УМНАЯ СИЛА: Эссе
Аннотация
В статье раскрывается концепция умной силы и особенности ее применения в современной мировой политике, в частности во внешней политике США в ходе их конкуренции за мировое лидерство и гегемонию с растущими Китаем, Индией и Европейским союзом. Анализируются история и современное состояние государственной стратегии умной силы США, а также других стран, большая стратегия государства как предпосылки становления глобального управления, формирующегося на основе переплетения усилий как государств, так и наднациональных институтов.
Ключевые слова
умная сила,
стратегия,
США,
Китай,
ЕС,
одно- и многополярность,
smart power,
strategy,
United States of America,
China,
EU,
unipolarity and multipolarity
Список литературы
1. Absolutely // The Economist. – L., 2010. – 23 January, N 4. – P. 75.
2. Allaby D. We underestimate the value of soft power. – 2009. – Mode of access: http://www.publicservice.co.uk/feature_story.asp?id=13333 (Дата посещения: 27.07.2012.)
3. Beukel E. China and the South China sea: Two faces of power in the rising China’s neighborhood policy. – Copenhagen: Danish institute for international studies, 2010. – 26 p. – Mode of access: http://www.diis.dk/sw92785.asp (Дата посещения: 28.07.2012.)
4. Brzezinski Z. Second chance: Three presidents and the crisis of American superpower. – N.Y.: Basic Books, 2007. – 234 p.
5. Clarke R.A. How to win the war on terror // Newark Star Ledger. – New Jersey, 2004. – 21 November.
6. Craig G., Gilbert F. Reflections on strategy in the present and future // Makers of modern strategy: From Machiavelli to the nuclear age / Paret P. (ed.). – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1986. – 871 p.
7. America’s national interests: A report from the commission on America’s National Interests. – Cambridge: The Commission, 1996. – 60 p.
8. Ferguson N. The decade the world tilted east // Financial Times. – L., 2009. – 28 December. – Mode of access: http://www.angellam.com/news/FT.com%20-%20The%20decade%20the%20world%20tilted%20east.pdf (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
9. Gaddis J. Strategies of containment. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 1982. – 432 p.
10. Ganz M. Why David sometimes wins. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2009. – 368 p.
11. Ikenberry J. When China rules the world: The end of the Western world and the birth of a new global order: Review // Foreign affairs. – N.Y., 2009. – Vol. 88. – Mode of access: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/65610/martin-jacques/when-china-rules-the-world-the-end-of-the-western-world-and-the- (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
12. Inboden W. What is power? And how much of it does America have? // Holidays. – Dhaka, 2009. – 24 May.
13. Kaul I., Grunberg I., Stern M.A. Global public goods: International cooperation in the 21st Century. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1999. – 17 p.
14. Keltner D. The power paradox // Greater good. – Berkeley, 2007. – Vol. 8. – P. 17.
15. Gallaroti G. The power curse: Influence and illusion in world politics. – Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2009. – 209 p.
16. Kennedy P. Rome offers Obama a lesson in limits // Financial Times. – L., 2009. – 30 December.
17. Kennedy R. The elements of strategic thinking: A practical guide // Teaching strategy: Challenge and response / Marcella G. (ed.). – Carlisle, PA: US Army Strategic Studies Institute, 2010. – 26 p.
18. Keohane R.O. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. – Princeton: Princeton univ. press, 1984. – 312 p.
19. Snidal D. The limits of hegemonic stability theory // International organization. – Cambridge, MA, 1985. – Vol. 39. – P. 580–614.
20. Keohane R.O., Victor D. The regime complex for climate change. – Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, 2010. – 34 p. – (Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements: Discussion Paper; 10–33.)
21. Kindleberger C.P. World economic primacy, 1500–1990. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press. – 1996. – 223 p.
