Честность выборов и явка избирателей в условиях авторитаризма
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.01.04
Аннотация
В статье рассматривается вопрос, как восприятие честности выборов влияет на явку в условиях авторитаризма. Делается вывод, что восприятие выборов как относительно честных способствует увеличению явки. Однако авторитарные режимы способны добиваться высокой явки также посредством партийных механизмов и контроля над СМИ. Сочетание относительно честных выборов и высокого уровня авторитаризма может привести к снижению явки, поскольку способствует распространению среди оппозиционно настроенного электората абсентеизма как рациональной стратегии протеста. Воздействие нарушений на выборах на поведение избирателей обусловлено способностью последних распознавать эти нарушения.
Ключевые слова
выборы,
честные выборы,
явка избирателей,
авторитаризм,
elections,
fair elections,
voter turnout,
authoritarianism
Список литературы
1. Birch S. Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2010. - Vol. 43, N 12. - P. 1601-1622.
2. Birch S. Electoral malpractice. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2011. - 224 p.
3. Blais A., Dobrzynska A. Turnout in electoral democracies // European journal of political research. - Chichester, 1998. - Vol. 33, N 2. - P. 239-261.
4. Blais A. What affects voter turnout? // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, California, 2006. - Vol. 9, N 1. - P. 111-125.
5. Blaydes L. Elections and distributive politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. - 288 p.
6. Brambor T., Clark W.R., Golder M. Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses // Political analysis. - Cambridge, 2006. - Vol. 14, N 1. - P. 14-63.
7. Brinks D., Coppedge M. Diffusion is no illusion: Neighbor emulation in the third wave of democracy // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2006. - Vol. 39, N 4. - P. 463-489.
8. Brownlee J. Authoritarianism in an age of democratization. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2007. - 288 p.
9. Bui T. Elections in a communist party regime: Vietnam's electoral integrity reforms and challenges: Paper presented at the Australian Political Studies Association annual conference. - Sidney, 2014. - Mode of access: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2440088 (Accessed: 23.08.2018.)
10. Bunce V.J., Wolchik S.L. Defeating dictators: Electoral change and stability in competitive authoritarian regimes // World politics. - Baltimore, MD, 2010. - Vol. 62, N 1. - P. 43-86.
11. Cancela J., Geys B. Explaining voter turnout: A meta-analysis of national and subnational elections // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2016. - Vol. 42. - P. 264-275.
12. Carreras. M., İrepoğlu Y. Trust in elections, vote buying, and turnout in Latin America // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2013. - Vol. 32, N 4. - P. 609-619.
13. Political choice in Britain / Clarke H., Sanders D., Stewart M., Whiteley P. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2004. - 392 p.
14. Daadaoui M. Rituals of power and political parties in Morocco: Limited elections as positional strategies // Middle Eastern studies. - L.: Routledge, 2010. - Vol. 46, N 2. - P. 195-219.
15. Dahl R.A. On democracy. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1998. - 217 p.
16. Diaz-Cayeros A., Magaloni B., Weingast B.R. Tragic brilliance: Equilibrium party hegemony in Mexico // Social Science Research Network (SSRN). - 2003. -Mode of access: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153510 (Accessed: 23.08.2018.)
17. Echebarria Echabe A. System-justifying beliefs and political disaffection // Journal of applied social psychology. - Hoboken, NJ, 2014. - Vol. 44, N 3. - P. 234-240.
18. Egorov G., Guriev S., Sonin K. Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: A theory and evidence from panel data // American political science review. - Baltimore, MD, 2009. - Vol. 103, N 4. - P. 645-668.
19. Fornos C.A., Power T.J., Garand J.C. Explaining voter turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000 // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2004. - Vol. 37, N 8. - P. 909-940.
20. Franklin M. Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2004. - 294 p.
21. Friedgut T.H. Political participation in the USSR. - Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1979. - 253 p.
22. Furtak R.K. The political systems of the socialist states: An introduction to Marxist-Leninist regimes. - N.Y.: St. Martin’s press, 1987. - 308 p.
23. Gandhi J., Lust-Okar E. Elections under authoritarianism // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, California, 2009. - Vol. 12. - P. 403-422.
24. Gans-Morse J., Mazzuca S., Nichter S. Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections // American journal of political science. - N.Y., 2014. - Vol. 58, N 2. - P. 415-432.
25. Geddes B. Paradigms and sand castles: Theory building and research design in comparative politics. - Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan press, 2003. - 314 p.
26. Geys B. Voter turnout: A review of aggregate-level research // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2006. - Vol. 25, N 4. - P. 637-663.
27. Golosov G.V. Authoritarian party systems: Patterns of emergence, sustainability and survival // Comparative sociology. - Leiden, 2013. - Vol. 12, N 5. - P. 617-644.
