Статус и международные изменения: Российские уроки
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.07
Аннотация
Дважды за последние 25 лет действия СССР и России приводили к принципиальным изменениям в международных отношениях. Оба раза статус играл решающую роль в качестве катализатора этих исторических изменений. Необходима эволюционная теория изменений в международных отношениях, способная объединить исторические первопричины изменений и их непосредственные причины в одной объяснительной рамке. И в период окончания холодной войны, и сегодня исторические первопричины изменений ограничили число возможных стратегий для руководства России. Но определяющую роль в окончательном выборе внешнеполитического курса играли соображения, связанные со статусом. Исторические процессы были первопричиной изменений, а связанные со статусом соображения и неудовлетворенность им стали непосредственными причинами последовавших перемен.
Об авторе
Андрей Крикович
Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики» (ВШЭ)
Россия
Россия
Список литературы
1. Безруков А., Сушенцов А. Контуры тревожного будущего // Россия в глобальной политике. - 2015. - 24 August. - Режим доступа: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/ kontury-trevozhnogo-buduschego-17635 (Дата посещения: 25.05.2019.)
2. Караганов С. Венский концерт XXI века // Российская газета. - 2015. - 3 июня. - Режим доступа: https://rg.ru/2015/06/03/karaganov.html (Дата посещения: 23.05.2019.)
3. Лукьянов Ф. Безрассудный Запад // РИА Новости. - 2011. - 21 июля.
4. Bennett A. The Guns That Didn't Smoke: Ideas and the Soviet Non-Use of Force in 1989 // Journal of Cold War Studies. - 2005. - Vol. 7, N 2. - P. 81-109.
5. Bogaturov A. «Coercion to Partnership» and the Flaws of an Unbalanced World // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2011. - 29 December. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/ number/Coercion-to-Partnership-and-the-Flaws-of-an-Unbalanced-World-15423(accessed: 25.05.2019.)
6. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas // International Security. - 2000. - Vol. 25, N 3. - P. 5-53.
7. Burrows M. Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. - Washington, D.C.: US National Intelligence Council, 2012. - 166 p.
8. Buzan B. Brilliant but now wrong: a sociological and historical sociological assessment of Gilpin’s «War and Change in World Politics» // Power, Order, and Change in World Politics / Ed. by G.J. Ikenberry. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 233-262.
9. Carr E.H. The twenty years' crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. - L.: MacMillan, 1946. - 247 p.
10. Checkel J. Ideas, institutions, and the Gorbachev foreign policy revolution // World Politics. - 1993. - Vol. 45, N 02. - P. 271-300.
11. Checkel J.T. The constructive turn in international relations theory // World politics. - 1998. - Vol. 50, N 02. - P. 324-348.
12. Clunan A. The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence. - Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2009. - 317 p.
13. Dafoe A., Renshon J., Huth P. Reputation and status as motives for war // Annual Review of Political Science. - 2014. - N 17. - P. 371-393.
14. Finnemore M., Sikkink K. Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics // Annual review of political science. - 2001. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 391-416.
15. Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. - New York: Free Press, 1992, 464 p.
16. Gaddis J.L. International relations theory and the end of the Cold War // International Security. - 1992. - Vol. 17, N 3. - P. 5-58.
17. Gilpin R. War and Change in World Politics. - New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981. - 288 p.
18. God gave physics the easy problems: adapting social science to an unpredictable world / S. Bernstein, R.N. Lebow, J.G. Stein, S. Weber // European Journal of International Relations. - 2000. - Vol. 6, N 1. - P. 43-76.
19. Gould S.J. Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. - New York: WW Norton, 1989. - 352 p.
20. Grieco J.M. Liberal international theory and imagining the end of the Cold War //
21. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. - L., 2009. - Vol. 11, N 2. - P. 192-204.
22. Haas R.N. The age of nonpolarity: What will follow US dominance // Foreign Affairs. - 2008. - Vol. 87, N 3. - P. 44-56.
23. Herman R.G. Identity, Norms, and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War // The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics / Ed. by Peter J. Katzenstein. - New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. - P. 271-316.
24. Herz M. Brazil: Major Power in the Making? Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics. - New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. - 242 p.
