«Демократический Левиафан»? Режимные изменения и государственная состоятельность - проблема взаимосвязи
Аннотация
В данной статье рассматривается явление государственной состоятельности и различные подходы к его концептуализации, использовавшиеся исследователями на протяжении последних десятилетий, различные способы измерения этого концепта, а также весь спектр существующих теорий о взаимосвязи государственной состоятельности с динамикой режимных трансформаций. В эмпирической части работы авторы кластеризуют траектории изменения характеристик государственной состоятельности и политического режима в большинстве государств мира за 1992-2011 гг., после чего сопоставляют траектории между собой и формулируют выводы о подтверждении или опровержении тех или иных гипотез о взаимосвязи политического режима и госсостоятельности. В частности, находят довольно много опровержений гипотезы о примате государственной состоятельности над демократизацией и о невозможности успешного развития состоятельности при жестком автократическом режиме. Вместе с тем гипотеза о возможности параллельного развития демократии и государственной состоятельности, скорее, находит свое подтверждение.
Список литературы
1. Ильин М.В. Суверенитет: Вызревание понятийной категории в условиях глобализации // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2005. - № 4. - С. 10-28.
2. Мелешкина Е.Ю. Исследования государственной состоятельности: Какие уроки мы можем извлечь? // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2011. - № 2. - С. 9-27.
3. Мельвиль А.Ю., Миронюк М.Г., Стукал Д.К. Государственная состоятельность, демократия и демократизация (На примере посткоммунистических стран) // Политическая наука / РАН. ИНИОН. - М., 2012. - № 4. - С. 83-105.
4. Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. Траектории режимных трансформаций и типы государственной состоятельности // Полис: Политические исследования. - М., 2012. - № 2. - С. 8-30.
5. Мельвиль А.Ю., Стукал Д.К., Миронюк М.Г. «Царь горы», или Почему в посткоммунистических автократиях плохие институты // Полис: Политические исследования. - М., 2013. - № 2. - С. 125-142.
6. Политический атлас современности: Опыт многомерного статистического анализа политических систем современных государств / А.Ю. Мельвиль, М.В. Ильин, Е.Ю. Мелешкина, М.Г. Миронюк, Ю.А. Полунин, Н.И. Тимофеев. - М.: Изд-во «МГИМО-Университет», 2007. - 272 с.
7. Adizes I. The ideal executive: Why you cannot be one and what to do about it: A new paradigm for management. - Santa Barbara, CA, 2004. - Mode of access: http://www.adizes.com/wp-content/uploads/The_Ideal_Executive_Sample_CH.pdf (Дата посещения: 25.07.2016).
8. Bäck H., Hadenius A. Democracy and state capacity: Exploring a J-shaped relationship // Governance. - L., 2008. - Vol. 21, N 1. - P. 1-24.
9. Berman S. The Vain hope for «correct» timing // Journal of Democracy. - Baltimore, 2007. - Vol. 18, N 3. - P. 14-17.
10. Besley T.J., Kudamatsu M. Making Autocracy Work // Institutions and economic performance / E. Helpman (ed.). - Harvard: Harvard univ. press, 2009. - P. 452-510.
11. Besley T., Persson T. State capacity, conflict, and development // Econometrica. - N.Y., 2010. - Vol. 78, N 1. - P. 1-34.
12. Besley T., Persson T. The origins of state capacity: Property rights, taxation, and politics // The American economic review. - Pittsburgh, 2009. - Vol. 99, N 4. - P. 1218-1244.
13. Boix C., Svolik M.W. The foundations of limited authoritarian government: Institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships // The Journal of Politics. - Chicago, 2013. - Vol. 75, N 2. - P. 300-316.
14. Bolt J., Zanden J.L. The Maddison project: Collaborative research on historical national accounts // The Economic history review. - Glasgow, 2014. - Vol. 67, N 3. - P. 627-651.
15. Bratton M., Chang E.C. C. State building and democratization in sub-saharan Africa forwards, backwards, or together? // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, 2006. - Vol. 39, N 9. - P. 1059-1083.
16. Carbone G., Memoli V. Does democratization foster state consolidation? A panel analysis of the ‘Backward Hypothesis’: Unpublished paper - 2012. - Mode of access: http://www.sociol.unimi.it/papers/2012-04-19_G.%20Carbone%20e%20V.%20Memoli.pdf (Дата посещения: 08.08.2016.)
