Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Online memory of the Soviet past: social networks as alternative arenas for debates about USSR

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.01.08

Abstract

Thе article considers how social networks produce an online memory of the Soviet past. Social networks are described as arenas that are open and accessible to many actors. These actors operate in a freer discursive field, not limited in their activity by dominant narratives about the past. It has been noted that social media can be used by citizens as a means of discussing the shared past and can act as a counter to elite discourse.
In order to understand how the discussion of the Soviet past is structured in social media, a qualitative content analysis of three online group records and comments on them was conducted. The goal was to examine the main themes and arguments, as well as the characteristics of the discussion that emerged. Three popular social networks in Russia were chosen: Vkontakte, Instagram and Facebook. Three records with the most generalizing topic, devoted to the Soviet past, were selected.
It was shown that during the process of constructing new meanings and creating interpretations, the actors of online memory rely both on the official discourse of the political elite about the Soviet past and the Russian present and on their subjective biographies and personal experiences. At the same time, social networks provide opportunities for the creation of alternative and counternarratives. The conclusion is made about the «absorptive» properties of the memory of the Soviet past, since actors are able to build into it any current events, including the Covid-19 pandemic. 

About the Author

A. Yu. Dolgov
Institute of scientific information for social sciences of the Russian academy of sciences; National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Moscow



References

1. Birkner T., Donk A. Collective memory and social media: Fostering a new historical consciousness in the digital age? Memory studies. 2020, Vol. 13, N 4, P. 367–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017750012

2. Dergacheva D., Tous-Rovirosa A. Government’s echo. Twitter discussions around news topics in Russian networked authoritarianism. Russian journal of communication. 2021, Vol. 13, N 2, P. 117–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19409419.2021.1874790

3. Khlevnyuk D. Narrowcasting collective memory online: “liking” Stalin in Russian social media. Media, culture & Society. 2019, Vol. 41, N 3, P. 317–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718799401

4. Krawatzek F. Which history matters? Surveying Russian youth and their understandings of the past. Problems of post-communism. 2021, Vol. 68, N 5, P. 402–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2020.1753081

5. Litvinenko A., Zavadski A. Memories on demand: Narratives about 1917 in Russia’s online publics. Europe-Asia studies. 2020, Vol. 72, N 10, P. 1657–1677. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2020.1791801

6. Liu J. Who speaks for the past? Social media, social memory, and the production of historical knowledge in contemporary China. International journal of communication. 2018, Vol. 12, P. 1675–1695.

7. Malinova O. Yu. Who forms official historical narrative and how? (Analysis of Russian practices). The journal of political theory, political philosophy and sociology of politics Politeia. 2019, N 3, P. 103–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2019-94-3-103-126 (In Russ.)

8. Pušnik M. Media memorial discourses and memory struggles in Slovenia: Transforming memories of the Second World War and Yugoslavia. Memory studies. 2019, Vol. 12, N 4, P. 433–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698017720254

9. Wessler H. Deliberativeness in political communication. In: W. Donsbach (ed.). The concise encyclopedia of communication. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015, P. 139–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118789353.ch4


Review

Views: 138


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)