Narratives in the area of power. The possibilities and limits of narrative politics

Experience shows that narratives are gradually becoming the main tool for organizing public discourse, gaining substantial significance for all political actors maneuvering in the space of power. This raises a research problem: how do the mechanisms of public promotion of political stories change the communicative environment in the space of power, while fitting into the general political course of the state and influencing the goals of competing actors, thereby transforming society’s reaction to the rivalry of political meanings and values embedded in stories.

One way to solve this problem is to consider the role of narratives in the area of public policy, where the latter is understood as a type of power space that reflects the competition of rival forces and their targeted projects. This perspective, which combines the established interpretations of state policies in the scientific literature with the targeted use of narratives, allows us to clarify the political functionality of this cognitive construct that influences public opinion and political change.

Methodologically, the solution to this problem involves the use of the principles of non-classical and non-classical methodologies with their nomothetic strategies, which make it possible to link the deployment of political narratives with public policy actors, as well as structures and mechanisms of political and administrative regulation. This allows us to correctly use the vocabulary of the targeted use of narratives, describing the relevant actions of structures and institutions through the prism of constructivist, communicative and narrative approaches that reveal the process of assimilation of target invectives by people and taking into account the transversal connections of public and latent actors, administrative and political methods of political design.

1. Berinsky A.J., Kinder D. R. Making sense of issues through media frames: understanding Kosovo crisis. The Journal of politics. 2006, Vol. 68, N 3, P. 640–656.

2. Bourdieu P. Sociology of social space. Moscow: Institute of Experimental Sociology; St. Petersburg: Aleteya, 2007, 288 p. (In Russ.)

3. Epstein J. M. Modeling civil violence: An agent-based computational approach. Proceedingsof the National Academy of Sciences. 2002, Vol. 99, N 3, P. 7243–7250.

4. Forattini F. For a broader understanding of corruption as a culture fact, and its influence in society. Academia letters. 2021, Article 2245.

5. Hajer M. Discourse coalitions and the Institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain. In: Fischer F., Forester J. (eds). The argumentative turn. Durham: Duke university press, 1993, P. 43–76.

6. Hirsch R., Baxter J., Brown C. The importance of skillful leaders: understanding municipal pesticide policy change in Calgary and Halifax. Journal of environmental planning and management. 2010, Vol. 53, N 6, P. 743–757.

7. Jessop B. Cultural political economy, spatial imaginaries, regional economic dynamics. In: Brand O., Eser P., Dörhöfer S. (eds). Ambivalenzen regionaler kulturen und identitäten. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2012, P. 2–29.

8. Jones M., McBeth M., Shanahan E. Introducing the narrative policy framework. In: Jones M. D., Shanahan E. A., McBeth M. K. The science of stories: Applications of the narrative policy framework. New York: Palgrave, 2014, P. 1–25.

9. Jones M., Radaelli C. Narrative policy framework: child or monster? Critical policy studies. 2015, Vol. 9, N 3, P. 339–355.

10. Jungrav-Gieorgica N. Narrative policy framework – public policy as a battle of narratives. Studia z Polityki Publicznej. 2020, Vol. 7, N 2, P. 109–135.

11. Kirillov A.G. Political narrative: structure and pragmatics: based on the material of the modern English-language press. Ph. D. degree dissertation. Samara, 2007, 209 p. (In Russ.)

12. Knill C., Tosun J. Public policy: A new introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020, 363 p.

13. Knoepfel P., Larrue C., Varone F., Hill M. Public policy analysis. Bristol: Policy Press, 2007, 336 p.

14. Konkov A.E. The latent space of public policy in the modern state: in search of a theoretical model. Moscow: Argamak-media, 2021, 222 p. (In Russ.)

15. Kuenzler J., Stauffer B. Policy dimension: A new concept to distinguish substance from process in the narrative policy framework. Policy studies journal. 2022, Vol. 51, N 1, P. 11–32.

16. Kuhlmann J., Blum S. Narrative plots for regulatory, distributive, and redistributive policies. European policy analysis. 2021, Vol. 7, N S2, P. 276–302.

17. Likhachev D.S. On the national character of Russians. Philosophical sciences. 1990, N 4, P. 3–6. (In Russ.)

18. Lowi T. American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World politics. 1964, N 16 (4), P. 677–715.

19. McBeth M., Lybecker D., Garner K. The Story of good citizenship: framing public policy in the context of duty-based versus engaged citizenship. Politics & Policy. 2010, N 38 (1), P. 1–23.

