Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Actualization of images of the past in citizens' ideas about the future of Russia

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.02.11

Abstract

   The article is devoted to the analysis of the results of a political and psychological study of the perception of Russian citizens of their country, conducted in the fall of 2022. The empirical basis of the study was obtained using qualitative methods: in-depth formalized interviews, incomplete sentences, projective drawing techniques. The article concludes that the image of the future of Russia is becoming clearer in the views of Russians, compared to the results obtained in previous studies, but some respondents also retain a feeling of uncertainty. Two scenarios of the country's development are revealed, positive and negative one, each of which is conditioned in the respondents' views by the events of the past, with which their consciousness draws logical analogies. The study showed that there is some consensus in the views and opinions of citizens regarding their country since the current event context stimulates less controversial assessments of historical events. The events currently taking place are interpreted by the mass consciousness as a repetition of the events of the past and allow to structure the historical memory of various strata of Russian society in a system of opposite evaluations (good-bad), leveling out the ambiguity (and at the same time irrelevance). History during periods of turbulence is perceived not only as «some-thing of the past», but also as «something that is happening now» and as «something that will be repeated in the future». The study reveals a trend of political perception demonstrating the connection between images of the past and images of the future, which we call the mechanism of the «Renaissance» construction of the image of the future, within which the perception of time by citizens acquires special features. It is suggested that the mechanism of the «Renaissance» construction of the future allows the consciousness of the respondents to get messianic ideas from the past, in the absence of unique messianic ideas in the modern communicative space, and to determine some universal, understandable guidelines for everyone to strive for now and in the future, both personally and collectively. The revealed polarity in citizens' assessments of the past, present and future of Russia, as well as the segmentation of these assessments, are determined by subjective factors of political perception: the influence of generational features of the perceiver's worldview, the individual and group social experience they have acquired.

About the Authors

Z. R. Usmanova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation; INION
Russian Federation

Zaire Usmanova

Moscow



N. V. Smulkina
Lomonosov Moscow State University; INION
Russian Federation

Natalia Smulkina

Moscow



References

1. Alcock N. Z., Newcombe A. G. The perception of national power. The journal of conflict resolution. 1970, Vol. 14, N 3, P. 335–343. doi: 10.1177/002200277001400304

2. Bryzgalov A. L. Images of the past and images of the future as derivatives of the present. Image of the future. Digest of articles. Oryol: Kartush, 2021, P. 21–25. (In Russ.)

3. Caplan B. Rational ignorance versus rational irrationality. Kyklos, 2001, Vol. 54, N 1, P. 3–26. doi: 10.1111/1467-6435.00138

4. Denisov Yu. P. The role of images of the past in Russian political discourse. In: Tyumentseva G. I. (ed.). Man and society in an unstable world. Materials of the international scientific-practical conference. Omsk: Omsk Law Academy, 2019, P. 37–41. (In Russ.)

5. Evgenyeva T. V. Crimea in the space of Russian Identity: figurative and symbolic dimension. Values and meanings. 2017, Vol. 50, N 4, P. 20–33. (In Russ.)

6. Granberg D., Kasmer J., Nanneman T. An empirical examination of two theories of political perception. Western political quarterly. 1988, Vol. 41, N 1, P. 29–46. doi: 10.1177/106591298804100103

7. Herb G., Kaplan D. Scaling identities nationalism and territoriality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017, 226 p.

8. MacCrone D. Bechhofer F. Understanding national identity. Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 2015, 226 p.

9. Malinova O. Yu. Symbolic politics and the construction of macropolitical identity in post-Soviet Russia. Polis. Political studies. 2010, N 2, P. 90–105. (In Russ.)

10. Miroshnichenko I. V. Spatial image of Europe in the minds of Russian youth. Bulletin of the Perm University. Political science. 2018, N 2, P. 31–44. (In Russ.)

11. Popova O. V. The basic matrix of the state policy of identity in modern Russia. Political space and social time. 2016, P. 160–165. (In Russ.)

12. Selezneva A. V. Historical representations in the structure of modern Russian youth’s civic consciousness. Istoriya. 2021, N 1 (12). doi: 10.18254/s207987840013809-8 (In Russ.)

13. Selezneva A. V., Smulkina N. V. Images of the countries of the Slavic world in the minds of Russian citizens (on the example of Ukraine and Belarus). Rusin. 2020, Vol. 54, N 4, P. 352–371. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obrazy-stran-slavyanskogo-mira-v-soznanii-rossiyskih-grazhdan-na-primere-ukrainy-i-belorussii?ysclid=lik7naej35301511828 (In Russ.)

14. Semenenko I. S., Lapkin V. V., Pantin V. I. Identity in the coordinate system of world development. Polis. Political Studies. 2010, N 3, P. 40–59. (In Russ.)

15. Shestopal Ye. B., Smulkina N. V. Factors of political perception of post-soviet countries in contemporary Russian society. Polis. Political studies. 2018, N 1, P. 26–44. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2018.01.03 (In Russ.)

16. Shestopal E. B. (ed.). "They" and "We". Images of Russia and the world in the minds of Russian citizens. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2021, 420 p. (In Russ.)

17. Siddy M. National Identities and foreign policy in the European Union the Russia policy of Germany, Poland and Finland. ECPR Press, 2017, 224 p.

18. Titov V. V. The Politics of memory and the formation of national-state identity: Russian experience and new trends. Moscow: Printing house "Your format", 2017, 184 p. (In Russ.)

19. Zamyatin N. Yu. The meaning of position: place in mental-geographical spaces. Cultural geography. 2011, N 4, P. 60–67. (In Russ.)

20. Zheltikova I. V., Bryzgalov A. L. The problem of forming images of the past and images of the future as elements of the temporal picture of the world. Philosophical Thought. 2022, N 11, P. 73–94. URL: https://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_39207.html?ysclid=lik76z0shi559190061


Review

Views: 487


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)