Bureaucratic patronage and patterns of administrative recruitment of regional elites in Russia: a comparative network analysis

The significance of informal practices and institutions in political and economic life in Russia has been largely recognized by a variety of research fields within social sciences. As existing literature shows, informal deformation also affects state bureaucracy including the recruitment process into the highest executive agencies. Patronage ties are more than merely individual deviation. Its systematic nature necessitates considering it as a network structure, which can be done through the theoretical tools provided by Social Network Analysis. Based on existing approaches to the quantification of patronage ties, the author proposes a new perspective, which comprises studying them as a model of a weighted graph. The patronage ties can differ significantly in terms of their stability and power, and researchers might take this diversity into account when analyzing patronage networks. To this end, the author proposes the patronage tie index comprising three parameters, namely the duration of a shared work experience, its frequency, and the fact of promotion. Relying on these assumptions and on the basis of systematic biographical analysis, the author examines the structure of patronage networks within two of Russia's regions, namely Perm Krai and Chelyabinsk Oblast. The analysis shows that it is difficult to discern the general pattern of the structuring of such networks. These are different in terms of degrees of cohesion and centralization. The matching of the network positions with the types of official positions does not reveal the general pattern either. Presumably, the specific models can be explained by the individual strategies available for particular leaders.

1. Afanasiev M. Clientelism and Russian statehood. Moscow : Moscow public science foundation, 2000, 301 p. (In Russ.)

2. Baturo A., Elkink J. Dynamics of regime personalization and patron–client networks in Russia, 1999–2014. Post-Soviet Affairs. 2016, Vol. 32, N 1, P. 75–98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2015.1032532

3. Bratanovsky S. Textbook on administrative law. Moscow : Direct-Media, 2013, 326 p. (In Russ.)

4. Chapkovskii P. Social networks and administrative recruitment in Russia: the case of the Federal Government in 2000–2008. MA Graduation Thesis. Saint Petersburg : European university in Saint Petersburg, 2011, 42 p. (In Russ.)

5. Easter G. Reconstructing the state: personal networks and elite identity in Soviet Russia. New York : Cambridge university press, 1999, 222 p.

6. Garifullina G., Kazantcev K., Yakovlev A. United we stand: the effects of subnational elite structure on succession in two Russian regions. Post-Soviet affairs. 2020, Vol. 36, N 5–6, P. 475–494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2020.1785244

7. Gel’man V. The vicious circle of post-Soviet neopatrimonialism. Social sciences and contemporary world. 2016, N 1, P. 103–116. (In Russ.)

8. Gilev A. Introduction. Black cats in dark rooms: studies of political patronage in social sciences and humanities. In: Gilev A. (ed.). Patron-client relations in history and modernity: chrestomathy. Moscow : ROSSPEN, 2016, P. 6–41. (In Russ.)

9. Gimpelson V., Magun V. Serving the Russian state: prospects and constraints for young civil servants' careers. The Russian public opinion herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2004, Vol. 73, N 5, P. 19–36. (In Russ.)

10. Hale H. Patronal politics: Eurasian regime dynamics in comparative perspective. New York : Cambridge university press, 2014, 538 p.

11. Keller F. Moving beyond factions: using social network analysis to uncover patronage networks among Chinese elites. Journal of East Asian studies. 2016, Vol. 16, N 1, P. 17–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2015.3

12. Ledeneva A. Can Russia modernise?: Sistema, power networks and informal governance. New York : Cambridge university press, 2013, 314 p.

13. Ledeneva A., Shushanian N. Telephone justice in Russia. The Russian public opinion herald. Data. Analysis. Discussions. 2008, N 3, P. 42–50. (In Russ.)

14. Medard J. Le rapport de clientèle : du phénomène social à l'analyse politique. Revue française de science politique. 1976, N 26 (1), P. 103–131.

15. Opsahl T., Agneessens F., Skvoretz J. Node centrality in weighted networks: Generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social networks. 2010, Vol. 32, N 3, P. 245–251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006

16. Panizza F., Peters B., Ramos Larraburu C. Roles, trust and skills: A typology of patronage appointments. Public administration. 2019, Vol. 97, N 1, P. 147–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12560

17. Petrov N. Are changes in network Russia possible? Kontrapunkt. 2017, N 9, P. 1–15. (In Russ.)

18. Raghavan U., Albert R., Kumara S. Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics. 2007, Vol. 76, N 3, P. 036106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.76.036106

19. Reisinger W., Willerton J. Elite mobility in the locales: towards a modified patronage model. In: Lane D. (ed.). Elites and political power in the USSR. Aldershot : Elgar, 1988, P. 99–127.

20. Scott J. Patron-client politics and political change in Southeast Asia. The American political science review. 1972, Vol. 66, N 1, P. 91–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1959280

21. Seidman S. Network structure and minimum degree. Social networks. 1983, Vol. 5, N 3, P. 269–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(83)90028-x

22. Seleev S., Pavlov A. Garazhniki. Moscow : Strana Oz, 2016, 168 p. (In Russ.)

23. Startsev Y. Personally-oriented interactions in public administration. In: Alexandrov A.A., Zerchaninov T.E., Samkov K.N., Startsev Ya.Yu. (eds). Public agencies in the system of social interactions: sociological, political and managerial analysis. Yekaterinburg : UAPA, 2009, P. 31–59. (In Russ.)

24. Startsev Y. Neo-feudalism and neopatrimonialism: applying past-oriented metaphors to study of Russian politics. In: Alekseev V.V. (ed.) Social sciences in Ural academia: priorities and prospects of research aspirations. Materials of the all-Russian scientific conference. Yekaterinburg : UAPA, 2013, P. 342–351 (In Russ.)

25. Willerton J. Patronage networks and coalition building in the Brezhnev era. Soviet studies. 1987, Vol. 39, N 2, P. 175–204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668138708411685