vol. 14, N 4 - P. 466-486.
5. König T., Tsebelis G., Debus M. Reform processes and policy change: veto players and decision-making in modern democracies / T. König (ed.). - N.Y.: Springer Science+ Business Media, 2010. - 283 p.
6. König T. Bicameralism and party politics in Germany: an empirical social choice analysis // Political studies. - Oxford, 2001. - N 49. - P. 411-437.
7. Konig T., Troger V. Budgetary politics and veto players // Swiss political science review. - Zuerich, 2005. - N 11. - P. 47-75.
8. Merkel W. Institutions and reform policy: Three case studies on the veto player theory // Working papers. - Madrid: Huan March Institute, 2003. - Mode of access: http://www.exu.sk/material/temac/merkel/veto_player_paper_done.doc (Дата посещения: 15.08.2013.)
9. Rowley C.K., Schneider F. Readings in public choice and constitutional political economy. - N.Y.: Springer Science+Business Media, 2008. - 625 p.
10. The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 1. - 441 p.
11. The encyclopedia of public choice / C.K. Rowley, F. Schneider (eds). - Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004. - Vol. 2. - 664 p.
12. Tsebelis G. Decision making in political systems: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism, and multipartyism // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 1995. - N 25. - P. 289-326.
13. Tsebelis G. Nested games: rational choice in a comparative perspective. - Berkeley: Univ. of California press, 1990. - 288 p.
14. Tsebelis G. Veto players and institutional analysis // Governance: an international journal of policy and administration. - Los Angeles, 2000. - Vol. 13, N 4. - P. 441-474.
15. Tsebelis G. Veto players and law production in parliamentary democracies: an empirical analysis // American political science review. - Cambridge, 1999. - N 93. - P. 591-608.
16. Tsebelis G., Garrett G. Agenda setting power, power indices, and decision making in the European Union // International review of law and economics. - N.Y., 1996. - Vol. 3, N 16. - P. 345-361.
17. Tsebelis G., Rizova T. Presidential conditional agenda setting in the former communist countries // Comparative political studies. - Seattle, 2007. - Vol. 40, N 10. - P. 1155-1182.
18. Volcansek M.L. Constitutional courts as veto players: Divorce and decrees in Italy // European journal of political research. - Dordrecht, 2001. - N 39. - P. 347-372.
Review
Views:
108
Email this article 
Post a Comment 