Preview

Political science

Advanced search

States in Networks: Network Approach in International Studies

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2019.03.14

Abstract

In this work we review articles devoted to the network analysis of international relations, which were published in foreign journals during last 10 years. We also consider the Russian input to the network studies of international relations. The articles we review can be divided into two topical groups: on the one hand, there are studies of interstate relations in the system of international organizations and military conflicts; on the other hand, the network of interstate relations can be analyzed in the context of trade links. Network analysis gives an opportunity to analyze the structure of international relations, its dynamics, as well as to evaluate power and influence of states in the network. Network analysis is also used as a secondary method to test hypotheses about factors of interstate links formation or about links’ influence on various political and economic processes.

About the Author

I. E. Gavrilenkova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation


References

1. Анализ влияния стран в сети международной миграции / Ф.Т. Алескеров, Н.Г. Мещерякова, А.Н. Резяпова, С.В. Швыдун // Политическая наука. - 2016. - № 4. - C. 137-158.

2. Дегтерев Д.А. Сетевой анализ международных отношений // Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 6. Политология. Международные отношения. - СПб., 2015. - № 4. - C. 119-138.

3. Жданов П.А. «Группа двадцати» в терминах и категориях сетевого подхода // Вестник международных организаций. - М., 2013. - Т. 8, № 3. - С. 61-72.

4. Сетевой подход в изучении межгосударственных конфликтов / Ф.Т. Алескеров, М.С. Курапова, Н.Г. Мещерякова, М.Г. Миронюк, С.В. Швыдун // Политическая наука. - М., 2016. - № 4. - C. 111-137.

5. Aleskerov F., Meshcheryakova N., Shvydun S. Centrality Measures in Networks based on Nodes Attributes, Long-Range Interactions and Group Influence. - Moscow, 2016. - 44 p. - (Working papers by NRU Higher School of Economics; N WP7/2016/04).

6. Aleskerov F.T., Andrievskaya I.K., Permjakova Е.Е. Key borrowers detected by the intensities of their short-range interactions. - Moscow, 2014. - 18 p. - (Working

7. papers by NRU Higher School of Economics. Series FE «Financial Economics»; N WP BRP 33/FE/2014).

8. Baxter P., Jordan J., Rubin L. How small states acquire status: A social network analysis // International Area Studies Review. - Oslo, 2018. - Vol. 21, N 3. - P. 191-213.

9. Chyzh O. Dangerous liaisons: An endogenous model of international trade and human rights // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 409-423.

10. Corbetta R., Grant K.A. Intervention in Conflicts from a Network Perspective // Conflict Management and Peace Science. - University Park, PA, 2012. -Vol. 29, N 3. - P. 314-340.

11. Fordham B., Poast P. All Alliances Are Multilateral: Rethinking Alliance Formation // Journal of Conflict Resolution. - College Park, MD, 2016. - Vol. 60, N 5. - P. 840-865.

12. Haim D.A. Alliance networks and trade: The effect of indirect political alliances on bilateral trade flows // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 472-490.

13. Kim H.M., Lee D., Feiock R.C. Network Power and Militarized Conflicts // Armed Forces & Society. - San Marcos, TX, 2011. - Vol. 38, N 2. - P. 291-317.

14. Kinne B.J. Agreeing to arm: Bilateral weapons agreements and the global arms trade // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 359-377.

15. Kinne B.J. IGO membership, network convergence, and credible signaling in militarized disputes // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2013. - Vol. 50, N 6. - P. 659-676.

16. Levina O., Hillmann R. Wars of the World: Evaluating the Global Conflict Structure During the Years 1816-2001 Using Social Network Analysis // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. - Amsterdam, 2013. - N 100. - P. 68-79.

17. Lupu Y., Greenhill B. The networked peace: Intergovernmental organizations and international conflict // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2017. - Vol. 54, N 6. - P. 833-848.

18. Lupu Y., Poast P. Team of former rivals: A multilateral theory of non-aggression pacts // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 344-358.

19. Lupu Y., Traag V.A. Trading Communities, the Networked Structure of International Relations, and the Kantian Peace // Journal of Conflict Resolution. - College Park, MD, 2012. - Vol. 57, N 6. - P. 1011-1042.

20. Maoz Z., Joyce K.A. The effects of shocks on international networks: Changes in the attributes of states and the structure of international alliance networks // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 292-309.

21. Network Interdependencies and the Evolution of the International Arms Trade / P.W. Thurner, C.S. Schmid, S.J. Cranmer, G. Kauermann // Journal of Conflict Resolution. - College Park, MD, 2018. - P. 1-29. - Mode of access: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022002718801965

22. Ward H., Dorussen H. Standing alongside your friends: Network centrality and providing troops to UN peacekeeping operations // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 392-408.

23. Warren T.C. Modeling the coevolution of international and domestic institutions:

24. Alliances, democracy, and the complex path to peace // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 424-441.

25. Weidmann N.B. Communication networks and the transnational spread of ethnic conflict // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2015. - Vol. 52, N 3. - P. 285-296.

26. Wilson M., Davis D.R., Murdie A. The view from the bottom: Networks of conflict resolution organizations and international peace // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2016. - Vol. 53, N 3. - P. 442-458.

27. Woo J. Oil export, external prewar support for the government, and civil conflict onset // Journal of Peace Research. - Oslo, 2017. - Vol. 54, N 4. - P. 513-526.


Review

Views: 149


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)