Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Contemporary approaches to the analysis of political discourse

Abstract

The article examines five modern approaches to discourse analysis: critical discourse analysis, poststructuralist discourse analysis, cultural political economy, cultural discourse studies and descriptive methods. Comparative analysis is carried out on two criteria: the definition of the notion of discourse and methodological frameworks. It touches upon the problem of intersection between approaches and summarizes advantages and disadvantages of each of them.

About the Author

Anastasia Ionova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Будаев Э.В., Чудинов А.П. Методологические грани политической метафорологии // Политическая лингвистика. - Екатеринбург, 2007. - № 21. - С. 22-31.

2. Ильин М.В. Политический дискурс как предмет анализа // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2002. - № 3. - С. 4-20.

3. Кравченко С.А. Культуральная социология Дж. Александера (генезис, понятия, возможности, инструментарий) // Социологические исследования. - М., 2010. - № 5. - С. 13-22.

4. Семенова А.В., Корсунская М.В. Контент-анализ СМИ: Проблемы и опыт применения - М.: Изд-во Института социологии РАН, 2010. - 324 с.

5. Фомин И.В. Политические исследования в трансдисциплинарной перспективе: возможности семиотического инструментария // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2015. - № 2. - С. 8-25.

6. Bacchi C. Why study problematizations? Making politics visible // Open journal of political science. - Irvine, CA, 2012. -Vol. 2, N 1. - P. 1-8.

7. Berelson B. Content analysis in communication research. - N.Y.: The Free Press - 1952. - p. 220.

8. Cao Q. The language of soft power: Mediating socio-political meanings in the Chinese media // Critical arts: South-north cultural and media studies. - L., 2011. - Vol. 25, N 1. - P. 7-24.

9. Cao Q., Renwick N. China's political discourse towards the 21 st century victimhood, identity, and political power // East Asia: An international quarterly. - Dordrecht, 1999. - Vol. 17, N 4. - P. 111-143.

10. Chilton P. Language, cognition, and space: the state of the art and new directions. - L.: Equinox - 519 p.

11. Collier M.J. Transforming communication about culture: Critical new directions. - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2001. - 320 p.

12. Dijk T. van. Discourse as structure and process. - L.: Sage, 1997. - 356 p.

13. Fairclough I., Fairclough N. Political discourse analysis: A method for advanced students. - L.: Routledge, 2012. - 270 p.

14. Fairclough N. Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2013. - Vol. 7, N 2. - P. 177-197.

15. Fischer F. Deliberative policy analysis as practical reason: integrating empirical and normative arguments // Handbook of public policy analysis / F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (eds). - L.; N.Y.: CRC Press, 2007. - P. 223-236.

16. Fischer F., Forester J. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. - Durham: Duke univ. press, 1993. - 352 p.

17. Fischer F., Gottweis H. The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: Twenty years later // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2013. - Vol. 7, N 4. - P. 425-433.

18. Gottweis H. Theoretical strategies of poststructuralist policy analysis: Towards an analytic of government // Deliberative policy analysis. Understanding governance in the network society / M.Hajer, H. Wagenaar - Cambridge; N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. - P. 247-249.

19. Hailong T. Discourse and public sphere in China: A study of the Wu Ying lawsuit case // Contemporary Chinese discourse and social practice in China / L. Tsung, W. Wang (eds). - Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015. - P. 27-44.

20. Howarth D. Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2010. - Vol. 3, N 3-4. - P. 309-335.

21. Howarth D. and Griggs S. Poststructuralist policy analysis: Discourse, hegemony and critical explanation // The argumentative turn revisited: public policy as communicative practiceeds / F. Fischer, H. Gottweis (eds). - Durham; L.: Duke univ. press, 2012. - P. 305-342.

22. Jessop B. Critical semiotic analysis and cultural political economy // Critical discourse studies. - Abingdon, Oxfordshire, 2004. - Vol. 2, N 1. - P. 159-174.

23. Jessop B. Cultural political economy and critical policy studies // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2009. - Vol. 3-4, N 3. - P. 336-356.

24. Laclau E., Mouffe C. Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. - L.: Verso, 2001. - 197 p.

25. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. - L.: Univ. of Chicago press, 2003. - 256 p.

26. Lakoff R.T. The nine ways of looking at apologies: The necessity for interdisciplinary theory and method in discourse analysis // The handbook of discourse analysis / D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton (eds). - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers, 2001. - P. 199-215.

27. Marinelli M. Jiang Zemin’s discourse on intellectuals: The political use of formalised language and the conundrum of stability // Journal of current Chinese affairs. - Hamburg, 2013 - Vol. 42, N 2. - P. 111-140.

28. Martin J., Nakayama T.K. Intercultural communication in contexts. - Mountain View, Calif.: Mayfield Pub. Co., 2000. - 364 p.

29. Martinez D.F. From theory to method: A methodological approach within critical discourse analysis // Critical discourse studies. - Abingdon, Oxfordshire, 2007. - Vol. 2, N 4. - P. 125-140.

30. Nakayama T. K., Halualani R.T. The Handbook of critical intercultural communication. - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. - 648 p.

31. Potter J. Re-reading discourse and social psychology: Transforming social psychology // British journal of social psychology. - Leicester, 2012. - N 51. - P. 436-455.

32. Sayer A. Realism and social science. - L.: Sage, 2000. - 211 p.

33. Saussure F., de. Course in general linguistics. - N.Y.: Columbia univ. press, 2011. - 336 p.

34. Shi-xu. Reconstructing eastern paradigms of discourse studies // Journal of multicultural discourses. - Clevedon, UK, 2009. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 29-48.

35. Shi-xu. Understanding contemporary Chinese political communication: A historic-intercultural analysis and assessment of its discourse of human rights // Journal of language and politics. - Amsterdam, 2012 a. - Vol. 11, N 1. - P. 93-114.

36. Shi-xu. Why do cultural discourse studies? Towards a culturally conscious and critical approach to human discourses // Critical arts: A south-north journal of culture and media studies. - L., 2012 b. - Vol. 26, N 4. - P. 484-503.

37. Shi-xu. Chinese Discourse Studies - New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. - 223 p.

38. Shi-xu. Cultural Discourse Studies // The international encyclopedia of languages and social interaction / K. Tracy (ed.). - 2015. - Mode of access: http://www. shixu.com/shixu/admin/upload/ency%20CDS.pdf (Дата посещения: 14.06.2016.)

39. Small T.A. What the hashtag? A content analysis of Canadian politics on Twitter // Information, communication & society. - L., 2011. - Vol. 14, N 6. - P. 872-895.

40. Sum N.-L. Stuggles against wal-martization and neo-liberal competitiveness in (southern) China: Is post-neoliberalism an alternative? // Development dialogue. - Uppsala, 2008. - N 51. - P. 67-81.

41. Sum N.-L. The production of hegemonic policy discourses: ‘competitiveness’ as a knowledge brand and its (re)contextualizations // Critical policy studies. - Vancouver, 2009. - Vol. 3, N 2. - P. 184-203.

42. Wetherell M. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and poststructuralism in dialogue // Discourse and society. - L., 1998. - N 9. - P. 387-412.

43. Methods of critical discourse analysis / R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds). - L.: Sage, 2001. - 200 p.

44. Methods of critical discourse studies / R. Wodak, M. Meyer (eds). - L.; N.Y.: Sage, 2015. - 272 p.

45. Wodak R. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis // Discursive pragmatics / J. Zienkowski, J. Östman, J. Verschueren (eds). - Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2011. - P. 50-70.


Review

Views: 112


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)