17. Cárdenas M. State capacity in Latin America // Economía. - Washington, 2010. - Vol. 10, N 2. - P. 1-45.
18. Charron N., Lapuente V. Does democracy produce quality of government? // European journal of political research. - Hoboken, 2010. - Vol. 49, N 4. - P. 443-470.
19. Cingranelli D.L., Richards D.L. The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) human rights data project // Human rights quarterly. - Baltimore, 2010. - Vol. 32, N 2. - P. 401-424.
20. Clague C. Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies // Journal of economic growth. - Berlin, 1996. - Vol. 1, N 2. - P. 243-276.
21. D’Arcy M., Nistotskaya M. State first, then democracy: Using cadastral records to explain governmental performance in public goods provision. - Gothenburg, 2015. - Vol. 2015, N 11. - 30 p. (QoG Working Paper Series.)
22. Data // The quality of government institute. - 2015. - Mode of access: http://qog.pol.gu.se/ data (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
23. Edin M. State capacity and local agent control in china: CCP cadre management from a township perspective // The China Quarterly. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. - Vol. 173. - P. 35-52.
24. Evans P.B., Rueschemeyer D., Skocpol T. Bringing the state back in. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1985. - 404 p.
25. Feenstra R.C., Inklaar R., Timmer M.P. The next generation of the penn world table // The American economic review. - Pittsburgh, 2015. - Vol. 105, N 10. - P. 3150-3182.
26. Fjelde H., De Soysa I. Coercion, co-optation, or cooperation? State capacity and the risk of civil war, 1961-2004 // Conflict management and peace science. - Thousand Oaks, 2009. - Vol. 26, N 1. - P. 5-25.
27. Fortin J. A tool to evaluate state capacity in post-communist countries, 1989-2006 // European journal of political research. - Hoboken, 2010. - Vol. 49, N 5. - P. 654-686.
28. Fortin J. Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, 2012. - Vol. 45, N 7. - P. 903-930.
29. Fortin-Rittberger J. Exploring the relationship between infrastructural and coercive state capacity // Democratization. - L.: Taylor & Francis, 2014. - Vol. 21, N 7. - P. 1244-1264.
30. Global country status overview, FIW 1973-2015 // Freedom House. - 2015. - Mode of access: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/Global_Country_Status_Overview_1973-2015.pdf (Дата посещения: 07.08.2016.)
31. Frye T. Building states and markets after communism: the perils of polarized democracy. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. - 314 p.
32. Fukuyama F. Liberalism versus state-building // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2007. - Vol. 18, N 3. - P. 10-13.
33. Fukuyama F. State-building: Governance and world order in the 21 st century. - Ithaka: Cornell univ. press, 2004 a. - 160 p.
34. Fukuyama F. The imperative of state-building // Journal of Democracy. - Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 2004 b. - Vol. 15, N 2. - P. 17-31.
35. Gandhi J., Przeworski A. Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats // Comparative Political Studies. - Thousand Oaks, 2007. - Vol. 40, N 11. - P. 1279-1301.
36. Gehlbach S. Representation through taxation. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2008. - 216 p.
37. Gennaioli N., Voth H.J. State capacity and military conflict // The Review of economic studies. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2015. - Vol. 82, N 4. - P. 1409-1448.
38. Guriev S., Treisman D. How modern dictators survive: an informational theory of the new authoritarianism. - Cambridge: National bureau of economic research, 2015. - N 21136. - 46 p. - (NBER Working Paper).
39. Haber S. Authoritarian government // The Oxford handbook of political economy / B. Weingast, D. Wittman (eds.). - Oxford, 2006. - P. 693-707.
40. Halperlin M.H., Siegle J.T., Weinstein M.M. Why democracies excel // Foreign Affairs. - N.Y., 2004. - Vol. 83, N 5. - P. 57-71.
41. Hanson J.K. Democracy and state capacity: complements or substitutes? // Studies in comparative international development. - Berlin, 2015. - Vol. 50, N 3. - P. 304-330.
