Preview

Political science

Advanced search

Pro-governmental think tanks in modern Russia: a functional approach

https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.04.06

Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the development of Russian think tanks, most associated with the government: The Institute of Public Design (INOP), the Foundation for the Development of Civil Society (FoRGO), the Institute of Socio-Economic and Political Studies (ISEPS) and the Expert Institute of Social Research (EISR). It demonstrates that all the four think tanks are characterized by a high expression of research/analytical and communicative functions, as well as by the absence of the implementation function, which is probably typical for all clients think tanks. The educational function is less expressed, but still is present. The creative function associated with the search for solutions to the identified problems is present in the public field of the earliest of the structures considered in this paper – INOP.

Three think tanks reviewed (excluding FoRGO), have a resource function expressed in the distribution of grant money from the federal budget. Finally, in the activities of FoRGO and EISR, it is possible to identify such a new function for independent thought factories as an instructional and advisory one.

About the Authors

A. Yu. Sungurov
HSE University
Russian Federation

Sungurov Alexander

St. Petersburg



D. A. Kiseleva
HSE University
Russian Federation

Kiseleva Darya

St. Petersburg



References

1. Abelson D. Northern Lights: Exploring Canada’s Think Tank Landscape. Montréal et Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press, 2016, 392 p.

2. Balayan A.A., Sungurov A.Yu. Think tanks in the conditions of global transformations. Saint. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2022, 318 p. (In Russ.)

3. Efremenko D.V. Think tanks and the foreign policy agenda of modern Russia. Political Science (RU). 2015, N 3, P. 91–111. (In Russ.)

4. Malinova O.Y. Expert-analytical organizations and the formation of the public agenda: analysis of ideological practices in modern Russia. Political Science (RU). 2013, N 4, P. 192–210. (In Russ.)

5. The Political atlas of modernity: The experience of multidimensional statistical analysis of the political systems of modern states. Moscow: Publishing House “MGIMOUniversity”, 2007, 272 p. (In Russ.)

6. Sungurov A.Yu. How political innovations arise: “think tanks” and other mediation institutions. – Moscow: Political Encyclopedia, 2015. – 383 p/

7. Notebooks on conservatism: An Almanac. N 1. Moscow: Non–profit Foundation – Institute of Socio–Economic and Political Studies (ISEPI Foundation), 2023, 364 p.

8. Zaytsev D., Belyaeva N.Y. Determinants of the policy impact of analytical communities in Russian regions: Cases of Karelia, Tatarstan and Saratov. Central European journal of public policy. 2017, Vol. 11, N 2, P. 23–42.

9. Zazulya O.A. Redistributive policy towards NGOs in Russia in 2015. Master's thesis, 2016. Protected within the framework of the HSE – SPb program “Politics and Management”. Mode of access: https://studbooks.net/2024070/finansy/pereraspredelitelnaya_politika_v_otnoshenii_nko_v_rossii_v_2015_godu (accessed: 23.03.2023).


Review

Views: 335


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1998-1775 (Print)