22. Kissinger H. Diplomacy. – N.Y.: Simon & Schuster, 1994. – 912 p.
23. Kissinger H. Realists vs. idealists // International Herald Tribune. – N.Y., 2005. – 12 May. – Mode of access: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/05/11/opinion/11iht-edkissinger.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
24. Krauthammer C. The Bush doctrine: ABM, Kyoto, and the New American Unilateralism // The Weekly Standard. – Washington, DC, 2001. – 4 June. – Mode of access: http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Protected/Articles/000/000/000/474abspw.asp (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
25. Laidi Z. Europe as a risk averse power: A hypothesis // Garnet Policy Brief. – Coventry: Univ. of Warwick, 2010. – Vol. 11. – 16 p.
26. Illegitimacy moderates the effect of power on approach / Lammers J., Galinsky A., Gordijn E., Otten S. // Psychological Science. – N.Y., 2008. – Vol. 19. – P. 558–564.
27. Luce E. Obama doctrine hinges on economy // Financial Times. – L., 2010. – 28 May.
28. Mandelbaum M. The case for Goliath: How America acts as the world’s government in the twenty-first century. – N.Y.: Public Affairs, 2005. – 320 p.
29. Martinez-Diaz L., Woods N. The G20 – the perils and opportunities of network governance for developing countries. – Oxford: Univ. of Oxford, 2009. – 4 p. – Mode of access: http://www.globaleconomicgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/G20_
30. PolicyBrief.pdf (Дата посещения: 27.07.2012.)
31. Mayo A., Nohria N. In their times: The greatest business leaders of the twentieth century. – Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2005. – 444 p.
32. McDougal W.A. Can the United States do grand strategy? // Orbis. – Philadelphia, PA, 2010. – Vol. 54. – P. 165–184.
33. Norrlof C. America’s global advantage: US hegemony and international cooperation. – Cambridge: Cambridge univ. press, 2010. – 286 p.
34. Nye J. The future of power. – N.Y.: Public affairs press, 2011. – 320 p.
35. Nye J. The powers to lead. – Oxford: Oxford univ. press, 2008. – 240 p.
36. Obama B. National security strategy. – Washington, DC: The White House, 2010. – 52 p. – Mode of access: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf (Дата посещения: 28.07.2012.)
37. Olson M. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. – Cambridge, MA: Harvard univ. press, 1965. – 176 p.
38. Putnam R., Bayne N. Hanging together: The seven-power summits. – Cambridge: Harvard univ. press, 1984. – 262 p.
39. Pomfret J. Newly powerful China defies Western nations with remarks, Policies // Washington Post. – Washington, DC, 2010. – 15 March.
40. Posen B. Command of the commons: The military foundation of U.S. Hegemony // International Security. – Cambridge: Harvard univ., 2003. – Vol. 28. – P. 5–46.
41. Posen B.R. The case for restraint // The American Interest. – Washington, DC, 2007. – Vol. 6. – Mode of access: http://www.the-american-interest.com/article.cfm?piece=331 (Дата посещения: 10.08.2012.)
42. Sanger D. A red ink decade // New York Times. – N.Y., 2010. – 2 February.
43. Restraining order: For strategic modesty / Sapolsky H., Friedman B. H., Golz E., Press D. // World Affairs. – Washington, DC, 2009. – Vol. 172. – Mode of access: http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/article/restraining-order-strategic-modesty (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
44. Gaddis J.L. Strategies of containment: A critical appraisal of postwar American national security policy. – N.Y.: Oxford univ. press, 1982. – 448 p.
45. Slaughter A.-M. America’s edge: Power in the networked century // Foreign Affairs, 2009. – Vol. 88, N 1. – Mode of access: http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/63722/anne-marie-slaughter/americas-edge (Дата обращения: 12.08.2012.)
46. Suri J. American grand strategy from the Cold war’s end to 9/11 // Orbis. – Philadelphia, PA, 2009. – Vol. 53. – P. 611–627.
47. Walt S. Taming American power: The global response to U.S. Primacy. – N.Y.: W.W. Norton, 2005. – 320 p.
48. Yasushi W., McConnell D. Soft power superpowers: Cultural and national assets of Japan and the United States. – Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 2008. – 328 p.
Рецензия
Просмотров:
211
Послать статью по эл. почте 
Оставить комментарий 