Preview

Политическая наука

Расширенный поиск

Современные подходы к анализу политического дискурса

Аннотация

В статье рассматриваются пять современных подходов к анализу политического дискурса: критический дискурс-анализ, постструктуралистский дискурс-анализ, культуральная политэкономия, культурный и дескриптивный подходы. Сравнительная характеристика осуществляется по двум критериям: трактовка понятия дискурс и методологическая составляющая. Особое внимание уделяется точкам пересечения подходов. В заключении суммируются преимущества и недостатки каждого из них.

Об авторе

Анастасия Олеговна Ионова
НИУ ВШЭ
Россия


Список литературы

1. Будаев Э.В., Чудинов А.П. Методологические грани политической метафорологии // Политическая лингвистика. - Екатеринбург, 2007. - № 21. - С. 22-31.

2. Ильин М.В. Политический дискурс как предмет анализа // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2002. - № 3. - С. 4-20.

3. Кравченко С.А. Культуральная социология Дж. Александера (генезис, понятия, возможности, инструментарий) // Социологические исследования. - М., 2010. - № 5. - С. 13-22.

4. Семенова А.В., Корсунская М.В. Контент-анализ СМИ: Проблемы и опыт применения - М.: Изд-во Института социологии РАН, 2010. - 324 с.

5. Фомин И.В. Политические исследования в трансдисциплинарной перспективе: возможности семиотического инструментария // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2015. - № 2. - С. 8-25.

6. Bacchi C. Why study problematizations? Making politics visible // Open journal of political science. - Irvine, CA, 2012. -Vol. 2, N 1. - P. 1-8.

7. Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research. - N.Y.: The Free Press - 1952. - p. 220.

8. Cao Q. The language of soft power: Mediating socio-political meanings in the Chinese media // Critical arts: South-north cultural and media studies. - L., 2011. - Vol. 25, N 1. - P. 7-24.

9. Cao Q., Renwick N. China's political discourse towards the 21 st century victimhood, identity, and political power // East Asia: An international quarterly. - Dordrecht, 1999. - Vol. 17, N 4. - P. 111-143.

10. Chilton P. Language, cognition, and space: the state of the art and new directions. - L.: Equinox - 519 p.

11. Collier M.J. Transforming communication about culture: Critical new directions. - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2001. - 320 p.

12. Dijk T. van. Discourse as structure and process. - L.: Sage, 1997. - 356 p.

13. Fairclough I., Fairclough N. Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. - L.: Routledge, 2012. - 270 p.

14. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2013. - Vol. 7, N 2. - P. 177-197.

15. Fischer F. Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: integrating empirical and normative arguments // Handbook of public policy analysis / F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (eds). - L.; N.Y.: CRC Press, 2007. - P. 223-236.

16. Fischer F., Forester J. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. - Durham: Duke univ. press, 1993. - 352 p.

17. Fischer F., Gottweis H. The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: Twenty years later // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2013. - Vol. 7, N 4. - P. 425-433.

18. Gottweis H. Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: Towards an analytic of government // Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society / M.Hajer, H. Wagenaar - Cambridge; N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. - P. 247-249.

19. Hailong T. Discourse and public sphere in China: A study of the Wu Ying lawsuit case // Contemporary Chinese discourse and social practice in China / L. Tsung, W. Wang (eds). - Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015. - P. 27-44.

20. Howarth D. Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2010. - Vol. 3, N 3-4. - P. 309-335.

21. Howarth D. and Griggs S. Poststructuralist policy analysis: Discourse, hegemony and critical explanation // The argumentative turn revisited: public policy as communicative practiceeds / F. Fischer, H. Gottweis (eds). - Durham; L.: Duke univ. press, 2012. - P. 305-342.

22. Jessop B. Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy // Critical discourse studies. - Abingdon, Oxfordshire, 2004. - Vol. 2, N 1. - P. 159-174.

23. Jessop B. Cultural political economy and critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2009. - Vol. 3-4, N 3. - P. 336-356.

24. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. - L.: Verso, 2001. - 197 p.

25. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. - L.: Univ. of Chicago press, 2003. - 256 p.

26. Lakoff R.T. The nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis // The handbook of discourse analysis / D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton (eds). - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. - P. 199-215.

27. Marinelli M. Jiang Zemin’s discourse on intellectuals: The political use of formalised language and the conundrum of stability // Journal of current Chinese affairs. - Hamburg, 2013 - Vol. 42, N 2. - P. 111-140.

28. Martin J., Nakayama T.K. Intercultural communication in contexts. - Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Pub. Co., 2000. - 364 p.

29. Martinez D.F. From theory to method: A methodological approach within critical discourse analysis // Critical discourse studies. - Abingdon, Oxfordshire, 2007. - Vol. 2, N 4. - P. 125-140.

30. Nakayama T. K., Halualani R.T. The Handbook of critical intercultural communication. - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. - 648 p.

31. Potter J. Re-reading discourse and social psychology: Transforming social psychology // British journal of social psychology. - Leicester, 2012. - N 51. - P. 436-455.

32. Sayer A. Realism and social science. - L.: Sage, 2000. - 211 p.

33. Saussure F., de. Course in general linguistics. - N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 2011. - 336 p.

34. Shi-xu. Reconstructing eastern paradigms of discourse studies // Journal of multicultural discourses. - Clevedon, UK, 2009. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 29-48.

35. Shi-xu. Understanding contemporary Chinese political communication: A historic-intercultural analysis and assessment of its discourse of human rights // Journal of language and politics. - Amsterdam, 2012 a. - Vol. 11, N 1. - P. 93-114.

36. Shi-xu. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses // Critical arts: A south-north journal of culture and media studies. - L., 2012 b. - Vol. 26, N 4. - P. 484-503.

37. Shi-xu. Chinese Discourse Studies - New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. - 223 p.

38. Shi-xu. Cultural Discourse Studies // The international encyclopedia of languages and social interaction / K. Tracy (ed.). - 2015. - Mode of access: http://www. shixu.com/shixu/admin/upload/ency%20CDS.pdf (Дата посещения: 14.06.2016.)

39. Small T.A. What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter // Information, communication & society. - L., 2011. - Vol. 14, N 6. - P. 872-895.

40. Sum N.-L. Stuggles against wal-martization and neo-liberal competitiveness in (southern) China: Is post-neoliberalism an alternative? // Development dialogue. - Uppsala, 2008. - N 51. - P. 67-81.

41. Sum N.-L. The production of hegemonic policy discourses: ‘competitiveness’ as a knowledge brand and its (re)contextualizations // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2009. - Vol. 3, N 2. - P. 184-203.

42. Wetherell M. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue // Discourse and society. - L., 1998. - N 9. - P. 387-412.

43. Methods of critical discourse analysis / R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds). - L.: Sage, 2001. - 200 p.

44. Methods of critical discourse studies / R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds). - L.; N.Y.: Sage, 2015. - 272 p.

45. Wodak R. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis // Discursive pragmatics / J. Zienkowski, J. Östman, J. Verschueren (eds). - Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011. - P. 50-70.


Рецензия

Просмотров: 105


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)