How Can Russia Contribute to our Understanding of Change in World Politics?
https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.07
Abstract
Twice over the last 25 years, the USSR and Russia’s actions have been a major catalyst for change in international politics. Gorbachev and his fellow New Thinkers adopted unprecedented concessions that dismantled the Soviet Empire and brought an end to the Cold War. Contemporary Russian leaders are undertaking a risky challenge to US global leadership that signals an end to post-Cold War US dominance and the beginning of an era of unprecedented global disorder. Existing paradigms have had a difficult time accounting for Soviet/Russian behavior and integrating it into their larger theories about change in international politics. This is partly because they have ignored the important role that status considerations have played in Soviet and Russian decision making. But it also reflects larger shortcomings in the way that these paradigms approach the issue of change. What is needed is an evolutionary theory of change that is able to integrate driving historical (root) causes of change with proximate and contingent ones. In both of these cases, larger historical forces have pushed the international system towards change, limiting the choices available to Russian leaders. Yet it has been status considerations that have determined the actual policy choices Soviet and Russian leaders have made. While larger historical forces have been the root cause behind change, status aspirations and status dissatisfaction have been the proximate causes catalyzing change and moving it forward.
About the Author
A. . Krickovic
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Безруков А., Сушенцов А. Контуры тревожного будущего // Россия в глобальной политике. - 2015. - 24 August. - Режим доступа: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/ kontury-trevozhnogo-buduschego-17635 (Дата посещения: 25.05.2019.)
2. Караганов С. Венский концерт XXI века // Российская газета. - 2015. - 3 июня. - Режим доступа: https://rg.ru/2015/06/03/karaganov.html (Дата посещения: 23.05.2019.)
3. Лукьянов Ф. Безрассудный Запад // РИА Новости. - 2011. - 21 июля.
4. Bennett A. The Guns That Didn't Smoke: Ideas and the Soviet Non-Use of Force in 1989 // Journal of Cold War Studies. - 2005. - Vol. 7, N 2. - P. 81-109.
5. Bogaturov A. «Coercion to Partnership» and the Flaws of an Unbalanced World // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2011. - 29 December. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/ number/Coercion-to-Partnership-and-the-Flaws-of-an-Unbalanced-World-15423(accessed: 25.05.2019.)
6. Brooks S.G., Wohlforth W.C. Power, Globalization, and the End of the Cold War: Reevaluating a Landmark Case for Ideas // International Security. - 2000. - Vol. 25, N 3. - P. 5-53.
7. Burrows M. Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds. - Washington, D.C.: US National Intelligence Council, 2012. - 166 p.
8. Buzan B. Brilliant but now wrong: a sociological and historical sociological assessment of Gilpin’s «War and Change in World Politics» // Power, Order, and Change in World Politics / Ed. by G.J. Ikenberry. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 233-262.
9. Carr E.H. The twenty years' crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. - L.: MacMillan, 1946. - 247 p.
10. Checkel J. Ideas, institutions, and the Gorbachev foreign policy revolution // World Politics. - 1993. - Vol. 45, N 02. - P. 271-300.
11. Checkel J.T. The constructive turn in international relations theory // World politics. - 1998. - Vol. 50, N 02. - P. 324-348.
12. Clunan A. The Social Construction of Russia's Resurgence. - Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2009. - 317 p.
13. Dafoe A., Renshon J., Huth P. Reputation and status as motives for war // Annual Review of Political Science. - 2014. - N 17. - P. 371-393.
14. Finnemore M., Sikkink K. Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics // Annual review of political science. - 2001. - Vol. 4, N 1. - P. 391-416.
15. Fukuyama F. The End of History and the Last Man. - New York: Free Press, 1992, 464 p.
16. Gaddis J.L. International relations theory and the end of the Cold War // International Security. - 1992. - Vol. 17, N 3. - P. 5-58.
17. Gilpin R. War and Change in World Politics. - New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981. - 288 p.
18. God gave physics the easy problems: adapting social science to an unpredictable world / S. Bernstein, R.N. Lebow, J.G. Stein, S. Weber // European Journal of International Relations. - 2000. - Vol. 6, N 1. - P. 43-76.
19. Gould S.J. Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. - New York: WW Norton, 1989. - 352 p.
20. Grieco J.M. Liberal international theory and imagining the end of the Cold War //
21. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. - L., 2009. - Vol. 11, N 2. - P. 192-204.
22. Haas R.N. The age of nonpolarity: What will follow US dominance // Foreign Affairs. - 2008. - Vol. 87, N 3. - P. 44-56.
23. Herman R.G. Identity, Norms, and National Security: The Soviet Foreign Policy Revolution and the End of the Cold War // The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics / Ed. by Peter J. Katzenstein. - New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. - P. 271-316.