28. Golosov G.V. Why and how electoral systems matter in autocracies // Australian journal of political science. - Melbourne, 2016 a. - Vol. 51, N 3. - P. 367-385.
29. Golosov G.V. Voter volatility in electoral authoritarian regimes: Testing the tragic brilliance’ thesis // Comparative sociology. - Leiden, 2016 b. - Vol. 15, N 5. - P. 535-559.
30. Goodnow R., Moser R.G., Smith T. Ethnicity and electoral manipulation in Russia // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2014. - Vol. 36. - P. 15-27.
31. Grönlund K., Setälä M. Political trust, satisfaction and voter turnout // Comparative European politics. - L., 2007. - Vol. 5, N 4. - P. 400-422.
32. Gunther R., Diamond L. Species of political parties: A new typology // Party politics. - Thousand Oaks, California, 2003. - Vol. 9, N 2. - P. 167-199.
33. Guterbock T.M. Machine politics in transition: Party and community in Chicago. - Chicago: Univ. of Chicago press, 1980. - 324 p.
34. Hadjar A., Beck. M. Who does not participate in elections in Europe and why is this // European societies. - L.: Routledge, 2011. - Vol. 12, N 4. - P. 521-542.
35. Howard M.M., Roessler P.G. Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes // American journal of political science. - N.Y., 2006. - Vol. 50, N 2. - P. 365-381.
36. Hyde S.D., Marinov N. Which elections can be lost? // Political analysis. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2012. - Vol. 20, N 2. - P. 191-201.
37. Inter-Parliamentary Union 2016 // PARLINE database on national parliaments. - Mode of access: http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp (Accessed: 23.08.2018.)
38. Isaacs R., Whitmore S. The limited agency and life-cycles of personalized dominant parties in the post-Soviet space: The cases of United Russia and Nur Otan // Democratization. - L., 2014. - Vol. 21, N 4. - P. 699-721.
39. Jackman R.W., Miller R.A. Voter turnout in the industrial democracies during the 1980s // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 1995. - Vol. 27, N 4. - P. 467-492.
40. Jensen N.M., Malesky E., Weymouth S. Unbundling the relationship between authoritarian legislatures and political risk // British journal of political science. - L., 2014. - Vol. 44, N 3. - P. 655-684.
41. Karklins R. Soviet elections revisited: Voter abstention in noncompetitive voting // American political science review. - Baltimore, MD, 1986. - Vol. 80, N 2. - P. 449-469.
42. Karp J.A., Banducci S.A. Political efficacy and participation in twenty seven democracies: How electoral systems shape political behaviour // British journal of political science. - L., 2008. - Vol. 38, N 2. - P. 311-334.
43. Kelley J. Data on international election monitoring: Three global datasets on election quality, election events and international election observation / ICPSR31461-v2. - Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university consortium for political and social research (ICPSR) [distributor], 2014. - August 29. - DOI: 10.3886/ICPSR31461.v2
44. Kostadinova T. Voter turnout dynamics in post-communist Europe // European journal of political research. - Amsterdam, 2003. - Vol. 42, N 6. - P. 741-759.
45. Kostadinova T., Power T.J. Does democratization depress participation? Voter turnout in the Latin American and Eastern European transitional democracies // Political
46. research quarterly. - Salt Lake City, Utah, 2007. - Vol. 60, N 3. - P. 363-377.
47. Kuenzi M., Lambright G.M. Voter turnout in Africa’s multiparty regimes // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2007. - Vol. 40, N 6. - P. 665-690.
48. Lehoucq F., Molina I. Stuffing the ballot box: Fraud, election reform, and democratization in Costa Rica. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2002. - 278 p.
49. Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. - New Haven: Yale univ. press, 1999. - 368 p.
50. Lindberg S.I. Consequences of electoral systems in Africa: A preliminary inquiry // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2005. - Vol. 24, N 1. - P. 41-64.
51. Democratization by elections: A new mode of transition / Ed. by S.I. Lindberg. - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins univ. press, 2009. - 406 p.
52. Lockhart G. Mass mobilisation in contemporary Vietnam // Asian studies review. - N.Y., 1997. - Vol. 21, N 2/3. - P. 174-179.
53. Lust-Okar E. Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan // Democratization. - L., 2006. - Vol. 13, N 3. - P. 456-471.
54. Magaloni B. Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2006. - 296 p.
55. Magaloni B. The game of electoral fraud and the ousting of authoritarian rule // American journal of political science. - N.Y., 2010. - Vol. 54, N 3. - P. 751-765.
56. Magaloni B., Kricheli R. Political order and one-party rule // Annual review of political science. - Palo Alto, California, 2010. - Vol. 13. - P. 123-143.
