Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Political symbols and symbolic policy of the Western European left radical parties

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.03.08

Abstract

The concept of agonistic democracy put forward by Ch. Mouffe opposes both the understanding of political conflict as antagonistic, the parties of which regard each other as implacable enemies, and the actual denial of the conflict in the consensus theories of democracy. This concept, in which a political conflict is seen as a struggle between two opponents, each of which recognizes the legitimacy of the other, has found its implementation in the activities of new left-wing radical parties that have appeared in Western Europe over the past 10-15 years. Their appearance was a reaction to the crisis and the decline of most of the «old» left-wing radical parties that came after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of the USSR. The «new» left-wing radicals seek to develop their own identity, which is different from the communist and social-democratic ones, which is also manifested in the new emblematic symbols they invent, which are not like the sickle, hammer, and five-pointed star of the «old» left-wing radicals, and in the new discursive strategies. On the example of the Podemos party (Spain), as well as the Left Party of France and the Party «Unconquered France», it is examined how the «new» left radicals construct the subject of political action - «people», «popular majority» or simply «We», opposed «Those above», «caste», «oligarchy». But with all the harshness of anti-capitalist and anti-liberal rhetoric, the conflict of «new» left-wing radicals with the system is more agonistic than antagonistic: they want not to destroy the old institutions, but to win them back from the opposite side, not to replace democracy with the dictatorship of the advanced class, but to «return» its people and expand it.

About the Author

S. А. Sergeev
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University
Russian Federation

Kazan 



References

1. Астахова Е.В. "Штурм небес", или Особенности политического дискурса "Подемос" // Ибероамериканские тетради. 2016. № 1(11). С. 21-28. EDN: XCKJFP

2. Малинова О.Ю. Конструирование смыслов. Исследование символической политики в современной России. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2013. 421 с.

3. Сергеев С.А., Кузьмина С.В. Движение "желтых жилетов" и левые радикалы во Франции // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2019. № 3. С. 127-138. DOI: 10.22394/2071-2367-2019-14-3-126-138 EDN: ZTTYZL

4. Хенкин С.М. Феномен "Подемос" // Ибероамериканские тетради. 2016. № 1(11). С. 15-20. EDN: XCKJFF

5. Agustin O.G., Briziarelli M. Left-wing populism and the assault on the establishment // Podemos and the new political cycle. Left-wing populism and anti-establishment politics / O.G. Agustin, M. Briziarelli (eds). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 281-294. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6

6. Franze J. The podemos discourse: a journey from antagonism to agonism // Podemos and the new political cycle. Left-wing populism and anti-establishment politics / O.G. Agustin, M. Briziarelli (eds). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. P. 49-69. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63432-6

7. Iglesias P. Spain on edge // New left review. 2015. N 93. May-June. P. 23-42.

8. Laclau E., Mouffe Ch. Gegemony and socialist strategy. Toward a radical democratic politics. L.: Verso, 1985. 197 p.

9. March L., Rommerskirchen Ch. Out of left field? Explaining the variable electoral success of European radical left parties // Party politics. 2015. Vol. 21, N 1. Р. 40-53. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812462929

10. Mouffe Ch. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Wien: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), 1999. 18 p. Mode of access: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/1312/ (accessed: 20.03.2020).

11. Mouffe Ch. The democratic paradox. L.: Verso, 2000. 192 p.


Review

Views: 116


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)