20. Malinova O. Legitimizing Putin’s regime. The transformations of the narrative of Russia’s Post-Soviet transition. Communist and post-communist studies. 2022, Vol. 55, N 1, P. 52–75.

21. McBeth M., Shanahan E., Arnell R., Hathaway P. The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory. The policy studies journal. 2007, N 35, P. 87–108.

22. Musikhin G.I. Narrative as a semantic element of political symbolization. Questions of theoretical economics. 2024, N 2, P. 116–133. (In Russ.)

23. Narzary К., Narzary А. Analyzing the diverse perspectives on balance of power. Journal of propulsion technology. 2023, Vol. 44, N 4, P. 2665–2670.

24. Petrosyan S.P. Symbol: essence and purpose. Bulletin of Omsk University. 2018, N 4 (23), P. 103–114. (In Russ.)

25. Pleger L., Lutz P., Sugar F. Public acceptance of incentive-based spatial planning policies: A framing experiment. Land use policy. 2018, N 73, P. 225–238.

26. Podshibyakina T.A. Narrative politics: theory and discursive practices. Questions of political science. 2021, N 11, P. 1968–1979. (In Russ.)

27. Pomiguev M.A., Prokopchuk T.L., Koshkin A.V. Possibilities of the method of narrative analysis or how to look for political values in Russian cinema? Political Science (RU). 2024, N 3, P. 45–65. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.04.02 (In Russ.)

28. Pralle S. Branching out digging in: environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington: Georgetown Press, 2006, 279 p.

29. Sabatier P., Jenkins-Smith H. (eds) Рolicy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press, 1993, 290 p.

30. Schlaufer C., Kuenzler J., Jones M., Shanahan E. The narrative policy framework: A traveler’s guide to policy stories. Polit vierteljahresschr. 2022, N 63, P. 249–273.

31. Shanahan E., Jones M., McBeth M. Policy narratives and policy processes. The policy studies journal. 2011, Vol. 39, N 3, P. 535–561.

32. Shanahan E., Jones M., McBeth M., Lane R. An angel on the wind: How heroic policy narratives shape policy realities. The Policy studies journal. 2013, N 41 (3), P. 453–483.

33. Shanahan E., Raile E., French K., McEvoy J. Bounded stories. The policy studies journal. 2018 а, N 46 (4), P. 922–948.

34. Shanahan E., Jones M., McBeth M. How to conduct a narrative policy framework study. The social science journal. 2018 b, N 55 (3), P. 332–45.

35. Sheigal E.I. The multifaceted narrative. Political linguistics. 2007, Vol. 22, N 2, P. 86–93. (In Russ.)

36. Smirnov V.A. Political elites in small countries: questions of theory. Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2017, 151 p. (In Russ.)

37. Soloviev A.I., Konkov A.E. Latent mechanisms of public policy formation. Moscow: Aspect-press, 2022, 96 p. (In Russ.)

38. Soloviev A.I. Latent functionality of public policy. Political Science (RU). 2022, N 3, P. 57–79. (In Russ.)

39. Soloviev A.I. Inside elite communication: collisions of ideological and narrative symbolization. Power and elites. 2024, Vol. 11, N 3, P. 7–28. (In Russ.)

40. Soloviev A.I. Doctrinal symbolization and political vernacular of narratives. What is changing in the public field? Policy. Political Studies. 2025, N 1, P. 66–87. (In Russ.)

41. Stone D. Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: WW. Norton, 2012, 408 р.

42. Tosun J., Schaub S. Constructing policy narratives fortransnational mobilization: Insights from European citizens’ initiatives. European Policy Analysis. 2021, Vol. 7, P. 344–364.

43. Uldanov A.A. Policy narratives in parliamentary debates: approaches to analyzing narrative elements, functions, and strategies. Political science (RU). 2024, N 3, P. 66–86. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2024.03.03 (In Russ.)

44. Weible C., Sabatier P. (eds). Theories of the policy process. New York: Westview Press, 2017, 416 p.

45. Windhoff-Héritier A. Policy-Analyse. Frankfurt am Main: Campus-Verlag, 1987, 185 p.