57. Malesky E., Schuler P. Paint-by-numbers democracy: The stakes, structure, and results of the 2007 Vietnamese national assembly election // Journal of Vietnamese studies. - Berkeley, 2009. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 1-48.
58. Martinez i Coma F. Turnout determinants in democracies and in non-democracies // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2016. - Vol. 41. - P. 50-59.
59. Mueller D.C., Stratmann T. The economic effects of democratic participation // Journal of public economics. - Amsterdam, 2003. - Vol. 87, N 9/10. - P. 2129-2155.
60. Munck G.L., Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices // Comparative political studies. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002. - Vol. 35, N 1. - P. 5-34.
61. Norris P. Electoral engineering: Voting rules and political behavior. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2002. - 226 p.
62. Norris P. Why electoral integrity matters. - N.Y.: Cambridge univ. press, 2014. - 297 p.
63. Pacek A.C., Pop-Eleches G., Tucker J.A. Disenchanted or discerning: Voter turnout in post-communist countries // Journal of politics. - Chicago: The university of Chicago press, 2009. - Vol. 71, N 2. - P. 473-491.
64. Pappas T.S. Patrons against partisans: The politics of patronage in mass ideological parties // Party politics. - Thousand Oaks, CA, 2009. - Vol. 15, N 3. - P. 315-334.
65. Pérez-Liñán A. Neoinstitutional accounts of voter turnout: Moving beyond industrial democracies // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2001. - Vol. 20, N 2. - P. 281-297.
66. Perceptions of electoral integrity (PEI-4.5) / P. Norris, F. Martinez i Coma, A. Nai, M. Gromping // Harvard Dataverse. V2. - 2016. - DOI: 10.7910/DVN/LYO57K.Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation: The European experience in historical and comparative perspective / Ed. by S. Piattoni. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2001. - 256 p.
67. Pop-Eleches G., Tucker J.A. Communist socialization and post-communist economic and political attitudes // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2014. - Vol. 33. - P. 77-89.
68. Radcliff B., Davis P. Labor organization and electoral participation in industrial democracies // American journal of political science. - N.Y., 2000. - Vol. 44, N 1. - P. 132-141.
69. Rodan G. Embracing electronic media but suppressing civil society: Authoritarian consolidation in Singapore // Pacific review. - L.: Routledge, 2003. - Vol. 16, N 4. - P. 503-524.
70. Schattschneider E.E. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. - N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1960. - 147 p.
71. Schatz E. The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan // Comparative politics. - N.Y.; Chicago, Ill., 2009. - Vol. 41, N 2. - P. 203-222.
72. Schedler A. The nested game of democratization by elections // International political science review. - Beverly Hills, CA, 2002. - Vol. 23, N 1. - P. 103-122.
73. Simpser A. Does electoral manipulation discourage voter turnout? Evidence from Mexico // Journal of politics. - Chicago: The univ. of Chicago press, 2012. - Vol. 74, N 3. - P. 782-795.
74. Smets K., van Hamb C. The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout // Electoral studies. - Amsterdam, 2013. - Vol. 32, N 2. - P. 344-359.
75. Smith B. Life of the party: The origins of regime breakdown and persistence under single-party rule // World politics. - Baltimore, MD, 2005. - Vol. 57, N 3. - P. 421-451.
76. Stockemer D., LaMontagne B., Scruggs L. Bribes and ballots: The impact of corruption on voter turnout in democracies // International political science review. - Beverly Hills, CA, 2013. - Vol. 34, N 1. - P. 74-90
77. Stockemer D. What affects voter turnout? A review article: Meta-analysis of aggregate research // Government and opposition. - Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2017. - Vol. 52, N 4 - P. 698-722. - DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gov.2016.30.
78. Stokes S.C. Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina // American political science review. - Baltimore, MD, 2000. - Vol. 99, N 3. - P. 315-325.
79. Tóka G. Expressive vs. instrumental motivation of turnout, partisanship and political learning // The comparative study of electoral systems / Ed. by H.-D. Klingemann. - Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2009. - P. 269-288.
80. Tullock G. The charity of the uncharitable // Western economic journal. - Long Beach: Calif. Western Economic Association, 1971. - Vol. 9, N 4. - P. 379-392.
81. van Ham C., Lindberg S.I. Choosing from the menu of manipulation: Explaining incumbents’ choices of electoral manipulation tactics. - Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, 2016. - (V-Dem Institute Working Paper; N 30). - Mode of access: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2788475 (Accessed: 23.08.2018.)
82. Zavadskaya M., Welzel C. Subverting autocracy: Emancipative mass values in competitive authoritarian regimes // Democratization. - L., 2015. - Vol. 22, N 6. - P. 1105-1130.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
94
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 