42. Hanson J.K., Sigman R. Leviathan's latent dimensions: measuring state capacity for comparative political research // APSA 2013 Annual meeting paper. - 2013. - Mode of access: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jkhanson/resources/hanson_sigman13.pdf (Дата посещения: 01.08.2016.)
43. Hendrix C.S. Measuring state capacity: theoretical and empirical implications for the study of civil conflict // Journal of peace research. - Thousand Oaks, 2010. - Vol. 47, N 3. - P. 273-285.
44. Huntington S.P. Political order in changing societies. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1968. - 512 p.
45. Institutional Profiles Database III // Presentation of the Institutional Profiles Database.-2009. - Mode of access: http://www.cepii.fr/institutions/EN/ipd.asp (Дата посещения: 04.08.2016.)
46. International Country Risk Guide Researchers Dataset // The PRS Group.-2007. - Mode of access: https://www.prsgroup.com/about-us/our-two-methodologies/icrg (Дата посещения: 01.08.2016.)
47. Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: methodology and analytical issues // Hague journal on the rule of law. - Hague, 2011. - Vol. 3, N 2. - P. 220-246.
48. Kjær M., Hansen O.H., Thomsen J.P.F. Conceptualizing state capacity // Democracy, the state and administrative reforms, DEMSTAR report. - Nicosia, 2002. - Mode of access: http://documents.mx/documents/conceptualizingstatecapacity-hensen-e-thomsen.html (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
49. Knutsen C.H., Nygård H.M. Institutional characteristics and regime survival: Why are semi-democracies less durable than autocracies and democracies? // American journal of political science. - Hoboken, 2015. - Vol. 59, N 3. - P. 656-670.
50. Kuthy D. The effect of state capacity on the survival of new democratic regimes // APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. - 2010. - Mode of access: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/
51. papers.cfm?abstract_id=1643525 (Дата посещения: 01.08.2016.)
52. Levitsky S., Way L.A. Competitive authoritarianism: hybrid regimes after the Cold War. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. - 536 p.
53. Linz J.J., Stepan A. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. - Baltimore; L.: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1996. - 504 p.
54. MacLaren M. «Sequentialism» or «gradualism»? On the transition to democracy and the rule of law /WP 38. National Center of Competence in Research: Challenges to Democracy in the 21 st Century. - Bern: Swiss national science foundation, 2009. - Mode of access: http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/publications/workingpaper/pdf/wp38.pdf (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
55. Mann M. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results // European journal of sociology. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 1984. - Vol. 25, N 02. - P. 185-213.
56. Mansfield E.D., Snyder J.L. The sequencing «fallacy» // Journal of democracy. - Baltimore, 2007. - Vol. 18, N 3. - P. 5-10.
57. Marshall M.G. Polity IV project, political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2015 / Center for systemic peace. - 2016 b. - Mode of access: http://www.
58. systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4v2015.xls (Дата посещения: 05.08.2016.)
59. Marshall M.G. Major episodes of political violence (MEPV) and conflict regions, 1946-2015. - 2016 a. - Mode of access: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/ MEPVcodebook2015.pdf (Дата посещения: 06.08.2016.)
60. Mazzuca S.L., Munck G.L. State or democracy first? Alternative perspectives on the state-democracy nexus // Democratization. - L., 2014. - Vol. 21, N 7. - P. 1221-1243.
61. McGuire J.W. Political regime and social performance // Contemporary Politics. - L., 2013. - Vol. 19, N 1. - P. 55-75.
62. Melville A., Stukal D., Mironyuk M. Trajectories of regime transformation and types of stateness in post-communist countries // Perspectives on European politics and society. - L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. - Vol. 14, N 4. - P. 431-459.
63. Migdal J.S. Strong societies and weak states: state-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1988. - 320 p.
64. Møller J., Skaaning S.E. Stateness first? // Democratization. - L., 2011. - Vol. 18, N 1. - P. 1-24.
65. Nettl J.P. The state as a conceptual variable // World politics. - Cambridge, 1968. - Vol. 20, N 4. - P. 559-592.
66. O’Donnell G., Schmitter P.C., Whitehead L. Transitions from authoritarian rule: comparative perspectives. - Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1986. - 208 p.
67. Olson M. Dictatorship, democracy, and development // American political science review. - Cambridge, 1993. - Vol. 87, N 3. - P. 567-576.