24. Herz M. Brazil: Major Power in the Making? Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics. - New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. - 242 p.
25. Holsti K. The Problem of Change in International Relations Theory // Holsti K. A Pioneer in International Relations Theory. - New York: Springer International Publishing, 2016. - P. 37-55.
26. Ikenberry G.J. The illusion of geopolitics: The enduring power of the liberal order // Foreign Affairs. - 2014. - Vol. 93, N 80. - Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ articles/china/2014-04-17/illusion-geopolitics (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
27. Karaganov S. Global Challenges and Russia’s Foreign Policy // Strategic Analysis. - 2016. - Vol. 40, N 6. - P. 461-473.
28. Kokoshin A. Soviet Strategic Thought, 1917-1991. - Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998. - 225 p.
29. Kortunov A. The Splendours and Miseries of Geopolitics // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2016. - 16 January. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/book/
30. The-Splendours-and-Miseries-of-Geopolitics-17258 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
31. Krickovic A. When ties do not bind: the failure of institutional binding in NATO Russia relations // Contemporary Security Policy. - 2016. - Vol. 37, N 2. - P. 175-199.
32. Kubálková V., Cruickshank A.A. Thinking New About Soviet «New Thinking». - Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989. - 143 p.
33. Larson D.W., Shevchenko A. Shortcut to greatness: The new thinking and the revolution in Soviet foreign policy // International Organization. - 2003. -Vol. 57, N 01. - P. 77-109.
34. Lebow R.N. A cultural theory of international relations. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2008. - 776 p.
35. Lo B. Russia and the New World Disorder. - Washington, DC: Brookings, 2015. - 336 p.
36. Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives / Ed. by T. Volgy, R. Corbetta, K.A. Grant, R.G. Baird. - New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. - 242 p.
37. Makarychev A., Morozov V. Is «Non-Western Theory» Possible? The Idea of Multipolarity and the Trap of Epistemological Relativism in Russian IR // International Studies Review. - 2013. - Vol. 15, N 3. - P. 328-350.
38. Mearsheimer J.J. Why the Ukraine crisis is the West's fault: the liberal delusions that provoked Putin // Foreign Affairs. - 2014. - Vol. 93. - Mode of access: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/russia-fsu/2014-08-18/why-ukraine-crisis-west-s-fault (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
39. Morgenthau H.J. Politics Among Nations. - New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1948. - 489 p.
40. Neumann I.B. Status Is Cultural: Durkheimian Poles and Weberian Russians Seek Great-Power Status // Status in World Politics / Ed. by T.V. Paul, D. Larson, W. Wohlforth. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 85-114.
41. Nikonov V. Back to the Concert // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2002. - 16 November. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/n_12 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
42. Paul T.V., Shankar M. Status accommodation through institutional means: India’s rise and the global order // Status in World Politics. - 2014. - P. 165-191.
43. Pu X., Schweller R.L. Status signaling, multiple audiences, and China’s blue-water naval ambition // Status in world Politics. - Oxford: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 141-162.
44. Renshon J. Status Deficits and War // International Organization. - 2016. - Vol. 70, N 3. -P. 513-550.
45. Rosenau J.N. Security in a turbulent world // Current History. - 1995. - N 94 (592). - P. 193-200.
46. Sarotte M.E. 1989: the struggle to create post-Cold War Europe. - Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014. - 344 p.
47. Status in World Politics / Ed. by T.V. Paul, D. Larson, W. Wohlforth. - L.: Cambridge University Press, 2014. - P. 85-114.
48. Stoner K., McFaul M. Who Lost Russia (This Time)? Vladimir Putin // The Washington Quarterly. - 2015. - Vol. 38, N 2. - P. 167-187.
49. Suslov D. For a Good Long While // Russia in Global Affairs. - 2014. - 18 December. - Mode of access: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/For-a-Good-Long-While-17211 (accessed: 25.05.2019.)
50. Tsygankov A. Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. - Plymouth, UK: Rowman & Littlefield, 2016. - 336 p.
51. Tsygankov A.P. Vladimir Putin's last stand: the sources of Russia's Ukraine policy // Post-Soviet Affairs. - 2015. - Vol. 31, N 4. - P. 279-303.
52. Wendt A. Social theory of international politics. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. - 429 p.
53. Wohlforth W. Gilpinian realism and international relations // International Relations. - 2011. - Vol. 25, N 4. - P. 499-511.
54. Wohlforth W. Honor as interest in Russian decisions for war, 1600-1995 // Honor Among Nations: Intangible Interests and Foreign Policy / Ed. by E. Abrams. - Washington, DC: Ethics and Public Policy Center, 1998. - P. 21-45.
55. Wohlforth W. The stability of a unipolar world // International Security. - 1999. - Vol. 24, N 1. - P. 5-41.
Review
Views:
84
Email this article 
Post a Comment 