25. Holsti K. The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory // Holsti K. A Pioneer in International Relations Theory. - New York: Springer International Publishing, 2016. - P. 37-55.
26. Ikenberry G.J. The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order // Foreign Affairs. - 2014. - Vol. 93, N 80. - Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/china/2014-04-17/illusion-geopolitics (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
27. Karaganov S. Global Challenges and Russia’s Foreign Policy // Strategic Analysis. - 2016. - Vol. 40, N 6. - P. 461-473.
28. Kokoshin A. Soviet Strategic Thought, 1917-1991. - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998. - 225 p.
29. Kortunov A. The Splendours and Miseries of Geopolitics // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2016. - 16 January. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/book/
30. The-Splendours-and-Miseries-of-Geopolitics-17258 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
31. Krickovic A. When ties do not bind: the failure of institutional binding in NATO Russia relations // Contemporary Security Policy. - 2016. - Vol. 37, N 2. - P. 175-199.
32. Kubálková V., Cruickshank A.A. Thinking New About Soviet «New Thinking». - Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. - 143 p.
33. Larson D.W., Shevchenko A. Shortcut to greatness: The new thinking and the revolution in Soviet foreign policy // International Organization. - 2003. -Vol. 57, N 01. - P. 77-109.
34. Lebow R.N. A cultural theory of international relations. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2008. - 776 p.
35. Lo B. Russia and the New World Disorder. - Washington, DC: Brookings, 2015. - 336 p.
36. Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives / Ed. by T. Volgy, R. Corbetta, K.A. Grant, R.G. Baird. - New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. - 242 p.
37. Makarychev A., Morozov V. Is «Non-Western Theory» Possible? The Idea of Multipolarity and the Trap of Epistemological Relativism in Russian IR // International Studies Review. - 2013. - Vol. 15, N 3. - P. 328-350.
38. Mearsheimer J.J. Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault: the liberal delusions that provoked Putin // Foreign Affairs. - 2014. - Vol. 93. - Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
39. Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations. - New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948. - 489 p.
40. Neumann I.B. Status Is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status // Status in World Politics / Ed. by T.V. Paul, D. Larson, W. Wohlforth. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 85-114.
41. Nikonov V. Back to the Concert // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2002. - 16 November. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_12 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
42. Paul T.V., Shankar M. Status accommodation through institutional means: India’s rise and the global order // Status in World Politics. - 2014. - P. 165-191.
43. Pu X., Schweller R.L. Status signaling, multiple audiences, and China’s blue-water naval ambition // Status in world Politics. - Oxford: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 141-162.
44. Renshon J. Status Deficits and War // International Organization. - 2016. - Vol. 70, N 3. -P. 513-550.
45. Rosenau J.N. Security in a turbulent world // Current History. - 1995. - N 94 (592). - P. 193-200.
46. Sarotte M.E. 1989: the struggle to create post-Cold War Europe. - Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. - 344 p.
47. Status in World Politics / Ed. by T.V. Paul, D. Larson, W. Wohlforth. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 85-114.
48. Stoner K., McFaul M. Who Lost Russia (This Time)? Vladimir Putin // The Washington Quarterly. - 2015. - Vol. 38, N 2. - P. 167-187.
49. Suslov D. For a Good Long While // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2014. - 18 December. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/For-a-Good-Long-While-17211 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
50. Tsygankov A. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. - Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. - 336 p.
51. Tsygankov A.P. Vladimir Putin's last stand: the sources of Russia's Ukraine policy // Post-Soviet Affairs. - 2015. - Vol. 31, N 4. - P. 279-303.
52. Wendt A. Social theory of international politics. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. - 429 p.
53. Wohlforth W. Gilpinian realism and international relations // International Relations. - 2011. - Vol. 25, N 4. - P. 499-511.
54. Wohlforth W. Honor as interest in Russian decisions for war, 1600-1995 // Honor Among Nations: Intangible Interests and Foreign Policy / Ed. by E. Abrams. - Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1998. - P. 21-45.
55. Wohlforth W. The stability of a unipolar world // International Security. - 1999. - Vol. 24, N 1. - P. 5-41.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
85
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 