68. Ottervik M. Conceptualizing and measuring state capacity. - Gothenburg, 2013. - Vol. 2013, N 20. - 39 p. - (QoG Working Paper Series).
69. Political atlas of the modern world / A. Melville (ed.). - Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2010. - 256 p.
70. Roberts C., Sherlock T. Bringing the russian state back in: explanations of the derailed transition to market democracy // Comparative politics. - N.Y., 1999. - P. 477-498.
71. Roller E. Comparing the performance of autocracies: issues in measuring types of autocratic regimes and performance // Contemporary politics. - L.: Taylor & Francis, 2013. - Vol. 19, N 1. - P. 35-54.
72. Rose R., Shin D. Democratization backwards: the problem of third-wave democracies // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 2001. - Vol. 31, N 2. - P. 331-354.
73. Rotberg R.I. The challenge of weak, failing, and collapsed states // Leashing the dogs of war. - Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 2007. - P. 83-94.
74. Rustow D.A. Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model // Comparative politics. - N.Y., 1970. - Vol. 2, N 3. - P. 337-363.
75. Scheuerman W.E. Postnational democracies without postnational states? Some skeptical reflections // Ethics & Global politics. - Stockholm, 2009. - Vol. 2, N 1. - P. 41-63.
76. Schmitter P., Wagemann C., Obydenkova A. Democratization and state capacity // Paper for X Congresso Internacional del CLAD sobre la Reforma del Estado y de la Administracion Publica. - Santiago, Chile, 2005. - Mode of access: http://unpan1.un.org/ intradoc/groups/public/documents/clad/clad0052201.pdf (Дата посещения: 05.08.2016.)
77. Singer J.D., Bremer S., Stuckey J. Capability distribution, uncertainty, and major power war, 1820-1965 // Peace, war, and numbers / B. Russett (ed.). - Thousand Oaks, 1972. - 352 p.
78. Slater D. Can Leviathan be democratic? Competitive elections, robust mass politics, and state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). - Berlin, 2008. - Vol. 43, N 3-4. - P. 252-272.
79. Soifer H. State infrastructural power: approaches to conceptualization and measurement // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). - Berlin, 2008. - Vol. 43, N 3-4. - P. 231-251.
80. Soifer H., Vom Hau M. Unpacking the strength of the state: the utility of state infrastructural power // Studies in comparative international development (SCID). - Berlin, 2008. - Vol. 43, N 3-4. - P. 219-230.
81. Spruyt H. The sovereign state and its competitors: An analysis of systems change. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1996. - 304 p.
82. Svolik M.W. The politics of authoritarian rule. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2012. - 258 p.
83. Tansey O. Democratization without a state: democratic regime-building in Kosovo // Democratization. - L., 2007. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 129-150.
84. The logic of political survival / B. Bueno de Mesquita, A. Smith, R. Siverson, J. Morrow. - Cambridge; L.: Cambridge univ. press, 2003. - 550 p.
85. The performance of nations / J. Kugler, R.L. Tammen (eds). - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield publishers, 2012. - 348 p.
86. Thies C.G. Of rulers, rebels, and revenue: state capacity, civil war onset, and primary commodities // Journal of peace research. - Thousand Oaks, 2010. - Vol. 47, N 3. - P. 321-332.
87. Thompson W.R., Ganguly S. Ascending India and its state capacity. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 2016. - 352 p.
88. Tilly Ch. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1990. - Cambridge: Basil Blackwell, 1990. - 288 p.
89. Tilly Ch. Democracy. - Cambridge, N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2007. - 248 p.
90. Tilly Ch., Ardant G. The formation of national states in Western Europe. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1975. - 711 p.
91. Transformation index BTI 2016 // Bertelsmann Stiftung. - Mode of access: https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/de/unsere-projekte/transformationsindex-bti/ (Дата посещения: 25.07.2016.)
92. Weede E. Political regime type and variation in economic growth rates // Constitutional political economy. - Dordrecht, 1996. - Vol. 7, N 3. - P. 167-176.
93. Wintrobe R. The tinpot and the totalitarian: an economic theory of dictatorship // American political science review. - Cambridge, 1990. - Vol. 84, N 3. - P. 849-872.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
123
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 