Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Modern trends in public administration: from new public management to governance of public policy

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2022.03.05

Abstract

The article examines the evolution of the conceptual paradigm of public administration under the influence of the response of administrative reforms to emerging crisis phenomena in the economy and society. At the end of the last decades of the last century, administrative transformations took place under the influence of the neoliberal strategy of public administration managerialization, i.e., the introduction of market mechanisms and structures into it. Ideologically, these administrative reforms were based on the New Public Management. By the end of the century, however, the failures and paradoxes of this line of reform and its ideology became visible. It required a restructuring of the administrative system in the direction of including citizens and their associations in the administrative process. The network, horizontal mechanism of governance has found expression in the concept of a New Public Governance. However, here, too, the focus on «governance without government» turned out to be a deterrent to the publicity of public administration. In the second decade, new needs began to emerge related to a more systematic public administration and its connection with public policy. Concepts such as «holistic», «strategic», «flexible» and «resilient» governance reflected a new relationship between politics and administration - from differentiation to unity. On this basis, as shown in the article, Governance of Public Policy can be a probable ideological model of new public administration.

About the Author

L. V. Smorgunov
Saint Petersburg state university
Russian Federation

Saint Petersburg



References

1. Acemoglu D., Robinson J. Why nations fail. The Origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. London: Crown business, 2012, 544 p.

2. Butler R. The evolution of the civil service – A progress report. Public administration. 1993, Vol. 71, N 3, P. 395–406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1993.tb00981.x

3. Carney P. Understanding public policy. Theories and issues. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012, 327 p.

4. Charbit Cl. Governance of public policy in decentralized contexts. A multi-level approach. OECD regional development working papers. 2011, N 4, P. 1–23. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg883pkxkhc-en

5. Connolly J., Zwet A. van der. Public value in Britain: A ‘Post-New public management’ environment? In: Connolly J., Zwet A. van der (eds). Public value management, governance and reform in Britain. Cham: Springer, 2021, P. 15–44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55586-3_2

6. Head B.W. Wicked problems in public policy. Understanding and responding to complex challenges. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2022, 176 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94580-0

7. Hill M., Hupe P. Implementing public policy: Governance in theory and in practice. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage, 2002, 232 p.

8. Johnsøn J., Marcinkowski L., Sześciło D. Organisation of public administration: Agency governance, autonomy and accountability. SIGMA Papers. Paris: OECD publishing, 2021, N 63, 73 р. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/20786581

9. Kurtz M., Schrank A. Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms. The journal of politics. 2007, Vol. 69, N 2, P. 538–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00549.x

10. Maor M. The paradox of managerialism. Public administration review. 1999, Vol. 59, N 1, P. 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/977475

11. Mehde V. Governance, administrative science, and the paradoxes of new public management. Public policy and administration. 2006, Vol. 21, N 4, P. 60–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670602100406

12. Meier K.J., Compton M., Polga-Hecimovich J., Song M., Wimpy C. Bureaucracy and the failure of politics: challenges to democratic governance. Administration & Society. 2019, Vol. 51, N 10, P. 1576–1605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399719874759

13. Neilson D., Stubbs Th. Competition states in the neoliberal era: towards thirdgeneration regulation theory. Competition & Change. 2016, Vol. 20, N 2, P. 122–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529415623917

14. Prange C., Hennig A. From strategic planning to strategic agility patterns. Journal of creating value. 2019, Vol. 5, N 2, P. 111–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319867778

15. Schmidt J. Intuitively neoliberal? Towards a critical understanding of resilience governance. European journal of international relations. 2015, Vol. 21, N 2, P. 402–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066114537533

16. Welsh E., Wong W. Public Administration in global context: bridging the gaps of theory and practice between Western and Non-Western Nations. Public administration review. 1998, Vol. 58, N 1, P. 40–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976888

17. Ylöstalo H., Adkins L. Economizing the political: workfare reform in strategic management mode. Current sociology. 2021, Vol. 69, N 5, P. 723–741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120913579

18. Zhao L. Conceptualizing the social economy in China. Modern Asian studies. 2013, Vol. 47, N 3, P. 1083–1123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X12000650


Review

Views: 589


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)