Когда власть несет ответственность за экономический кризис: Исследование атрибуции ответственности власти в сравнительной перспективе
Аннотация
Вопросы политической подотчетности составляют ядро большинства исследований в области качества управления, электоральной и партийной политики и политических бизнес-циклов. До недавнего времени исследователи мало уделяли внимания тому, как именно избиратели приписывают ответственность за последствия проводимых политических курсов. Статья представляет собой обзор исследований механизмов атрибуции ответственности как психологического и политического феномена в сравнительной перспективе и предлагает анализ их применимости к современной российской политической действительности.
Об авторах
Елена Викторовна Сироткина
Научно-исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Россия
Россия
Маргарита Андреевна Завадская
Научно-исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»; Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге (ЕУСПб)
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Андерсон Б. Воображаемые сообщества. - М.: Канон-Пресс-Ц: Кучково поле, 2001. - 288 c.
2. Рогов К. Гипотеза третьего цикла // Pro et Contra. «Россия 2020». - М., 2010. - Т. 14, № 4-5. - С. 6-22.
3. Хантингтон С. Политический порядок в меняющихся обществах. - М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2004. - 480 c.
4. Abney F.G., Hill L.B. Natural disasters as a political variable: The effect of a
5. Acemoglu D., Robinson J.A. Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2006. - 434 p.
6. Achen C.H., Bartels L.M. Blind retrospection. Electoral responses to drought, flu, and shark attacks: Paper delivered at the Center for Advanced Study in the Social Sciences, Juan March Institute, on 7 May 2003. - Princeton, New Jersey. - Mode of access: http://www.ib.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/international-relations-dam/Teaching/pwgrundlagenopenaccess/Weitere/AchenBartels.pdf (Дата посещения: 4.07.2016.)
7. Arceneaux K. The federal face of voting: Are Elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office? // Political psychology. - Malden, 2006. -Vol. 27. - P. 731-754.
8. Baker W.D., Oneal J.R. Patriotism or opinion leadership? The nature and origins of the «rally 'round the flag» effect // Journal of conflict resolution. - Thousand Oaks, 2001. - Vol. 45. - P. 587-661.
9. Baum M.A., Gussin Ph. In the eye of the beholder: How Information shortcuts shape individual perceptions of bias in the media // Quarterly Journal of political science. - Delft, 2007. - N 3. - P. 1-31.
10. Brody R. Assessing presidential character: The media, elite opinion, and public support. - Stanford: Stanford univ. press, 1991.
11. Chaisty P., Whitefield S. The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on Russian Political Attitudes // Post-Soviet affairs. - L., 2012. - Vol. 28, N 2. - P. 187-208.
12. Downs A. An economic theory of democracy. - N.Y.: Harper, 1957. - 310 р.
13. Drazen A. The political business cycle after 25 years // NBER macroeconomics annual review. - Boston: MIT Press, 2000. - Vol. 15. - P. 75-138.
14. Evans G., Andersen R. The political conditioning of economic perceptions // Journal of politics. - Chicago, 2006. - P. 194-207.
15. Fiorina M.P. Retrospective voting in American national elections. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1981. - 249 p.
16. Fischhoff B. Hindsight: Thinking backward? // Psychology today. - N.Y., 1975. - Vol. 8. - P. 70-76.
17. Gandhi, J., Lust-Okar E. Elections under authoritarianism // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, CA, 2009. - Vol. 12. - P. 403-422.
18. Gasiorowski M.J. Economic crisis and political regime change: An event history analysis // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 1995. - Vol. 89. - P. 882-897.
19. Gerber A.S., Huber G.A. Partisanship and economic behavior: Do partisan differences in economic forecasts predict real economic behavior? // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 2009. - Vol. 103. - P. 407-426.
20. Goethals G.R. An attributional analysis of some social influence phenomena // New directions in attribution research. - Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ, 1976. - Vol. 1. - P. 291-310.
21. Gomez B.T., Wilson. J.M. Political Sophistication and attributions of blame in the wake of hurricane Katrina // Publius. - Oxford, 2008. - Vol. 38. - P. 633-650.
22. Haggard S., Kaufman R.R. Inequality and regime change: Democratic transitions and the stability of democratic rule // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 2012. - Vol. 106. - P. 495-516.
23. Hobolt S.B., Tilley J. Who’s in charge? How voters attribute responsibility in the European Union // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oakes, 2013. - Vol. 47. - P. 795-819.
24. Abney G., Hill L. Natural disasters as a politi-cal variable: The effect of a hurricane on an urban election // American Political Science Review. - Cambridge, 1966. - Vol. 60, N 04. - P. 974-981.
25. Jones E.E., Harris V.A. The attribution of attitudes // Journal of experimental social psychology. - Amsterdam, 1967. - Vol. 3. - P. 1-24.
26. Jones E.E., Nisbett, R.E. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior // Attrubtion: Perceiving the causes of behavior / E.E. Jones, D.E. Kanouse, H.H. Kelley, R.E. Nisbett, S. Valins, B. Weiner (eds). - N.Y.: General learning press, 1972. - P. 79-94.
27. Kelley H.H. Attribution theory in social psychology // Nebraska symposium on motivation. - Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska press, 1967. - P. 192-238.
28. Kelley H.H. The processes of causal attribution // American psychologist. - Washington, D.C., 1973. - Vol. 28. - P. 107-128.
29. Key V.O. The responsible electorate. - Cambridge: Harvard univ. press, 1966. - 158 p.
30. Kuklinski J.H., West D.M. Economic expectations and voting behavior in United States House and Senate elections // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 1981. - Vol. 75. - P. 436-447.
31. Linz J.J. The breakdown of democratic regimes: Crisis, Breakdown and reequilibration. - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins univ. press, 1978. - 144 p.
