When n = 1: The problem of the European Union «uniqueness» in a modern comparative studies
Abstract
The article discusses methodological solutions to the “n = 1” problem, otherwise known as a sui generis problem in the study of the EU that seemingly leads to inability to conduct comparative research. Yet, engagement of the EU scholars both with comparative politics and new regionalism has produced a surge in number of articles based on comparative method. Research investigation into four academic journals shows that this trend is distinctive of English-language journals but not of the Russian ones.
About the Authors
A. . Decalchuk
НИУ ВШЭ - СПб
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
A. . Hohlova
НИУ ВШЭ - СПб; Тартуский университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Кондратьева Н.Б. Таможенный союз ЕврАзЭС движется по стопам ЕС // Актуальные проблемы Европы. - М., 2011. - № 2. - С. 164-187.
2. Романова Т.А. Методология оценки политической эволюции Европейского союза // Политическая Экспертиза: ПОЛИТЭКС. - СПб., 2013. - Т. 9, № 2. - С. 80-100.
3. Телегина И.П. Калининградская область. Есть ли прорыв в проблеме транзита? // Современная Европа. - М., 2007. - № 3(31). - С. 123-132.
4. Экспертная оценка российских научных журналов по версии НИУ ВШЭ // Полит.ру. - Режим доступа: http://polit.ru/article/2015/04/08/list_journals/ (Дата посещения: 30.08.2015.)
5. Caporaso J.A. Does the European Union represent an n of 1? // ECSA review. -Pittsburgh, 1997. - Vol. 10, N 3. - P. 1-2.
6. Chryssochoou D.N. Democracy and symbiosis in the European Union: Towards a confederal consociation // West European politics. - L., 1994. - Vol. 17, N 4. - P. 1-14.
7. Costello R., Thomson R. The policy impact of leadership in committees: Rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament’s opinions // European Union politics. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010. - Vol. 11, N 2. - P. 219-240.
8. Franchino F. The study of European public policy // European Union politics. - Thousand Oaks, 2005. - Vol. 6, N 2. - P. 243-252.
9. Geddes B. Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research Design in comparative politics. - Ann Arbor, MI: Univ. of Michigan press, 2003. - 314 p.
10. Genna G.M., Lombaerde P.D. The small N methodological challenges of analyzing Regional integration // Journal of European integration. - L., 2010. - Vol. 32, N 6. - P. 583-595.
11. Haas E.B. The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950-1957. - Redwood City, CA: Stanford univ press, 1958. - 580 p.
12. Hix S. The study of the European Community: The Challenge to comparative politics // West European politics. - L., 1994. - Vol. 17, N 1. - P. 1-30.
13. Hix S. The study of the European Union II: the ‘New governance’ agenda and its rival // Journal of European public policy. - L., 1998. - Vol. 5, N 1. - P. 38-65.
14. Hix S., Hoyland B. The political system of the European Union. - 3-rd ed. - L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. - 400 p.
15. Hoffmann S. Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe // Daedalus. - Cambridge, MA., 1966. - Vol. 95, N 3. - P. 862-915.
16. Hooghe L. Letter from the Chair: Methodological Pluralism among Europeanists // Newsletter of the European politics & society section of the APSA. - Washington, DC., 2005. - Vol. 4, N 2. - P. 1-23.
17. Hoyland B. Allocation of codecision reports in the Fifth European Parliament // European Union Politics. - Thousand Oaks, CA., 2006. - Vol. 7, N 1. - P. 30-50.
18. Jachtenfuchs M. The governance approach to European integration // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2001. - Vol. 39, N 2. - P. 245-264.
19. Jupille J. Knowing Europe: metatheory and methodology in European Union studies // Palgrave advances in European Union studies / Ed. by M. Cini, A.K. Bourne. - L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005. - P. 209-232.
20. Jupille J., Caporaso J.A., Checkel J.T. Integrating institutions: rationalism, constructivism, and the Study of the European Union // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2003. - Vol. 36, N 1-2. - P. 7-40.
21. Keeler J.T. Mapping EU studies: The Evolution from Boutique to boom field 1960-2001 // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2005. - Vol. 43, N 3. - P. 551-582.
22. King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S. Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. - Princeton, NJ: Princeton univ. press, 1994. - 261 p.
23. Kreppel A. The normalization of the European Union // Journal of European public policy. - L., 2012. - Vol. 19, N 5. - P. 635-645.
24. Libman A., Vinokurov E. Regional integration and economic convergence in the post-soviet space: experience of the decade of growth // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2012. - Vol. 50, N 1. - P. 112-128.
25. Lijphart A. Comparative politics and the comparative method // American political science review. - Cambridge, MA, 1971. - Vol. 65, N 3. - P. 682-693.
26. Marks G. Does the European Union represent an n of 1? // ECSA review. - Pittsburgh, NJ, 1997. - Vol. 10, N 3. - P. 2-3.
27. Moravcsik A. Does the European Union represent an n of 1? // ECSA review. -Pittsburgh, MA, 1997. - Vol. 10, N 3. - P. 3-4.
28. Moravcsik A. Preferences and power in the european community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 1993. - Vol. 31, N 4. - P. 473-524.
29. Phelan W. Enforcement and escape in the andean community: Why the andean community of nations is not a replica of the European Union // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2015. - Vol. 53, N 4. - P. 840-856.
30. Pollack M.A. Does the European Union represent an n of 1? // ECSA review. -Pittsburgh, MA, 1997. - Vol. 10, N 3. - P. 4-5.
31. Pollack M.A. Theorizing the European Union: international organization, domestic polity, or experiment in new governance? // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, CA, 2005. - Vol. 8, N 1. - P. 357-398.
32. Sartori G. Concept Misformation in comparative politics // American political science review. - Cambridge, MA, 1970. - Vol. 64, N 4. - P. 1033-1053.
33. Sbragia A.M. The EU in comparative perspective: The US as referent? // EUSA review. - Pittsburgh, MA, 2007. - Vol. 20, N 2. - P. 7-9.
34. Steinbach A. The Mutualization of sovereign debt: comparing the american past and the european present // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2015. - Vol. 53, N 5. - P. 1110-1125.
35. Tortola P.D. The limits of normalization: Taking stock of the EU-US comparative literature // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2014. - Vol. 52, N 6. - P. 1342-1357.
36. Verdun A. What is science in European Union studies? // EUSA review. - Pittsburgh, MA, 2007. - Vol. 20, N 2. - P. 1-3.
37. Warleigh-Lack A., Rosamond B. Across the EU studies-new regionalism Frontier: invitation to a dialogue // Journal of common market studies. - Hoboken, NJ, 2010. - Vol. 48, N 4. - P. 993-1013.
38. Warleigh-Lack A., Van Langenhove L. Rethinking EU studies: The contribution of comparative regionalism // Journal of European integration. - L., 2010. - Vol. 32, N 6. - P. 541-562.
Review
Views:
97
Email this article 
Post a Comment 