Preview

Политическая наука

Расширенный поиск

О «тектонических сдвигах» (или их отсутствии?) драйверов международной мощи и влияния: Опыт дискриминантного анализа

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.04

Аннотация

Assessing the power and influence of states on the world arena has always been one of the most pressing tasks in political science and international relations. Nevertheless, the problem of creating a universally recognized tool for measuring national power remains unsolved. The article presents one of the strategies of such an evaluation - discriminant analysis, which, in our opinion, has several advantages compared with its analogs. One of the obvious advantages of this method is the use of computational algorithms for finding the optimal «weights» of indicators in the index of national power based on training samples. The latter are sets of countries with maximum and minimum influence, obtained on the basis of expert assessments. In other words, using training samples gives researchers the opportunity to formalize mathematically the exact combination of indicators applied to estimate a state’s international power. Basing upon methodology developed in the project «Political Atlas of the Modern World», we apply it to the analysis of a wider data set, which includes 1995, 2005 and 2015. We track the dynamics of changes in the determinants of power and influence potential from 1995 to 2015, and come to an unexpected conclusion about the absence of any «tectonic» shifts in its components. Two dimensions of power potential, related, on the one hand, to economic and institutional factors, and, on the other hand, to military force, have remained the key ones over the past twenty years. Another empirical result of the study is a set of concrete estimations of international power potential for more than 190 countries during the period mentioned above.

Об авторах

Сергей Александрович Жеглов
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»
Россия


Юрий Алексеевич Полунин
Институт проблем управления им. В.А. Трапезникова РАН
Россия


Список литературы

1. Ахременко А.С., Миронюк М.Г. Динамика потенциалов влияния государств (по материалам проекта «Политический атлас современности») // Общественные науки и современность. - М., 2019. - № 1. - С. 39-59.

2. Ледяев В.Г. Современные концепции власти: Аналитический обзор // Социологический журнал. - М., 1996. - №. 3/4. - С. 109-126.

3. Мельвиль А.Ю. Могущество и влияние современных государств в условиях меняющегося мирового порядка: некоторые теоретико-методологические аспекты // Политическая наука. - М., 2018. - №. 1. - С. 173-200.

4. Миронюк М.Г., Толокнев К.А., Мальцев А.М. Военная мощь в мировой политике: для победы в войне, для предотвращения войны и (или) для обретения статуса? // Международные процессы. - М., 2018. - Т. 16, №. 2(53). - С. 26-48.

5. Политический атлас современности: Опыт многомерного статистического анализа политических систем современных государств / А.Ю. Мельвиль, М.В. Ильин, Е.Ю. Мелешкина и др. - М.: Изд-во «МГИМО-Университет», 2007. - 272 с.

6. Типология несоциалистических стран (опыт многомерно-статистического анализа народных хозяйств) / Л.А. Гордон, В.Л. Тягуненко, Л.И. Фридман и др. - М.: Наука, 1976. - 271 с.

7. Alcock N.Z., Newcombe A.G. The perception of national power // Journal of Conflict Resolution. - N.Y., 1970. - Т. 14, N 3. - P. 335-343.

8. Baldwin D.A. Power analysis and world politics: New trends versus old tendencies // World politics. - Baltimore, 1979. - Т. 31, N 2. - P. 161-194.

9. Chang C.L. A measure of national power. - 34 p. - Mode of access: http://www.analytickecentrum.cz/upload/soubor/original/measure-power.pdf (accessed: 6.10.2018.)

10. Doomsday Clock Statement: It Is 2 Minutes to Midnight / Ed. by J. Mecklin // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. - 2018. - Mode of access: https://thebulletin.org/sites/default/files/2018%20Doomsday%20Clock%20Statement.pdf (accessed: 19.04.2019.)

11. Doomsday Clock Statement: A new era // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. - 1991. - Mode of access: https://thebulletin.org/sites/default/files/1991%20Clock%20Statement.pdf (accessed: 19.04.2019.)

12. German F.C. A tentative evaluation of world power // Journal of Conflict Resolution. - N.Y., 1960. - Т. 4, N 1. - P. 138-144.

13. Guzzini S. On the measure of power and the power of measure in International Relations. - 2009. - 18 p. - (DIIS working paper; N 28). - Mode of access: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44660/1/615078389.pdf (accessed: 6.10.2018.)

14. Presentation a new model to measure national power of the countries / M.R. Hafeznia, S.H. Zarghani, Z. Ahmadipor, A.R. Eftekhari // Journal of Applied Sciences. - Faisalabad; Punjab, Pakistan, 2008. - Т. 8. - P. 230-240.

15. Hart J. Three approaches to the measurement of power in international relations // International Organization. - Cambridge, 1976. - Т. 30, N 2. - P. 289-305.

16. Huang M.L., Hsu Y.Y. Fetal distress prediction using discriminant analysis, decision tree, and artificial neural network // Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. - Wuhan, China, 2012. - Т. 5, N 09. - P. 526-533.

17. Ikenberry G.J. The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order // Foreign Affairs. - N.Y., 2014. - Т. 93, N 3. - P. 80-90.

18. Kim H.M. Comparing measures of national power // International Political Science Review. - Cambridge, 2010. - Т. 31, N 4. - P. 405-427.

19. Kugler J., Arbetman M. Choosing among measures of power: A review of the empirical record // Power in world politics. - N.Y., 1989. - P. 49-77.

20. Kugler J., Domke W. Comparing the strength of nations // Comparative Political Studies. - L.; Thousand Oaks, 1986. - Т. 19, N 1. - P. 39-69.

21. National Power Index 2012 / S. Kumar, K. Sibal, S.D. Pradham, A.M.M. Matheswaran, R. Bedi, B. Ganguly. - New Delhi: Foundation of National Research, 2012. - 27 p. - Mode of access: http://www.fnsr.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=4173 (accessed: 15.05.2019.)

22. McCulloh I., Armstrong H., Johnson A. Social network analysis with applications. - Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2013. - 320 p.

23. Mead W.R. The return of geopolitics: The revenge of the revisionist powers // Foreign Affairs. - N.Y., 2014. - Т. 93, N 3. - P. 69-79.

24. Measuring national power in the postindustrial age / A.J. Tellis, J. Bially, C. Layne, M. McPherson. - N.Y.: Rand Corporation, 2001. - 182 p.

25. Singer J.D. Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816-1985 // International Interactions. - L., 1988. - Т. 14, N 2. - P. 115-132.

26. Zipp J.F. Left-right dimensions of Canadian federal party identification: A discriminant analysis // Canadian Journal of Political Science. - Cambridge, 1978. - Т. 11, N 2. - P. 251-278.


Рецензия

Просмотров: 161


Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)