32. Lyons J., Jaeger J. Information, emotion, and the partisan presentations citizen: Paper delivered at the American Political Science Association annual meeting. - Washington D.C., 2014. - 21 p.
33. Malesky E., Schuler P. Nodding or needling: Analyzing delegate responsiveness in an authoritarian parliament // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 2010. - Vol. 104. - P. 1-21.
34. Malhotra N., Kuo A.G. Attributing blame: The Public’s response to hurricane katrina // Journal of politics. - Chicago, 2008. - Vol. 70. - P. 120-135.
35. Mansfield E., Snyder J. Democratization and the danger of war // International security. - Boston, 1995. - Vol. 20. - P. 5-38.
36. McAllister I., White S. Democratization in Russia and the global financial crisis // Journal of communist studies and transition politics. - L., 2011. - Vol. 27. - P. 476-495.
37. Miller D.T., Ross M. Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? // Psychological bulletin. - Washington, 1975. - Vol. 82. - P. 213-225.
38. Mueller J. Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 1970. - Vol. 64. - P. 18-34.
39. Nemeth C., Swedlund M., Kanki B. Patterning of a minority's responses and their influence on the majority // European journal of social psychology. - Malden, 1974. - Vol. 4. - P. 53-64.
40. Nisbett R.E., Ross L. Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. - Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980. - 334 p.
41. O’Donnell G.A. Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism. Studies in South American politics. - Berkeley: Univ. of California, 1973. - 219 p.
42. Pepinsky T.B. Economic crises and the breakdown of authoritarian regimes: Indonesia and Malaysia in comparative perspective. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2009. - 346 p.
43. Pettigrew T.F. The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice // Personality and social psychology bulletin. - Thousand Oaks, 1979. - Vol. 5. - P. 461-476.
44. Powell G.B. Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 2000. - 312 p.
45. Remmer K.L. The political impact of economic crisis in Latin America in the 1980 s // American political science review. - Palo Alto, 1991. - Vol. 85. - P. 777-800.
46. Reuter O.J., Robertson G. Legislatures, cooptation and social protest in contemporary authoritarian regimes // Journal of politics. - Chicago, 2015. - Vol. 77. - P. 235-248.
47. Rose R. Micro-economic Responses to a Macro-economic Crisis: A Pan-European Perspective // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. - L., 2011. - Vol. 27, N 3-4. - P. 364-384.
48. Rose R., Munro N., Mishler W. Resigned acceptance of an incomplete democracy: Russia’s political equilibrium // Post-Soviet affairs. - L., 2004. - Vol. 20. - P. 195-218.
49. Ross L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process // Advances in experimental social psychology. - Amsterdam, 1977. - Vol. 10. - P. 174-220.
50. Ross L. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process // Advances in experimental social psychology 10 / L. Berkowitz (ed.). - N.Y.: Academic Press, 1977. - P. 173-220.
51. Schedler A. The Politics of uncertainty: Sustaining and subverting electoral authoritariannism. - Cambridge: Oxford univ. press, 2013. - 479 p.
52. Shaver K.G. The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. - N.Y.: Springer-Verlag, 1985. - 194 p.
53. Shleifer A., Treisman D. A normal country // Journal of economic perspectives. - Pittsburgh, PA, 2005. - Vol. 19. - P. 151-174.
54. Shultz T.R., Schleifer M. Towards a refinement of attribution concepts // Attribution theory and research / J. Jaspars, F. Fincham, M. Hewstone (eds). - N.Y.: Academic Press, 1983. - P. 37-62.
55. Sigelman L., Conover P. The Dynamics of presidential support during international conflict situations // Political behavior. - N.Y., 1981. - Vol. 3. - P. 303-318.
56. Slovic P., Lichtentstein S. Preference reversals: A broader perspective // American economic review. - Pittsburgh, PA, 1983. - Vol. 73 - P. 596-605.
57. Taber Ch.S., Cann D., Kucsova S. The Motivated processing of political arguments // Political behavior. - N.Y., 2009. - Vol. 31. - P. 137-155.
58. Tanneberg D., Stefes C., Merkel W. Hard times and regime failure: Autocratic responses to economic downturns // Contemporary politics. - L., 2013. - Vol. 19. - P. 115-29.
59. Tilley J., Hobolt S. Is the government to blame?: An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility // The journal of politics. - Chicago, 2011. - Vol. 73. - P. 316-330.
60. Treisman D. Presidential popularity in a hybrid regime: Russia under Yeltsin and Putin // American journal of political science. - Palo Alto, 2011. - Vol. 55. - P. 590-609.
61. Treisman D. The politics of intergovernmental transfers in Post-Soviet Russia // British journal of political science. - Cambridge, 1996. - Vol. 26. - P. 299-335.
62. Trial by Fire: A Natural Disaster’s Impact on Support for the Authorities in Rural Russia / E. Lazarev, D. Sobolev, I. Soboleva, B. Sokolov // World politics. - Princeton, NJ, 2014. - Vol. 66. - P. 641-668.
63. Truex R. Who believes the people’s daily? Bias and Credibility in authoritarian media // Unpublished manuscript. - Princeton, NJ, 2016. - Mode of access: https://static1. squarespace.com/static/5431e6ebe4b07582c93c48e3/t/56f899fd9063409744813459/1459132926647/Manuscript+File+-+Bias+and+Trust+in+Authoritarian+Media+v+3-16.pdf (Дата посещения: 06.07.2016.)
64. Zaller J.R. The nature and origins of mass opinion. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 1992. - 367 p.
65. Zuckerman M. Attribution of success and failure revisited or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory // Journal of personality. - Hoboken, NJ, 1979. - Vol. 47. - P. 245-287.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
85
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 